Exegesis of the Qur`an through the Qur`an
With
complete clarity, the Qur`an introduces itself as the explainer of all things,
when it states:
{
وَ
نَزَّلْــنَا
عَلَيْكَ
الْكِتَابَ
تِـبْـيَاناً
لِّكُلِِّ
شَيْءٍ }
“And We
have sent down The Book (Qur`an) upon you (Muhammad) as a clarifier of all
things.”[4]
If the Qur`an is an explainer of
all things, then naturally it stands to reason that it would be an explainer of
itself as well. Therefore, if there is some ambiguity in one verse of the
Qur`an - and its ambiguity was for a purpose – we can resolve its ambiguity by
referring to other verses which were revealed in regards to that same issue.
At this point, we present an
example of this concept.
In Suratul Shu’ara (26), verse
173, Allah (awj) states the following in regards to the nation of (prophet) Lut
(‘a):
{
وَ
أَمْطَرْنَا
عَلَيْهِمْ
مَّطَراً
فَسَآءَ
مَطَرُ
الْمُـنْذَرِينَ }
“And We rained down upon them a rain, and evil was
the rain on those warned.”
This
verse gives us a glimpse of the sending down of something, however it is not
clear what sort of precipitation this was – was it a spatter of water or was it
a raining down of stones? Therefore to clear this issue up, another verse of
the Qur`an, which removes the ambiguity of the verse quoted above, is referred
to in which we are told:
{
...وَ
أَمْطَرْنَا
عَلَيْهِمْ
حِجَارَةً
مِّنْ
سِجِّيلٍ... }
“…and We rained down upon them stones made from
baked clay…”[5]
The
word “حِجَارَةٌ”(stones) is the word, which
clears up the ambiguity in the first verse.
In order for us to truly
comprehend this third point, we present another example.
In one instance in the Qur`an, we
read the following:
{
هَلْ
يَنْظُرُونَ
إِلاَّ أَنْ
يَّأْتِـيَهُمُ
اللٌّهُ فِي
ظُلَلٍ مِّنَ
الْغَمَامِ وَالْمَلاَئِكَةُ
وَقُضِيَ
الأَمْرُ وَإِلـى
اللٌّهِ
تُرْجَعُ
الأُمُورُ }
“ Will they wait until Allah comes to them in canopies of clouds, with
Angels (in His train) and the question is (thus) settled? But to Allah do all
affairs go back (for decision).”[6]
The
apparent reading of this verse shows us that it is not free of ambiguity, since
the coming and going of an object are characteristics for a physical entity and
we know that the sacred essence of Allah (awj) is free from being a physical
body. Thus, we must seek to remove the vagueness, which is contained in this
verse through some other means.
One
such way is to carefully review other similar verses of the Qur`an which repeat
the same or close to the same wordings as this verse.
Such
a similar verse is in Suratul Nahl (16), verse 33, which contains approximately
the same wording. This other verse clearly shows us that the meaning of the
‘coming of the Lord’ as actually referring to the coming of ‘the commandments’
of Allah (awj) for the punishment and retribution and (also) the orders and
prohibitions from Him:
{
هَلْ
يَنْــظُرُونَ
إِلاَّ أَنْ
تَأْتِيَهُمُ
الْمَلاَئِكَةُ
أَوْ
يَأْتِيَ
أَمْرُ
رَبِّكَ
كَذٌلِكَ
فَعَلَ
الَّذِينَ
مِنْ قَبْلِهِمْ
وَمَا
ظَلَمَهُمُ
اللٌّهُ وَلٌكِنْ
كَانُوا
أَنْفُسَهُمْ
يَظْلِمُونَ }
“Do they wait until the Angels come to them, or
there comes the Command of your Lord (for their doom)? So did those who went
before them (also wait). But Allah wronged them not, no, they wronged their own
souls!”
With
complete explicitness, this verse removes any ambiguity present in the first
verse, and by adding the word “أمر
”
(the Command of Allah (awj)) the true subject of the verb
‘come’, is made clear.
This form of explanation (tafsir
of one Qur`anic verse by another verse) is a certain and unfailing method, and
is the tradition of the Imams of the Shifa and is something which even until
now is employed by the erudite commentator of the Qur`an.
The commentary of the Qur`an by
the great teacher, Aqa [Sayyid Muhammad Husayn] Tabataba’i entitled, al-Mizan
fi Tafsir al-Qur`an, has been written following this particular method of
commentary.
Of course this issue is something
different than the issue of ‘looking at the harmony which exists between the
verses of the Qur`an’, which we shall cover in detail later on in this
discussion.
At this stage, the goal is merely
to present the synoptic view of a verse through employing another verse.
However at the next level, our goal is something different and thus at that
stage, in order to reach to our own deduction of understanding a verse, we must
not keep other verses of the Qur`an out of our attention [and only look at one
verse without paying attention to other verses on the same topic].
It is incorrect to assume that if
a verse’s apparent meaning is devoid of any ambiguity, one can interpret it
without taking into regard those verses of the same issue and then attribute
that meaning to Allah (awj)!
With that said, the difference
between these two forms of commentary of the Qur`an should be clear to the
reader.
Examining the Occasion of Revelation of the Verses
The
Noble Qur`an was revealed over the span of twenty-three years, following a
chain of questions and answers [from the people] or with various events and
incidents taking place.
Having
knowledge of the history of revelation of the verses offers us a clearer
understanding of the meaning of each verse. However, this does not mean that
without knowing the history of revelation we are unable to go forth and explain
the Qur`an. Rather, since the verses of the Qur`an are a source of guidance,
clear proofs, and the distinguisher between right and wrong, just as we are
told that:
{
...هُدىً
لِّلنَّاسِ
وَبَـيِّـنَاتٍ
مِّنَ الْهُدى
وَالْفُرْقَانِ...
}
“…(this Qur`an is a) guide to mankind, and also
clear (Signs) for guidance and judgement (between right and wrong)… ”[7]
and:
{
...وَأَنْـزَلْنَا
إِلَيْكُمْ
نُوراً مُّبِيناً...
}
“…and We have sent down to you the manifest light
(the Noble Qur`an)…”[8]
thus
naturally, this is exactly what has been meant and even without referring to
the history of revelation of the verses, we are able to clearly understand
their meaning.
However,
with shifting our attention to the history of revelation of the verses, their
meaning will become clearer and even more manifest.
At
this point, we present an example that proves what we have just stated.
It
is mentioned in Suratul Tawbah (9) that:
{
وَعَلى
الثَّلاَثَةِ
الَّذِينَ
خُلِّفُوا
حَـتَّى
إِذَا
ضَاقَتْ
عَلَيْهِمُ
الأَرْضُ
بِمَا
رَحُبَتْ
وَضَاقَتْ
عَلَيْهِمْ أَنْفُسُهُمْ
وَظَنُّوا
أَنْ لاَّ
مَلْجَأَ
مِنَ اللٌّهِ
إِلاَّ
إِلَيْهِ
ثُمَّ تَابَ
عَلَيْهِمْ
لِيَتُوبُوا
إِنَّ
اللٌّهَ هُوَ
التَّوَّابُ الرَّحِيمُ }
“(He - Allah - turned in mercy also) to the three
who were left behind; (they felt guilty) to such a degree that the Earth seemed
constrained to them for all its spaciousness, and their souls seemed straitened
to them, and they perceived that there is no fleeing from Allah (and no
refuge), but to Him. Then He turned to them that they might repent, for Allah
is Oft-Returning, the Most Merciful.”[9]
There
is no doubt that the meaning of the verse is clear, however a person would
definitely have, in regards to the (deeper) meaning of this verse, the desire
to know the following things:
1. Who are the three people referred to in this verse?
2. Why were they left behind?
3. How did the Earth become constrained for them?
4. How did their chests become straitened in regards to the life of this
world and how did their souls face pressure?
5. How did they realize that other than Allah (awj), there is no other
source of refuge?
6. What is the meaning of the ability or opportunity given by Allah (awj) to
humans (Tawfiq) in relation to these people?
The
answers to each of these questions can easily be achieved by referring to the
history of revelation of this verse.
At
this stage, it would not be out of place to remind ourselves of the following
point which is that any narration which details the history of revelation of a
particular verse of the Qur`an can not automatically be accepted. Rather, in
regards to the trustworthiness of a tradition which contains the history of
revelation (of a verse), there must be some measurements in place through
which, the correct and incorrect narrations can be weighed. This is especially
true when it comes to the history of revelation of the verses of the Qur`an
which relate the stories of the previous prophets and the past generations of
people as in this area of review, precaution must not be neglected as many of
the narrations which discuss the history of revelation (of these types of
instances) have been related from unknown and unfamiliar sources and as we
know, we can never (blindly) accept historical narrations from such sources.
Unfortunately,
many of the commentaries of the Qur`an do not take this point into
consideration and therefore, some commentators have gone forth to relate any
narration which accounts the history of revelation – even from people who are
not trustworthy or reliable!