Chapter 6: The First Discussion
The Genesis of Two Main Currents During the Prophet's Lifetime
The two chief tendencies closely associated, from the start,
with the emergence of the Islamic Ummah during the Prophet's lifetime
are:
One, the current representing a belief in the devotional
acts of religion, its arbitral power and the unconditional acceptance of
religious stipulations for every aspect of life. [130]
The second is a current which sees religious faith as
eliciting devotional deed only within the special scope of overt and covert
acts of worship. It believes in the possibility of independent legal Judgment
(ijtihad) and free discretion for the amendment and improvement of religious
stipulations according to benefits (masalih) which might accrue in other
domains of life. [131]
The Companions, being foremost in faith and enlightenment,
were the best fit to create an apostolic community (Ummah risaliyyyah);
so much so that in all of human history no doctrinally-cohesive
generation has been nobler, more magnificent or unsullied than the one brought
up by the Prophet. Despite this, one must accept the existence of a wider
tendency - beginning while the Prophet was still alive - proffering
independent legal judgment as a way of determining "benefit" and
inferring it from the circumstances. It emphasized, on the other hand,
devotional acts in strict accordance with the letter, religiously stipulated.
The Prophet on many occasions suffered indignation on
account of this tendency, even in his last hours, as he lay on his deathbed (as
we shall see). [132] But there is the other tendency, which consists in a
belief in and acceptance of the arbitral power of religion, such that
devotional acts accord with both the religious stipulations and every aspect of
life.
One of the reasons behind the spread among Muslims of the
tendency toward independent legal judgment is that it seemed to cohere with
man's natural inclination to exercise his discretion, especially in view of a
perceived or valued benefit rather than of some resolution whose significance
he can hardly fathom.
This current counted several bold representatives from among
the more well-placed Companions. One case in point is `Umar b. al-Khattab,
who used to argue with the Prophet and to exercise independent legal judgment
on a number of issues in a way that was at variance with the provisions of the
law. He believed this to be permissible so long as he thought his judgment did
not impugn "benefit." In this respect, one may note his position
regarding the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and his protestations against it. [133] It
is observable in regard to several other issues, including the call to ritual
prayer (al-adhan), where he exercised his free discretion
by omitting the phrase, "Come to the best of deeds" (hayya `ala khayr amal) [134]; his position concerning the Prophet's legalization of mut'at al-hajj ("marriage during the pilgrimage") [135] ;
and other positions on independent legal Judgment. [136]
These two currents were both reflected in the assembly
called by the Prophet on the last day of his life. Al-Bukhari related in
his Sahih the words of Ibn `Abbas:
When death was upon God's Messenger, and at [his] house were
men who included `Umar b. al-Khattab, the Prophet said, "Come! let
me write you an epistle by which you will never go astray..." `Umar then
said, "The Prophet is overcome with pain, but we [still] have the Qur'an.
We count on God's Book." Those present at the house disagreed and
quarreled with each other. And one of them said, "Approach that the
Prophet may write you a letter by which you shall never go astray."
Another repeated what `Umar had said. When the inanities and the disputing
persisted, the Prophet told them, "Leave!' [137]
This event alone suffices to show the chasm that separated
the two currents, the true extent of their incompatibility and rivalry. In
order to depict the deeprootedness of independent legal judgment as a current,
one may compare this event to the disagreement that erupted among the
Companions over Usamah b. Zayd's installation as army commander, despite the
Prophet's explicit ordinance to that effect. Ill, the Prophet finally stepped
outside to address the crowd: "O People! what is this talk surrounding my
appointment of Usamah as commander. You contest his appointment now just as you
previously did his father's. But by God, the latter was as fit to command then
as his son surely is now!" [138]
The two currents, whose rivalry began in earnest during the
Prophet's own lifetime, were reflected in the Muslims' position regarding the
thesis of the Imam's preeminence in the Mission after the Prophet. Those representing
the devotional tendency (as opposed to the one for independent legal judgment)
found in the Prophet's stipulation the reason for accepting this thesis without
hesitation or readjustment.
The advocacy of independent legal judgment was viewed as
offering the possibility of release from the pattern established by the
Prophet, whenever a judgment imagined to be more harmonious with the
circumstances was called for. By the same token, one observes that Shi`ites
arose immediately after the Prophet's death, representing the Muslims who
adhered in practice to the thesis of the Imam's preeminence and leadership, the
first steps of whose implementation the Prophet had declared obligatory right
after his departure. The Shi'ite current embodied, from the first, a
repudiation of the Saqifah Council's attempt to paralyze the thesis for Imam
`Ali's preeminence and to transfer authority to someone else.
In his Ihtijaj, Tabarsi
related Aban b. Taghlab's words:
I told Ja`far b. Muhammad al-Sadiq, "May I be offered
in sacrifice for you! Is there anyone among the Companions of God's Messenger
who disclaims Abu Bakr's action?" He replied "Indeed. Twelve men
repudiated it. Among the Muhajirin were Khalid b. Said, Ibn Abi al`Asi,
Salman al-Farisi, Abu Dharr al-Ghifari al-Miqdad b. al-Aswad,
`Ammar b. Yasir and Buraydah al-Aslami. Among the Ansar were Abu
al-Haytham b. al-Tayhan, `Uthman b. Hanif, Khuzayma b. Thabit Dhu
al-Shahadatayn, Ubayy b. Ka'b, Abu Ayyub al-Ansari. [139]
It may be argued that the Shi`ite current stood for
religious devotion according to the text, while the tendency that opposed it
represented independent legal judgment, with the implication that the Shi'ites
had rejected independent legal judgment and did not allow themselves any right
to exercise it. Yet observably, Shi'ites do make use of it constantly in legal
practice.
The answer is that the kind of independent legal judgment
practised by Shi`ites, and which they deem permissible - indeed,
obligatory in a collective sense (wajiban
kifa'iyyan) - is the one
used to derive a juridical ruling from the legal text. It is not judgment
applied to the legal text by virtue of either an opinion held by the
practitioner or some conjectured benefit." That is not permissible. The
Shi'ite current disallowed the exercise of independent legal judgment in any
such sense. Whenever we speak of the rise of two currents at the beginning of
Islam, one often intends the following. One, where the devotion act is based on
the explicit text; two, a tendency toward independent legal judgment But by
independent legal judgment one could mean either the rejection or the
acceptance of the explicit text.
The rise of these two tendencies is natural to every mission
of comprehensive change seeking alteration at the root, where corruption
prevails. It can have various kinds of effects, depending on the surviving
vestiges of the past; and it may vary according to the extent to which the
individual becomes immersed in the moral values of the new Message and
according to his attachment to it.
Hence, we know that the current which stood for the
devotional act based on the explicit text represented the greatest degree of
adherence to, and the most complete acceptance of, the Divine Message. But it
did not reject independent legal judgment within the framework of the text nor
the effort to derive a legal ruling (hukm) there from. [141]
What is important to note in this regard also is that the
devotional act based on the explicit text does not imply a rigidity or
inflexibility incompatible with the exigencies of evolution or any kind of
initiative for renewal in the life of man. Devotion so based means, rather, as
we now know, devotion through religion. It means embracing it in its entirety
without leaving anything out. Such a religion carries within it all the
elements that make for resilience and the ability to adjust to the times. It
embraces all kinds of change and evolution. Devotion through religion based on
the stipulated text is devotion through all these elements, but with every
fiber of one's ability to create, invent and renew. [142]
These are general features aimed at expounding Shi'ism in
its definition as a "natural phenomenon" within the fold of the
Islamic Call and of its appearance as a (self-conscious) response to this
natural phenomenon.
Chapter 7: The Second Discussion
The leadership belonging to the Prophetic Household and to
Imam Ali, played out in the "natural phenomenon" so far alluded to
consists of two types of authority.
The first is intellectual authority; the second, authority
associated with governing and societal activity. Both were embodied in the
person of the Prophet. In the light of what we have learned with respect to
circumstances, the Prophet had had to determine the most fitting extension of
his rule which could sustain each of these two authorities, in order that
intellectual authority might fill any lacunae to be faced by the Muslim mind. A
proper notion needs to be advanced - i.e. the Islamic viewpoint -
on any intellectual or life issues evoked. It must explicate what appears
ambiguous and obscure in the Holy Book. [143]
The Qur'an constitutes the primary source for intellectual
authority in Islam. Finally, the purpose is for socio-political authority
to resume its course and to lead the trek of Islam along a societal path.
These two types of authority are combined within the
Household of the Prophet by force of those circumstances we considered earlier.
Prophetic traditions have always confirmed this. The prime example of a
tradition dealing with intellectual authority is the hadith of the "Two Weights" (hadith al-thaqlayn), where
the Prophet proclaims:
I am about to be summoned [before my Lord], and must comply.
I leave with ye two weighty things: God's Book, a rope from Heaven to Earth;
and my progeny, the members of my Household. God the Gracious, the All-Knowing
has informed me that they shall separate not to the day when they will be
restored to me at the Basin. You behold how, you do by them after I am gone!
[144]
The chief example of a Prophetic stipulation concerning
authority in the exercise of leadership over society is hadith al-Ghadir. It is presented by Tabarani, on the grounds of
its universally-accepted soundness, through Zayd b. Arqam's words:
The Messenger of God gave his sermon at Ghadir Khum beneath
some trees, declaring. "O People, I am about to be summoned [before my
Lord], and must comply. I shall be held to account and ye shall be held to
account. But what will you say?" They replied, "We shall testify that
you have delivered [the Message], striven and counseled. May God reward you for
it!" He then told them, "Would you not testify that there is no god
but God [Allah], and that Muhammad is his Servant and Messenger that His
Paradise is real and His Hell-Fire real; that death is real; that the
resurrection after death is real; that the Hour shall without a doubt come;
that God resurrects all those who lie in their graves?" They said:
"Nay, we shall testify to all this!" To which he replied, "O God
be Thee Witness! O People God is my Guardian and I guardian of the faithful. I
am more so than their own selves. For whomsoever I am a guardian, he too [i.e.
`Ali] is his guardian. Lord, guard over the one who guards over him, and be a
foe to his foe." [145]
Thus, of a considerable number of like traditions, these two
outstanding Prophetic hadiths provide
for the embodiment of both kinds of authority in the Prophet's Household. The
Islamic current upholding the devotional act based on the Prophet's full
stipulations believed in these authorities, and comprised those Muslims who
were the benevolent friends of the Household.
But whereas the socio-political authority belonging to
every Imam implies the exercise of power while he lives, intellectual authority
is a permanent, unconditional reality unconfined to the period of his lifetime.
Therefore, it has a living, practical meaning for every period. So long as the
Muslims needed a definitive understanding of Islam, an acquaintance with its
provisions, legality, prohibitions, concepts and moral values, there will be
need for an intellectual Divinely-defined authority epitomized, firstly,
by the Book of God; secondly, by the Prophet's Tradition (sunnat rasulihi)
and that of the immaculate descendents, if the Household, who never have and
never would diverge from the Books as indeed the Prophet himself has
stipulated. [146]
Fronts they very outset, the second tendency, which upholds
independent legal judgment rather than the devotional act according to the
text, had decided. with the death of the Prophet on transferring the authority
for exercising political power to some leading personalities of the Muhajirin, thereby conforming with
shifting and rather maleable considerations. Immediately following the
Prophet's death, the transfer of power to Abu Bakr was based on what came out
of the limited discussions at the Saqifah session. [147] `Umar later ascended
to the Caliphate after being appointed by Abu Bakr [148]; `Uthman followed suit
through an undesignated appointment by `Umar. [149] Accommodation, a third of a
century after the Prophet's passing, led to the infiltration to positions of
power by the offspring of all those Meccans who had held out to the last (al-Tulaqa)
[150] and who just yesterday had been fighting Islam.
All that relates to political authority in its exercise of
power. Intellectual authority, on the other hand, was difficult to institute in
the members of the Household. Independent legal judgment therewith led to
dispossession of their political authority, since the latter's institution
entailed the creation of objective conditions for a transfer of power to them
and a merging of the two kinds of authority.
However, it was equally difficult to acknowledge
intellectual authority in a power-wielding Caliph, the requirements of
intellectual authority being different from those of the exercise of power. The
feeling that a person is qualified to exercise power did not automatically imply
that his installation as intellectual leader - the highest authority
after the Qur'an and Prophetic Tradition in matters of theoretical
understanding - was thought feasible. This kind of leadership required a
high degree of refinement and theoretical comprehension, and clearly none of
the Companions was more adequately endowed with it than the rest, if the
members of the Household are excluded.
[151]
The result was that the balance of intellectual authority
continued to swing for some time. The Caliphs, in many instances, dealt with
Imam `Ali on the basis of his intellectual authority, or something approaching
that. So much so that the Second Caliph repeated many times that "If not
for 'Ali, `Umar would surely have perished. God forbid that there be a problem
and no Abu Hasan to [solve] it..." [152] Nevertheless, after the Prophet's
passing, the Muslims in time became accustomed to see Imam `Ali and the
Household as ordinary subjects, whose intellectual authority was not
indispensable, but transferable to some reasonable substitute. That substitute
was rot to be the Caliph himself, but the Prophet's Companions.
The principle of the Companions' collective authority was
gradually postulated thus, in place of the authority of the Household. The
substitute became palatable once the properly appointed authority was passed
over, because the Companions' generation was said to have kept close company
with the Prophet, thrived while he lived, embraced his experience, heeded his
words and practice. [153] For all practical purposes, the members of the
Household lost their God-given distinction to form part of the
intellectual authority merely as Companions. But the Companions themselves were
apt to experience sharp differences and conflicts, which sometimes reached the
point of hostilities, with each party drawing the other's blood, impugning his
honour, hurling accusations of deviation and betrayal. [154] These differences
and accusations, occurring as they did inside the intellectual leadership and
doctrinal authority itself, engendered all manner of intellectual and doctrinal
conflict [155] within the body of the Islamic community. The latter reflected
the conflictual dimensions of the intellectual leadership established by
independent judgment.