[1] Let us first
consider the ideas of several Western scholars on the history of science in
Islamic societies:
John Bernal has written:
"Islam has been the
religion of science and knowledge from the very beginning. Furthermore, unlike
the Roman Empire, Islamic cities did not isolate themselves from the rest of
the East. Islam was where Asian and European sciences met. Thus, inventions
were made that were totally unknown -or even unachievable- to Greek or Roman
technology, such as steel products, silk paper and enamelled chinaware. Such
inventions also led to other advances, bringing about more activity in the West
and eventually the 17th and 18th industrial revolutions.”
[2]
Isaac Asimov explains:
"In the seventh
century, the Arabs conquered Damascus, and then Egypt, thus inheriting a vast
treasure of Greek knowledge and science.
This historical paint is
highly significant, for if Muslims hadn't become so powerful and sophisticated,
the whole civilized world might have become a battle field for barbarian
tribes.
During the thousand
years of the Byzantine Empire, science and technology were completely forsaken
among the intense struggles and battles for power. Calinicus was the only
glitter of science and wisdom in that era. Western Europe was in a deep sleep
of ignorance and darkness. The Muslims were the only guardians of science. They
not only saved Greek science and philosophy by translating them, but also
enriched science with their amazing works of research and excellent books.
Alchemy was of particular interest to them. [3]
Sigrid Hunke agrees:
"We have inherited
science and technology not only from Rome and Greece, but also from the world
of Islamic thought.
The West undoubtedly owes Islam a great deal.”
Philip Hitti adds:
"No civilization
achieved as much scientific progress during the medieval era as the Muslims did.”
John Bernal writes:
“The Muslims were
culturally independent, and received a warm welcome having conquered the
Mediterranean areas… In fact, it would have been more logical to consider the
history of science confined to the period between the seventh (1st century Hijra)
and fourteenth centuries ...The basic topics (of Islamic culture) are
interestingly not only worldly, but also scientific. This is why Christian
universities followed Islamic methods ...It was the Muslims who taught the
Europeans how to make and use paper in the 12th century. [4]
We must remember that
since the final end of Islam is achieving a reasonable life, posing the
question whether Islam considers science necessary or not, is like asking
whether Islam considers reasonable life a necessity or not, for science
-discovering reality -is a part of the context of reasonable life. If we study
almost 700 Koranic verses and hundreds of hadith cited in reliable
Islamic reference books, we will find that Islam believes that living without a
knowledge of the realities of man and the universe is not living at all, and
realize how ridiculous it is to question the value of science in Islam. In order
to study the influence of these references on Muslims, it is best to refer to
the great number of Muslim scientists and scholars throughout history.
Bertrand Russell admits:
"The Muslims had a
more experimental approach in their scientific research -particularly in
chemistry -than the Greek, They endeavoured to turn cheap metals into gold,
discover the secrets of alchemy and reach the elixir of life, because they had
a deep respect for chemistry.
During all the years of
ignorant and darkness, it was the Muslims who actually advanced civilization,
and any knowledge gained by late medieval scholars, like Roger Bacon, was based
on Islamic science.”[5]
Aldo Mili writes:
"Arabic knowledge,
which provided the basis for the new European civilization, lost its worldwide
acclaim in the l3th century.
Alfred North Whitehead adds:
"The Byzantine and
the Muslims were civilizations themselves, so their cultures retained their
innate forces, reinforced by physical and spiritual adventures. They traded
with the Far East and widened their territory in the West, made laws, created
new forms of art, took an analytical approach to theology, revolutionized
mathematics and enriched medicine. [6]
George Sarton believes:
"Perhaps the most
significant -but still the least visible -scientific development during the
medieval era, was the establishment of empirical thought. The Muslims made
possible the progress of this way of thinking up to the 12th century...Even a
brief description of how Islam has developed science would exceed the capacity
of this book. They did far more than just translating Greek scientific
references. They not only passed science on to the next generations, but also
provided their own innovations.
Creating a new universal
excellent scientific civilization in less than two centuries is quite an
achievement, and we cannot praise it enough.” [7]
In Allah's Sun
Shines on the West, Sigrid Hunke adds:
"Using their
scientific research and experience, the Muslims changed the raw material they
got from the Greek into a new face of science. In fact, it was the Muslims who
established the role of experience in scientific endeavour... Not only did the
Arabs save the Greek civilization from fading away, but also introduced
empirical scientific methods in chemistry, natural sciences, arithmetic,
algebra, zoology, trigonometry and social sciences. Furthermore, many of their
inventions and discoveries in various fields of science were stolen or
pertained to others.”
Gustav Le Bon, the
French researcher believes:
"Up to the 15th
century, no quotation was credited unless it had been quoted by the (Muslim)
Arabs. George Bacon, Leonardo do Vinci, Arnold, Raymond Loli, Villano, St.
Thomas, Great Albert and Alfons the Tenth were either trained in Islamic
schools or wrote about them. Renagne, the French philosopher believes that the
Great Albert learned all he knew from Avicenna, and St. Thomas' philosophy
originates from Ibn Rushd. For
500 to 600 years books written
by Muslims dominated European textbooks.”[8]
Let us return to John Bernal,
who has divided great scientific endeavours into three periods:
“There have been three
great periods of scientific endeavours: 9th - century Islam, 11th-century Spain
and 13th-century France.”
Thus, can we still claim
that Muslims imitated others' science?
Their empirical method
was not incidental; it is derived from Islamic reference books. Imam Ali (a)
has frequently emphasized the necessity of science. Here are a few of his hadith
on this matter:
1- Experience leads
to new science. [9]
2- There are two
types of wisdom: natural and experience-based. Both are quite advantageous.
[10]
3- The value of man’s
ideas depends on his experience. [11]
4- Accurate
calculation leads to success and it is experience can cause accurate
calculation
5- Wisdom lies in
keeping and using one's experience [12]
6- Cruel is the one
who deprives himself of the treasure of wisdom and experience he has [13]
Examples of the Amazing
Flourish of Science and Objective Culture in Islam
Pierre Rosseau writes:
"Only three centuries
after the demise of the Prophet of Islam, Qartaba with the population of one
million, had
80 public schools - almost equivalent to today's
universities -and a library containing 600, 000 books in Arabic, which
had become the main language of science around the world. [14]
Let us now take a look
at some of the libraries built by Muslims:
1. The library of the
observatory at Maragheh, built by Khwajah Nasiruddin Tousi, containing 400,000
books.
2. The library of Najaf
in the 10th century (about the time Sheikh Tousi lived) contained 40, 000 books
3. During the reign
of the Baghdad Caliphs, one library had 100,000 books.
4. Azizi, the Caliph
of Cairo, had a library containing 1,600,000 books, 6500 volumes
of which were on mathematics and 18000 others on philosophy. His son, as
his successor, did a great deal to develop the library, and built 18 study
halls near it.
In addition, governors
and visitors throughout history have played a significant role in gathering
books and constructing libraries that paved the path toward scientific advance.
Mahlabi left after his death a library of
170, 000 books. His
young colleague, Saheb-ibn-Ibad, had collected 206,000 books, and one of
Saheb’s judges had collected over a hundred thousand books. These figures are,
nevertheless, approximate. Many librarians were busy working in Cairo, where
only two of the libraries had 2,200,000 books. In 891, there were
a hundred libraries in Baghdad” [15]
Footnotes:
[1] This appendix has
been compiled from Allameh Jafari's Interpretation of the Nahjol-balagheh,
Vols. 19 and 22.
[2] John Bernal, Science
in History.
[3] Isaac Asimov, The
Encyclopaedia of Science and Industry.
[4] John Bernal, Science
in History.
[5] John Bernal, Science
in History.
[6] Alfred North Whitehead,
The Story of Thoughts.
[7] George Sarton, The
Story of Science.
[8] Gustave Le Bon, The
Islamic and Arab Civilization.
[9] Hassan ibn Ali ibn
Shu'ba, Tohaf-ol-oghoul.
[10] Allameh Majlesi,
Beharul-Anwar.
[11] Abdul-vahed Amedi, Ghorar-ol-hekam
va Dorar-ol-kalem.
[12] Nahj-ol-balagheh,
Letter No.31 (Imam Ali's letter to Imam Hassan)
[13] Ibid.,
Letter No.78.
[14] Pierre Rosseau, The
History of Science.
[15] Sigrid Hunke, Allah’s
sonne Uber den Abendland (Allah’s Sun Shines Upon the West.)