Lesson One: Introduction
The study of jurisprudence is one of the most extensive studies in Islam.
Its history is older than all the other Islamic studies. It has been studied
on a very wide scale throughout the whole of that time. So many jurisprudents
have appeared in Islam that their numbers cannot be counted.
The Word Jurisprudence (fiqh) in the Quran and the
Traditions
The words fiqh and tafaqquh, both meaning "profound understanding",
have been often used in the Quran and in the Traditions. In the Holy Quran
we have been told: "Why should not a company from every group of them
go forth to gain profound understanding (tafaqquh) in religion and
to warn their people when they return to them, so that they may beware.
" (9:122)
In the Traditions, the Holy Prophet has told us: "Whoever from my nation
learns forty Traditions; God will raise him as a faqih (jurisprudent)
an alim (a man of 'ilm or knowledge)."
We do not know for sure if the 'ulema and fuzala, the learned and distinguished,
of the Prophet's companions were called fuqaha (jurisprudents),
but it is certain that this name was applied to a group since the time
of those who had not witnessed the Prophet but had witnessed those who
had (tabi'in).
Seven of the tabi'in were called 'the seven jurisprudents'. The year
94 A.H. which was the year of the departure from this world of Imam Ali
ibn Husein (d,) and the year in which Sa'id ibn Masib and Orwat ibn Zubayr
of the "seven jurisprudents" and Sa'id ibn Jabir and others of the jurisprudents
of Medina also passed away, was called the 'year of the jurisprudents'.
Thereafter the word fuqaha was gradually given to those with knowledge
of Islam, especially of the laws of Islam.
The holy Imams have repeatedly made use of these words. They have commanded
some of their companions to profound understanding (taffaqquh) or
have termed them as a master of jurisprudence or fuqaha (the plural of
faqih, a jurisprudent). The prominent pupils of the Imams during
that same period were known as Shi'ite fuqaha.
The word jurisprudence (fiqh) in the terminology of
the 'ulema
In the terminology of the Quran and the Sunnah, fiqh is the extensive,
profound knowledge of Islamic instructions and realities and has no special
relevance to any particular division. In the terminology of the 'ulema,
however, it gradually came to be especially applied to the profound understanding
of the Islamic laws. The 'ulema of Islam have divided the Islamic teachings
into three parts:
First, the realities and beliefs: the aim of which is
awareness, faith and certitude, and which are related to the heart and
the mind, containing issues like the issues related to the unseen past
and the unseen future, to Prophethood, revelation, angels and Imamate.
Second, morality and self-perfection: the goals of which
are the spiritual qualities of how to be and how not to be, containing
issues like cautiousness of God (taqwa), justice ('idalat),
generosity, courage, fortitude and patience (sabr) being satisfied
and content with God (riza) firmness on the true path (istiqamat)
and so on.
Third, the laws and issues of actions: which is related
to the special external actions that human beings must perform and how
the actions they perform are to be and how they are not to be.
The jurisprudents of Islam have termed this last division, fiqh
(jurisprudence), perhaps from the viewpoint that since the early days of
Islam the laws were the most subject to attention and queries. Therefore,
those whose speciality was in this subject came to be known as the fuqaha
(jurisprudents).
Two Types of Law
It is necessary that we mention some of the special terms of the jurisprudents.
Amongst these is the names of the two divisions the jurisprudents have
made of the Divine Laws: the laws of (human ) duty (hukm taklifi)
and the laws of (human) situations (hukm waz'i).
The laws of duty include those duties which contain obligation, prohibition,
desirability, undesirability, and, simple permissibility.
These five laws are termed as "the five laws" (ahkam khamsah).
The jurisprudents say that in the view of Islam no single action is
empty of one of these five laws. Either it is obligatory (wajib),
meaning that it must be done and must not be left undone, like the five
daily ritual prayers, or it is forbidden (haram), meaning that it
must not be performed and must be refrained from like lies, injustice,
drinking alcohol and such like; or it is desirable (mustahab) meaning
that it is good to do but leaving it undone is not a crime or sin, including
such things as praying in a mosque; or it is undesirable (makruh),
meaning that it is bad to do but if done no sin is committed, like talking
about worldly affairs in a mosque which is a place of worship; or it is
permissable (mubah), meaning that the doing of it and the not doing
of it are exactly equal, and this includes most actions.
The laws regarding situation are not like the laws regarding duty. The
laws regarding duty consist of "do's" and "don'ts", commands and prohibitions,
or the giving of permissions, while the laws of situation regard situations
like marriage and ownership and the rights thereof.
Types of Obligation
Another issue is that the obligations, the things that are obligatory,
are divided into many different classifications. Firstly, they are divided
into ta'abbudi and tawassuli.
Ta'abbodi means those things, the correct and valid performance
of which depends upon the intention (niyyat) of nearness of God.
That is, if the obligatory action is performed solely with the intention
of approaching the Divine without any worldly, material motive, it is correct
and valid, and if not, it is not valid. Prayer and fasting are both "wajib
ta'abbudi"
Wajib tawassuli, however, is that in which, even if performed,
imagine, without the intention of nearness to God, still the obligation
has been met and one's duty fulfilled. Obeying one's parents, for example.
Or the performance of responsibilities towards society, like if a person
undertakes to do a certain work in return for a certain payment, the doing
of that work. And, in fact, absolute loyalty to all one's promises is the
same way.
Another way in which the obligations are divided is into 'aini
and kafa'i. An 'aini obligation means that which is obligatory
on each and every individual, like prayer and fasting, and kafa'i
obligation is that which is obligatory on the general Muslim population,
and which, when performed by one or a group of them, is no longer obligatory
on any of them. Such types of obligation include the needs of the community
like the need for doctors, soldiers, judges, farmers, traders and so on.
In the same class is the burial procedures of deceased Muslims that the
general Muslim population is commanded to perform, which, when performed
by some, are no longer obligatory on any.
Another way the obligations are divided is into t'ayini and takhiyiri.
A t'ayini obligation is that a special specified thing must be performed,
like the daily prayers, fasting, Hajj, khoms, zakat,
commanding to what is recognised as good (amr bi m 'aruf), struggle
(jihad), etc.
A takhiyiri obligation on the other hand, means that the duty-bound
is to perform one thing out of two or several things. For example, if a
person has intentionally not fasted one day during the holy month of Ramazan,
it is a takhiyiri obligation for him either to free a slave, or
to feed sixty poor people or to fast consecutively for two months.
Yet another way the obligations are divided is into nafsi and
muqaddami. A nafsi obligation means that the duty itself
is the concern of the Shari'ah, and it is for its own sake that it is demanded,
while a muqaddami obligation is obligatory for the sake of something
else.
For example, to save a respected person's life is obligatory but this
obligation is not a preparation for some other obligation. However, the
actions needed in preparation for saving him, such as acquiring a rope
or boat or other means of saving a person who, let us say, has fallen in
a river and cannot swim, are also obligatory, not for their own sakes but
as a preparation for a different obligation, the obligation of saving the
man's life.
Or, for example, the actions of the Hajj are themseives obligatory,
but the acquiring of a passport and ticket and the other preparations are
obligatory in preparation. Prayer is a nafsi obligation, while to
take Wuzu or ghusl or tayammum as their substitute
in order to enter the state of cleanliness necessary for the prayer are
not obligatory until the time of prayer has begun, and then not for themselves,
but as an obligatory preparation for the obligatory prayer. Thus the Hajj
and the ritual prayers are both nafsi obligations, while acquiring
a passport or taking ablution are muqaddami obligations.
Lesson Two: Brief History of Jurisprudence and Jurisprudents
As we mentioned in the previous lessons, one of the preparations for
learning about any field of knowledge is to pay attention to the famous
personalities of that field, the views and ideas of whom were important,
and to its important books.
Jurisprudence, the jurisprudence in which books have been classified
and compiled that are still studied today, has a history of eleven hundred
years, meaning that for eleven centuries, without a break, centres for
the studying of jurisprudence and the related studies have existed. Masters
have trained students and those students in their turn have trained other
students, and this has continued down the ages until today. Furthermore,
this relationship between master and pupil has never been broken.
Other fields, of course, like philosophy, logic, arithmetic and medicine
have been studied for far longer, and books exist on. these subjects that
are older than the books that exist on jurisprudence. Perhaps in none of
these subjects, however, can the guarding of the same kind of ever-present
relationship between master and pupil be shown that has existed in jurisprudence.
Even if such constant relationships existed in other subjects, still they
are particular to the fields of Islamic studies. Only in the Islamic world
does the system of teaching and studying have a continuous uninterrupted
history going back over a thousand years.
The Shi'ite Jurisprudents
We will begin the history of the Shi'ite jurisprudents from the period
of the Imam's "minor occultation" (260-320 A.H.), and this we will do for
two reasons:
First, the period previous to the "minor occultation"
was the period of the presence of the holy Imams, and in the period of
their presence, although there were jurisprudents and mujtahids
who were able to make their own verdicts, who had been encouraged by the
Imams to do so, yet due to the presence of the Imams they were nevertheless
outshone by the brilliance of the Imams. That is, the referral of problems
to the verdicts of the jurisprudents is because of there being no access
to the Imams. In the period of the Imams' presence, however, people tried
as far as possible to refer to the original sources of the Imams. Similarly,
even the jurisprudents, bearing in mind distances and other difficulties,
used to place their own problems before the Imams whenever they could.
Second, in the formal, classified jurisprudence, we are
limited to the period of the minor occultation, for none of the actual
books in jurisprudence from that period has reached us, or, if any have,
I have no information about it.
All the same, amongst the Shi'ites there were great jurisprudents during
the days of the holy Imams, whose value can become apparent and determined
by comparing them with the jurisprudents of their period from other sects.
The Sunni, ibn Nadin writes in his book Fihrist about Husein ibn Sa'id
Ahwazi and his brother, both notable Shi'ite jurisprudents, "They were
the best of those of their time in knowledge of jurisprudence, effects
(i.e. writings and compilations) and talents," and, about 'Ali ibn Ibrahim
Qumi he writes, "Amongst the 'ulema and jurisprudents," and, about Muhammad
ibn Hasan ibn Ahmad ibn Walid, "And he has amongst books the book Jam'e
fil-fiqh".
Apparently these books were compiled of traditions on the varying subjects
of jurisprudence that the compilors considered to be reliable, and to which
they acted in accordance, together with the comments of the compilors.
The scholar Hilli, in the introduction to his book M'utabar wrote,
"Bearing in mind that our jurisprudents (God be pleased with them) are
many and their compilations numerous and to narrate the names of them all
is not possible, I will content myself with those who are the most famous
in merit, research and good selection, and with the books of those paragons
whose ijtihad is mentioned in other undoubtable books as reliable.
"Those I will mention include, from the 'earlier' period (i.e. the period
of access to the Imams), Hassan ibn Mahboub, Ahmad ibn Ali Nasr Bazanti,
Husayn ibn Sa'id, Fadl ibn Shathan, Yunis ibn 'Abd ur-Rahman and, from
the later period, Muhammad ibn Babawayh Qumi (Shaykh Saduq), and Muhammad
ibn Y'aqub Kulayni and from the authors of verdicts (fatwas) Ali ibn Babawayh
Qumi, ibn Jamid Iskafi, ibn Ali 'Agil, Shaykh Mufid, Syed Morteza.'Alam
ul Huda and Shaykh Tusi . . . "
Notice that although the first group are quoted as having their own
views and good selection and ijtihad, yet they are not mentioned
as being masters of verdicts.
This was because their books, even though they were the summaries of
their ijtihad, were in the form of collections of traditions and
not in the form of verdicts.
Now we will look at the history of Shi'ite jurisprudents, as I have
said, from the period of the Imam's occcultation .
Ali ibn Babawayh Qumi, died in 329 A.H. buried in Qum. The father of
Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Babawayh known as Shaykh Saduq, who is buried
near Tehran. The son was learned in Traditions, the father in jurisprudence
and compiled a book of his verdicts. Normally this father and son are called
Saduqayn.
'Ayashi Samarqandi, lived at the same time as Ali ibn Babawayh or a
little before. The author of a famous commentary of the Quran, though his
speciality was commentary, he is still numbered amongst the jurisprudents.
He wrote many books in different fields including jurisprudence. Ibn Nadim
writes that the books of this man were largely available in Khorasan, but
I have not yet seen his views related anywhere, and his books on jurisprudence
no longer exist.
'Ayashi was originally a Sunni Muslim but later became a Shi'ite. He
inherited vast wealth from his father, and this he spent on collecting
and copying books and on teaching and training his students.
Ibn Jamid-Iskafi, one of the teachers of Shaykh Mufid. It seems he passed
away in 381 A.H. and it is said that his books and writings numbered fifty.
His views have ever been subject to consideration in jurisprudence and
still are to this day.
Shaykh Mufid. His name was Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Naman. He was both
a mutakalam (theologian) and a jurisprudent. Ibn Nadim, in the section
of his book Fihrist in which he discusses Shi'ite mutakalamin, calls
him "ibn Mu'alim" and praises him. Born in 336 A.H. he passed away in 413.
His famous book in jurisprudence, Muqna'ah, is still used today.
The son-in law of Shaykh Mufid, Abu Y'ala J'afari, tells us that Shaykh
Mufid slept little at night, and spent the rest in worship, study and teaching
or reciting the Quran.
Seyyid Morteza, known as 'Alam ul Huda, born 355 A.H. and passed away
in 436 A.H. Allamah Hilli has called him the teacher of the Shi'ites of
the Imams. He was a master of ethics, theology and jurisprudence. His views
on jurisprudence are still studied by the jurisprudents of today. He and
his brother, Seyyid Razi the compiler of the Nahj ul-balagha, both
studied under Shaykh Mufid.
Lesson Three: Brief History of Jurisprudence and JurisPrudents.
(2)
Shaykh Abu J 'afar Tusi, one of the shining stars of the Islamic world,
wrote many books on jurisprudence and the principles of jurisprudence,
Traditions, commentaries, theology and the transmittors. Originally from
Khorasan (in east Iran), he was born in 385 A.H. and after twenty-two years
emigrated to Baghdad which in those days was the great centre of Islamic
studies and culture. He stayed in Iraq the rest of his life and after the
demise of his teacher, Seyyid Morteza, the directorship of learning and
the station of highest reference for verdicts (fatwas) was transferred
to him.
Shaykh Tusi remained for twelve more years in Baghdad but then, due
to a series of disturbances in which his house and library were ravaged,
he left for Najaf where he formed the famous scholastic centre which still
exists today. There, in the year 460 A.H., he passed away.
One of the books which were compiled about jurisprudence by Shaykh Tusi
was called An-Nahayeh, and was used as a textbook for religious
students. Another, Masbut, brought jurisprudence into a new stage
and was the most famous Shi'ite book of jurisprudence of its time. In Khelaf,
another of his books, he wrote about both the views of the jurisprudents
of the Sunni schools and also those of the Shi'ite jurisprudents. He also
wrote other books about jurisprudence, and, until about a century ago,
whenever the name Shaykh was mentioned the man meant was Shaykh Tusi, and
by Shaykhayn was meant Shaykh Tusi and Shaykh Mufid. According to what
has been related in some books, it seems the daughters of Shaykh Tusi were
also distinguished faqihat. [1]
Ibn Idris Hilli, one of the distinguished Shi'ite 'ulema. He himself
was an Arab though Shaykh Tusi is counted as having been his maternal grandfather.
He is known for the freedom of his thought; he broke the awe and reverence
of his grandfather Shaykh Tusi and his criticisms of the jurisprudents
bordered on impertinence. He died in 598 A.H. at the age of fifty-five.
Shaykh Abul-Qasim J 'afar ibn Hasan ibn Yahya ibn Sa'id Hilli, known
as Muhaqqeq Hilli. Author of many books about jurisprudence, amongst them:
Sharay'e, Ma'arej, Al-Mukhtasar an-naf'i and many
others. He was the student of ibn Idris Hilli, and the teacher of Allamah
Hilli who we are to speak about. In jurisprudence he has no superior. Whenever
in the terms of jurisprudence the word muhaqqiq is used it refers
to him. Great philosophers and mathematicians used to meet with him and
used to sit in his lessons of jurisprudence. The books of Muhaqqiq, especially
the book Sharay'i, has been a textbook for students and still is,
while his books have been subject to the commentaries of many other jurisprudents.
Ibn Hasan ibn Yusef ibn Ali ibn Mutahhar Hilli, famous as Allamah Hilli,
one of the prodegies of the age. Books have been written by him about jurisprudence,
principles, theology, logic, philosophy, transmittors and still other things.
Around a hundred of his books have been recognised, some of which, I like
Tathkurat ul-fuqaha are alone enough to indicate his genius. Allamah
wrote many books on jurisprudence which have mostly, like the books of
Muhaqqiq, been commented on by the jurisprudents who succeeded him. His
famous books on jurisprudence include Irshad, Tabsaratol Muta'alemin,
Qawa'id, Tahrir, Tathhorat-ul-fuqaha, Mukhtalif
ash-shia' and Mutaha. He studied under various teachers: jurisprudence
under his paternal uncle, Muhaqqiq Hilli, philosophy under Khawajeh Nasir
ud-Din Tusi, and Sunni jurisprudence under the 'ulema of the Sunnis. He
was born in the year 648 A.H. and passed away in 726 A.H.
Muhammad ibn Makki, known as Shahid Awal ("the First Martyr"), one of
the great Shi'ite jurisprudents. He is of the rank of Muhaqqiq Hilli and
Allamah Hilli. He was from Jabal 'Amel, an area in today's south Lebanon
which is one of the oldest centres of Shi'ites and still is today a Shi'ite
area. Shahid Awal was born in 734 A.H., and, in 786 A.H., according to
the fatwa of a jurisprudent from the Maliki sect which was endorsed by
a jurisprudent of the Shaf'i sect, he was martyred. He was a pupil of the
pupils of Allamah Hilli, amongst them Allamah's son, Fakhr ul-Muhaqqeqin.
The famous books of Shahid Awal on jurisprudence include Al-lum'ah
which he composed during the brief period he remained in prison awaiting
his martyrdom. Amazingly, this noble book was subject to a commentary two
centuries later by another great jurisprudent who suffered the same fate
as the author. He too was martyred and thus became called Shahid ath-Thani
("The Second Martyr"). The famous book Sharh ul-lum'ah which has
been the primal textbook of the students of jurisprudence ever since is
the commentary of Shahid th-Thani. Other books of Shahid Awal include Durou,
Thikra, Bayan, Alfiyeh and Qawa'id. All of
the books of the First Martyr are amongst the priceless writings of jurisprudence.
Shahid Awal came from a very distinguished family, and the generations
that succeeded him preserved this honour. He had three sons who were all
'ulema and jurisprudents, and his wife and daughter were likewise jurisprudents.
Shaykh Ali ibn Abul ul-Ala Karaki, known as Muhaqqiq Karaki or Muhaqqiq
Thani. One of the Jabal 'Amal jurisprudents and one of the greatest of
the Shi'ite jurisprudents. He perfected his studies in Syria and Iraq and
then went to Iran and for the first time the position of Shaykh ul-lslam
went to Iran when it was entrusted to him. The order which the ruling king
of Iran (Shah Tahmaseb) wrote in Mutaqqiq Karaki's name in which the king
gave him complete control, declaring himself to be only his agent, is famous.
A well-known book that is often spoken of in jurisprudence is Muhaqqiq
Karaki's Jam'i ul-Muqasid, which is a commentary on the Qawa'id
of Allamah Hilli.
The arrival of Mutaqqiq Thani in Iran and his establishing a religious
university in Qazvin and then in Isfahan, together with his training of
outstanding pupils in jurisprudence, caused Iran for the first time since
the time of the Saduqayn to become a centre of Shi'ite jurisprudence. He
died between the years 937 A.H. a-nsl 941 A.H. He had been the pupil of
the pupil of Ibn Fahd Hilli, who had been the pupil of the pupils of Shahid
Awal, such as Fazlel Miqdad.
Shaykh Zayn ud-Din known as Shahid Thani, the "Second Martyr", was another
of the great Shi'ite jurisprudents. A master of several sciences, he was
from Jabal 'Amal and a descendant of a man called Saleh who was a student
of Allamah Hilli. Apparently Shahid Thani's family was from Tus, and sometimes
he would sign his name "At-Tusi Ash-Shami". He was born in 911 A.H. and
martyred in 966 A.H. He travelled widely and experienced many teachers.
He had been to Egypt, Syria, Hejaz, Jerusalem, Iraq and Istanbul, and wherever
he went he learnt. It has been recorded that his Sunni teachers alone numbered
twelve. Besides jurisprudence and principles he was accomplished in philosophy,
gnosis, medicine and astronomy. Very pious and pure, his students wrote
that he used to carry wood at nights to support his household and, in the
mornings, sit and teach. He compiled and wrote many books, the most famous
of them in jurisprudence being Sharh lum'a, his commentary on the
Lum'a of Shahid Awal. He was a pupil of Muhaqqiq Karaki (before
Muhaqqiq migrated to Iran), but Iran was one place that he himself never
went to. The author of M'alim which is about the Shi'ite 'ulema was Shahid
Thani's son.
Muhammad ibn Baqer ibn Muhammad Akmal Bahbahani, known as Wahid Bahbahani,
who came in the period after the fall of the Safavi dynasty of Iran. After
that overthrow, Isfahan was no longer the centre of religion, and some
of the 'ulema and jurisprudents, amongst them Seyyid Sadr ud-Din Razawi
Qumi, the teacher of Wahid Bahbahani, left Iran as the result of the Afghan
turmoil and went to the atabat, the holy centres of Iraq.
Wahid Bahbahani made Karbala the new centre and there he tutored numbers
of outstanding pupils, many of them famous in their own right. Besides
this it was he who led the intellectual combat against the ideas of the
akhbariyyin, which in those days were extremely popular. His defeat
of the akhbariyyin and his raising of so many distinguished mujtahids
has led to him being termed as "Ustad ul-kul" ("The General Teacher").
His virtue and piety was perfect and his students maintained profound respect
for him.
Shaykh Morteza Ansari, a descendant of Jaber ibn Abdullah Ansari, one
of the great companions of the Holy Prophet himself. On a visit with his
father to the atabat of Iraq at the age of twenty, the 'ulema, appreciating
his genius, asked his father to let him stay. He remained four years in
Iraq and studied there under the leading teachers. Then, due to a series
of unpleasant events, he returned to his home. After two years he went
once more to Iraq, stayed for two years, and again returned to Iran, this
time deciding to benefit from the 'ulema in Iran. He set off to visit Mashhad
and on the way visited Hajj Mulla Ahmad Nuraqi the author of the
famous Jam'i S'adat in Kashan. This visit became a long stay as
he benefitted from the teachings of Mulla Ahmad in Kashan for three years.
He then went to Mashhad and stayed there for five months. He also journeyed
to Isfahan and to Burujerd in Iran and the aim of all these trips was to
learn from men of knowledge. Around 1202/3 A.H. he went for the last time
to the atabat and began giving lessons. After the decease of Shaykh
Muhammad Hasan, he became recognised as the sole authority for referral
for verdicts.
Shaykh Ansari is called the Khatim ul fuqiha walmuitahidin (the
seal of the jurisprudents and the mujtahids). He was one of those who in
the precision and depth of his views have very few equals. Two of his books,
Risa'il and Mukassib are today's textbooks for (higher) religious
students, and many commentaries have been written on his books by later
'ulema. After Muhaqqiq Hilli and Allamah Hilli and Shahid Awal, Shaykh
Ansari is the first person whose books have been so regularly subject to
commentaries. He passed away in 1281 A.H., in Najaf where he is buried.
Hajj Mirza Muhammad Hasan Shirazi, known as Mirza Shirazi. His
preliminary studies took place in Isfahan and he then went to Najaf and
took part in the lessons of Shaykh Ansari and became one of the Shaykh's
leading and outstanding students. After Shaykh Ansari's demise, he became
the leading authority of the Shi'ite world, and he remained thus until
his demise about 23 years later. It was by means of this great man's prohibition
of tobacco that colonialism 's famous monopoly agreement in Iran was broken.
Hajj Mirza Husayn Naini, one of the great jurisprudents and master
of principles of the fourteenth century hejrat, a pupil of Mirza Shirazi,
who became a highly valuable teacher. His fame is mostly in Principles,
into which he introduced new views. Many of today's jurisprudents were
his pupils. He died in 1355 A.H. in Najaf. One of the books he wrote was
in Persian and was called Tanaziyeh al-ameh or Hukumat dar Islam,
which he wrote in defense of constitutional government and its roots in
Islam.
Summary and Review
In total we have introduced sixteen of the faces of the recognised jurisprudents
from the time of the minor occultation until the end of the 13th century
hejrat. We have only mentioned the jurisprudents that in the world of jurisprudence
and principles are very famous, whose names and fame have been continually
mentioned in lessons and books from their own times until today. Of course,
there are many other such names we could have mentioned, but from those
we have reviewed, certain points became clear:
First, ever since the third century A.H., jurisprudence
has had a continuous existence. Throughout the whole of these eleven centuries,
schools have operated with no period of stand-still and the relationship
between teacher-student in all that time has never been severed. If we
start with my own teacher, the late great Ayatollah Burujerdi, we can trace
the line of his teachers back over a thousand years to the period of the
Imams. Such a constant chain seems to have existed in no culture and civilisation
other than the Islamic one.
Of course, as we stated before, we did not appoint the third century
to begin with for the reason that Shi'ite jurisprudents began then, but
because the period previous to that period was the period of access to
the holy Imams, and during that time the brilliance of the Shi'ite jurisprudents
was always dimmed by the brilliance of the Imams, and the jurisprudents
had no independence of their own. Otherwise the beginnings of ijtihad
and jurisprudence amongst the Shi'ites and the composing of books about
jurisprudence occurred amongst the companions. The first treatise on jurisprudence
was written by Ali ibn Ali Raf'i who was the brother of Abdullah ibn Abi
Raf'i, the scribe and accountant of Amir ul Muminin, Ali ('a) during
the period of the Imam's caliphate.
Second, contrary to the perception of some, the Shi'ite
sciences, amongst them jurisprudence, have not been developed and systemised
solely by the 'ulema and jurisprudents of Iran. The 'ulema of Iran and
the 'ulema of other lands have both shared in this great work, and, until
the commencement of the tenth century and the emergence of the Safavi dynasty,
non-Iranians were predominant. It is only since the middle of the Safavi
period that predominance has been gained by Iranians.
Third, likewise, the centre of jurisprudence and of the
jurisprudents has not always been Iran. At first Baghdad was the centre
of Shi'ite jurisprudence, and then, by the action of Shaykh Tusi, the centre
was transferred to Najaf. It was not long before Jabal 'Amal in today's
south Lebanon became the centre. Then Hilleh, a small town in Iraq, and
then for a while Halab, one of the districts of Syria. During the time
of the Safavids it was transferred to Isfahan, while at the same time Najaf
was revived by Muqaddas Ardebili and other greats and still functions today.
Of the towns of Iran, it is only Qum that in the first centuries of Islam,
due to men like Ali ibn Babawayh, was a minor centre of jurisprudence and
the related studies while Baghdad was the main centre. During the time
of the Qajar dynasty, Qum was revived due to the efforts of Abul Qasim
Qumi and it was revived a second time in 1340 A.H. (i.e. 61 years before
this translation) by the late Shaykh Abdul Karim Ha'iri Yazdi, and today
it is one of the two great centres of Shi'ite jurisprudence. [2]
Fourth, the jurisprudents of Jabal 'Amal played an important
role in the development of Safavi Iran. The Safavi dynasty, as we know,
were inclined to Sufism. Their path was originally based on the methods
and customs peculiar to Sufism. If they had not been corrected by the profound
and unchallengable understanding of the jurisprudents of Jabal 'Amal, and
if a profound centre of Islamic studies not been established by those jurisprudents,
things would have led in Iran to the same kind of condition that now exists
in Turkey and Syria. This action of theirs had many effects. Firstly, the
population and government of Iran remained immune from that deviation,
and, secondly, Shi'ite Sufism likewise followed a more reasonable path.
Thus, for founding the religious university in Isfahan, the jurisprudents
of Jabal 'Amal-Muhaqqiq Karaki and others - have a lot to be thanked for.
Fifth, as has been pointed out by others, Shi'ism in Jabal
'Amal existed an age before it did in Iran, and this is one of the definite
proofs and reasons for rejecting the views of those who consider Shi'ism
to have been formed in Iran. Some believe that the Shi'ite penetration
into Lebanon was due to the great companion of the Prophet, the mujahid
Abuzar Ghaffari. During his stay in ancient Syria which included all or
part of present Lebanon, at the same time as stiffly opposing the misappropriation
of public wealth by Mu'awiyyah and the rest of Bani Umayyid, Abuzar also
used to propagate the holy platform of Shi'ism.
Lesson Four: The Sections and Chapters of the Issues of Jurisprudence
For us to form an acquaintance with jurisprudence it is necessary for
us to recognise its different sections. Previously we said that the range
of jurisprudence is extremely wide, for it contains all the subjects related
to all the actions about which Islam contains instructions.
The famous classification of today is the same classification first
introduced by Muhaqqiq Hilli in his Sharay'i and which Shahid Awal
has briefly commented on and explained in his Qawa'id. Amazingly
the most proficient of those who have composed commentaries of the book
Sharay'i amongst them Shahid Thani in his Masalik, made not
the slightest comment or explanation about the classification of Muhaqqiq,
and the First Shahid in Lum'a has not even followed Muhaqqiq's system
In any case, Muhaqqiq's classification is that all the issues of jurisprudence
are divided into four parts: worship, two-party contracts, one-party contracts
and (other) commands.
This division is based on the fact that the actions that must be performed
in accordance to the Shari'iah are either such that a condition of their
validity is the intention of nearness to God meaning that they must be
done solely for God and if there is any other motivation for their performance
the obligation is not fulfilled and they must be done again, or they are
not subject to this condition .
If they are of the first type, like prayer, fasting, khoms, zakat,
Hajj and so on, they are termed in jurisprudence as worship (ibadat).
If, however, they are of the second type and the intention of nearness
is not a condition of their validity, and, supposing that they are performed
with a different intention, are still correct and valid, then they are
of two types: either their actualisation does not depend upon the execution
of a special contract or it does.
Acts that do not depend upon the execution of a special contract, like
inheritance, punishments, retribution and so on, are grouped together in
jurisprudence under the heading commands, (ahkam). If they do depend
upon the execution of a contract, then again they are of two types: either
the contract must be recited by two parties, or there is no need for two
parties and the contract is unilateral.
If they are of the first type, like selling, hire, and marriage, they
are called contract (aqd), in which one party states the contract
and the other agrees. If, however, one person can carry it out alone with
no need of another party like the changing of one's mind regarding one's
due, divorce and so on, it is called unilateral instigation.
In this classification all the sections of jurisprudence have been divided
into fifty two chapters. Ten chapters of worship, nineteen of contracts,
eleven of unilateral instigations and twelve chapters of commands.
One point is not to remain unmentioned. In the first and second centuries
of Islam, the books of jurisprudence that were written were related to
one or a few of the subjects of jurisprudence, not about all the subjects.
For example, it is recorded that such and such a person wrote a book about
prayer and such and such a person a book about marriage. For this reason,
in later eras, when books about all the issues of jurisprudence were written,
the different chapters of jurisprudence were all under the heading The
Book. The custom is that instead of writing The Chapter of the Ritual Prayer,
or The Chapter of the Hajj, we write, The Book of Ritual Prayer
or the Book of Hajj.
Now, in the order first used by Muhaqqiq Hilli, we will look at the
different sections and chapters of the issues of jurisprudence.
Worship
There are ten books of worship:
The Book of Cleanliness (kitab ut-taharat).
Cleanliness is of two kinds: being clean of external, non-inherent,
material filth and pollution; and being spiritually clean of inherent pollution.
The first type of cleanliness means the body, clothes and other things
being clean from the ten types of filth which include urine, faeces, blood,
sperm, corpses and carcasses and so on and which are termed as najasat.
The second type of cleanliness means entering the state of purity by performing
the partial ablution, or total ablution or earth ablution, that is a condition
of certain forms of worship like prayer and circumambulation of the Ka'ba
and certain other things, and which is annulled by a series of natural
things like sleep, urination, sexual intercourse and simple sperm discharge,
and which must thereafter be re-entered.
The Book of Prayer (kitab us-salat).
In this book the obligatory prayers, i.e. the five daily ritual prayers,
the prayers of 'id ul fitr and 'id ul ahza, the prayer for
the deceased, the prayer of special signs such as earthquakes and eclipses,
etc. and the prayer of the circumambulation of the Ka'ba; the nafilah
prayers, i.e. the desirable prayers such as the daily desirable prayers;
the conditions, preparations, essentials, preventions, delayers and annulers
of prayer; and the qualities of prayer, such as the prayer of a person
at home and the prayer of a person ruled as travelling, individual prayer
and congregational prayer, the prayer offered at the right time (ida)
and the prayer missed and made up for after its time (qaza), are
all discussed in detail.
The Book of Zakat.
Zakat is a way of paying wealth that is similar to a tax and
which is due from nine things :gold, silver, wheat, barley, dates, grapes,
and animals of the cow family, animals of the sheep family, and animals
of the camel family. In jurisprudence the conditions for zakat being
due from these nine things; the amount of zakat due; and the ways
it is to be spent are all discussed and, from the authentic sources and
in the recognised ways, determined. In the Quran, zakat is mostly
mentioned along with prayer, hut only that it is to be given and the ways
it is to be spent has been explained; the rest is known from the Sunnah
.
The Book of Khoms.
Khoms, like zakat, is a way of paying wealth that resembles
a tax. Khoms means a fifth. In the view of the 'ulema of our Sunni
brothers it is only a fifth of the spoils of war that is to be transferred
to the Bait ul-mal, or public treasury of Islam, and it is to be spent
for the public benefit. In the Shi'ite view, however, spoils of war is
just one of the things from which khoms must be paid. In addition,
profits of mining, the finding of buried treasure and of diving in the
sea, wealth that is mixed with illegitimate wealth when unable to discern
the amount and/or the owner, land that a thimmi kafir [3 ]buys from
a Muslim, and that which exceeds one's yearly expenses from one's yearly
earnings, must all be divided into five and one of those fifths be given
as khoms. Khoms in the Shi'ite path of religion is the great
budget that can secure the important part of the budget of the state.
The Book of Fasting (kitab us-sawm).
As we know, in a state of fasting, one must refrain from eating and
drinking, from sexual intercourse, from immersing one's head in water,
from breathing in dust (even as far as the throat) and from certain other
things. For one month each lunar year, the blessed month of Ramazan,
is obligatory for every mature, sane person who is not ruled as an exception
(like a ruled traveller or a woman having her monthly period) to fast each
day from daybreak until sundown. Other than in the month of Ramazan
fasting is generally desirable. On the two festivals, fasting is forbidden,
and on certain other days, like the day of 'Ashura, it is undesirable (makruh).
The Book of Taking Seclusion (i'tikaf)
This literally means "to reside in a specified place" In the terminology
of jurisprudence, however, it means a type of worship whereby a person
resides in a mosque for three days or more, not setting foot out of the
mosque, and fasting each day. This has laws and conditions that are determined
in jurisprudence. In its essence i'tikaf is desirable, not obligatory,
but if it is begun and kept up for two days, the third day becomes obligatory.
I'tikaf is to be performed in the Masjid ul-Haram in Mecca or the
Masjid un-Nabi in Medina, or in the masjid of Kufa in Iraq or the masjid
of Basreh in Iraq, or at least in the major masjid of a city. I'tikaf
in minor masjids is not perm issable. The Holy Prophet used to perform
i'tikaf during the final days of the month of Ramazan.
The Book of Hajj
Hajj is that famous act of worship performed in Mecca and the
outskirts of Mecca that is normally linked to 'umrah. The performance
of the Hajj consists of binding ihram[4]
upon oneself in Mecca, a stay in 'Arafat, a stay for a night in Mash'ar,
the symbolic ceremony of throwing stones at the furthest (of three) boulders,
the sacrifice, the shaving of the head for men and the cutting of a few
curls for women, circumambulation (walking seven times around the Holy
Ka'ba), the prayer of the circumambulation, the walking of seven times
between the two hills of Safa and Marwah, the final circumambulation, the
prayer of the final circumambulation, throwing stones at (all three of)
the boulders, and the night stays at Mina.
The Book of Umrah.
Umrah is a kind of lesser Pilgrimage. Normally it is obligatory
for those about to perform the Hajj to perform the Hajj 'Umrah
first. The actions of 'umrah are as follows:
Binding "ihram" on oneself at one of the special places (mi'qat);
cicumambulation; the prayer of circumambulation; walking seven times between
Safa and Marwa; and, finally, the cutting of a few hairs or a fingernail
or toe nail.
The Book of Jihad.
This book deals with the issues concerning Islamic warfare. Islam is
a religion of society and community and of the responsibilities of society,
and for this reason it includes a law of jihad. There are two types of
jihad: ibtida'i (to be begun by Muslims) and defa'i (defensive).
In the view of Shi'ite jurisprudence, ibteda'i jihad can only take
shape under the direction of the Holy Prophet or one of the twelve immaculate
and perfect Imams, otherwise it is forbidden. This type of jihad is obligatory
only on men, but the other jihad, the jihad of defense, is obligatory on
both men and women whenever the conditions demand it.
In the same way, jihad can be either internal or external. If some of
the people for whom obedience to the Imam is obligatory rise up against
him, just as the Khawarij at Nahrawan and other places, Talha and Zubayr
at the battle of Jamal and Mu'awiyyah and his companies at Siffin all rose
up against Amir ul-Muminin, Ali, internal jihad is also obligatory against
them.
In jurisprudence, the laws of jihad and of thimmeh, the conditions
for allowing non-Muslims to live in the Islamic state as citizens of the
state, and of peace between the Islamic state and non-Islamic states are
all discussed in detail.
10. The Book Commending to what is Recognized:-as good-and Prohibiting
from what is Rejected-as bad (amr bi m 'aruf wa nahyan al-munkar)
Because Islam is a religion of society and of the responsibilities of
society, and sees its orderly environment as the essential condition for
the enaction of its heavenly programs and the bestowing of prosperity and
fulfilment, it has brought into existence a shared general responsibility.
We are all duty-bound to be guardians of virtue and goodness, and to combat
evils and wrongs. The guarding of virtue and goodness is named amr
bi m'aruf and the combating of evil and wrongs, nahyan al-munkar.
The conditions attached to these duties and their stipulations and regulations
are all stated in jurisprudence.
Here, our concise glimpse at the ten parts of the section of worship
comes to an end, and it is now the turn of the contracts.
Lesson Five: Contracts ('oqud)
The second section, according to our classification, consists of the
contracts and includes nineteen books:
The Book of Buying and Selling (kitab ul-bay'i)
This book deals with buying and selling, the conditions which the two
parties (the buyer and seller) must meet, the conditions of the two commodities
exchanged, the conditions of the contract and the type of transaction:
cash transactions; nisiyah transactions which are transactions wherein
a commodity is given cash and the payment after a periodand salaf transactions
which are the opposite of nisiyah transactions, i.e. a sale wherein
payment is immediate and the commodity is not put at the buyers disposal
until after a period. Transactions wherein both the payment and the product
are to be exchanged after a period are null and void. Similarly, in the
chapter of selling, advantageous transfers, disadvantageous transfers and
advantageless transfers are also discussed. What is meant by advantageous
transfer (marabihah) here is that a person makes a transaction and
then, after having made some profit, transfers it to someone else. A disadvantageous
transfer (muwadah) is the opposite, meaning a transaction which,
after having suffered some loss and damage, is transferred to someone else.
And what is meant by an advantageless transfer (tuwliyah) is that
a transaction is transferred to someone else having made no profit nor
having suffered any loss.
The Book "Rahn".
Rahn means mortgage. In this book of jurisprudence the laws of
mortgaging are studied.
The Book of the Bankrupt (muflis)
Muflis means "the bankrupt", i.e. a person whose holdings do
not meet his liabilities. In order to investigate the liabilities of such
a person, the Hakim-Shari'ah i.e. a mujtahid, can prohibit him from
the right to his possessions until an exact investigation is made and as
far as possible the liabilities be paid.
The Book of Prohibition (hajr)
Hajr means prohibition. What is meant is the prohibition of making
use of property. In many cases, the use of property by the original owner
is prohibited. As we have seen, the bankrupt is one instance. Another is
an immature child (i.e. a girl under nine or a boy under fifteen). The
insane, the person sane in other ways Ibut who always spends his money
foolishly like spending all his money on clothes when he is desperately
in need of food, are other instances.
The Book of Liability (diman)
Liability is that a person accepts the liability of another person's
debts. There exists a difference between Shi'ite jurisprudents and the
jurisprudents of our Sunni brothers about the reality of liability. In
the view of Shi'ite jurisprudents diman is the transferrence of
the obligation of a debt from the debtor to a party that accepts liability,
and is only valid with the consent of the creditor, and in Shi'ite jurisprudence,
once the liability has been transferred, the creditor has no longer the
right to seek it from the person who has made himself liable. Of course,
if the liability was urged on the liable by the debtor, then, once he has
cleared the debt, the liable can take that amount from the first debtor.
In the view of Sunni jurisprudence, however, it is the annexing of the
obligation of the debt onto someone else, who also becomes obliged to repay
the debt. Which means that after the contract of liability, the creditor
has both the right to seek the debt from the original debtor and also from
the person who has made himself liable.
Sometimes two other chapters, hawalih (another kind of liability)
and kafalah (a kind of bail system) are also included in this book.
The Book of Peace (sulh)
The sulh (peace) that is studied in this book is different from
the sulh that is studied in the book of jihad. Sulh in the book
of jihad means "political agreements", whereas the Book of Peace concerns
property affairs and common rights. For example, if a debt is owed without
the amount of the debt being precisely known, the two parties make a sulh
agreement and settle on a specified sum. Sulh agreements generally
occur as a settlement for arguments and disagreements.
The Book of Partnerships (sharikat)
Sharikat is that a property or a right belongs to more than one person.
For example, if some brothers inherit their father's property, then, for
as long as they do not divide it, they are partners in that property. Or,
for example, two people together buy an automobile or a house or a piece
of land. Or it may happen that a group of people together take possession
of a piece of land that belongs to no one by reclaiming, say, and restoring
a part of a desert or marshland. Furthermore, a partnership is sometimes
accidentally forced on someone, like, for example, when the wheat of two
farmers accidentally becomes mixed and to separate the wheat of one from
the wheat of the other is not possible.
There are two types of partnership existing in Islam, contractual partnership
and non-contractual. The examples previously cited were non-contracted
partnerships. A contractual partnership is that two people or a group of
people by an agreement, compact and contract, form what in English is called
a company, such as a trading company, a farming company or an industrial
company. Contractual partnerships or companies are subject to many laws
which are still studied in jurisprudence. In the Book of Partnerships the
laws of profit sharing are also discussed.
The Book of the Partnership of Capital and Labor (mudarabah)
A mudarabah is a kind of contractual partnership, but not a partnership
of two or more investors. Rather it is a partnership of capital and labour,
meaning that one one or more partners provide the capital for a trading
business and one or more partners provide the labour of the actual trading.
Firstly the partners must be in concord as to the division of profits,
and then the contract of mudarabah is to be executed, or must at
least be formed in practice.
The Book of Agricultural Partnerships (mazaro'at and musaqat)
Mazara'at and musaqat are two more types of partnership.
They are like mudarabah, which we have just mentioned, in that they
are both types of partnerships between capital and labour. The difference
is that mudarabah is relevant to trading whereas muzara'at
is for farming. The meaning of this is that the owner of land and water
makes an agreement with someone else who does the actual farming and they
are in concord as to the specified proportion of each party in the division
of the profits. Likewise, musaqat is for the affairs of orchards.
This means that the owner of fruit trees concludes an agreement with someone
else who becomes responsible for all the work involved in looking after
those trees, such as watering them and all the other things effective in
fruit production, and, according to the specified proportion they agree
upon in the actual agreement, both investor and worker take their share
of the profits.
Here there is a point that wish to mention, which is that in partnerships
between capital and labour, whether mardarabah agreements or mazara'at
or musaqat, any kind of harm or loss the capital is subject to is
born by the owner of the capital, the investor. And, likewise, there is
also no certainty of making a profit on the capital, meaning that it is
possible a profit will be returned, and it is possible that a profit will
not be returned. The only profit that is returned to the owner of the capital
is in accordance to the profit made by the partnerships and to his specified
proportion of those profits. Here it is that the financer, just like the
worker, might make no profit, and it is even possible that he may lose
his capital and even become bankrupt.
In the world of today, however, even in most parts of the Muslim world,
bankers put their aims into practice by means of usury and as a result
they receive a specified profit in all circumstances, whatever the types
of concern they finance. Should one of the concerns that they have financed
return a loss instead of a profit, the manager of that concern is absolutely
obliged to return the banker's profit, even if he has to sell his house.
Likewise, in the system of most of today's world, the financer never goes
bankrupt; on the basis of the system of usury the financer has entrusted
his capital to the hands of the manager, which the manager has to repay
many times over, and whatever happens the banker demands that profit, even
if the capital has suffered a misfortune or even been lost.
In Islam, profiting from capital in the form of usury, i.e. the action
of lending money and demanding the repayment of the loan whatever the circumstances
with an addition of an amount of profit is strictly and severely prohibited
.
The Book of Trusts (wadiy'ah)
Wadiy'ah, or trust, means the entrusting of property with someone
and making that person one's agent in keeping and safe-guarding it. This
in turn creates duties for the trustee and, if the property suffers or
is lost, and the trustee has performed and observed those duties, he is
not liable.
The Book of Lending (ariyah)
Ariyah is that a person receives the property of a second person
in order to benefit from its benefits. Ariyah and wadiy'ah
are two types of trusts, but in wadiy'ah the owner entrusts his
property to be kept and safe-guarded and without his permission the trustee
has no right to make use of it in any way. Ariyah, however, is that
the owner from the very beginning gives it to the other for him to use
and then return.
The Book of Hire (ijareh)
In Islam there are two types of hire, either it is that a person cedes
the benefit of his property to another in return for an amount of money
which is called "the money of hire" (mal-ijareh), such as the normal
practices of hiring out one's house or car; or it is that a person hires
himself and, in the terms of jurisprudence, becomes ajir; which
means that he makes an understanding that in return for carrying out a
special work, like repairing a pair of shoes, cutting a person's hair,
or building his house and so on, he will receive a wage. or payment. Hire
is similar to buying and selling in as far as both involve an exchange.
The difference is that in buying and selling the exchange is of a thing
and money, while in hire the exchange is of the benefit of a thing and
money. Hire also has an aspect in common with 'ariyah in that both
the hirer and the 'ariyah trustee make use of a benefit, the difference
being that the hirer, having paid the price of the hire, is the owner of
the benefit, while the 'ariyah trustee is not the owner of the benefit,
he only has the right to make use of it.
The Book of Representatives (wakalah)
Sometimes it occurs that one needs to have a representative for those
works which demand a contract. Marriage and divorce are good examples,
for the contracts of marriage and divorce must be verbally recited in correct
and valid Arabic the person who is represented is called the muwakkil
and the representative is called the wakil, while the act of respresentation
itself is called takwil.
The Book of Endowments and Charity (waqf and sadaqat)
An endowment is that which a person sets aside from his property for
a special use. In defining waqf it has been said that it means safe-guarding
the original article of waqf, making it untransferrable, while freeing
its benefits. About whether an intention of qorbat, of nearness
to God, is a condition of waqf or not there is a difference of opinion.
The fact that it is included in this section is because Muhaqqiq Hilli
did not consider the intention of qorbat to be an essential condition.
In any case, there are two types of waqf, general\ waqf,
and special waqf. Both these and the commands of charity are discussed
in detail.
The Book of Temporary Endowments (sukna and habs)
Sukna and habs are similar to waqf with the difference
that in waqf the original property or wealth is guarded forever
and there is no longer any possibility of it being someone's property,
whereas habs is that a person designates the benefits of his property
for a specified period to be spent in a charitable way, and after that
period it again becomes his personal property. Sukna however, is
that a person designates a dwelling for the use of a poor, deserving person
for a period and at the end of that period it becomes exactly the same
as the owner's other property .
The Book of Giving (hebat)
One of the effects of ownership is that one has the right to give one's
property to others. Giving is of two types: "in exchange" and "not in exchange".
Not in Exchange means that in return for one's gift one receives nothing
in return. Giving in Exchange, however, means that one receives something
in return for one's gift. Something given in exchange is not retrievable,
i.e. it cannot be taken back. When something is given not in exchange,
however, if it is given between the mahram members of a family, or if the
gift itself is lost or broken, it cannot be taken back, otherwise it can,
and the giver can nullify the transaction.
The Book of Wagers (sabq and rimayah)
Sabq and rimayah are two forms of betting agreement between
the competitors of horse races, camel races or shooting competitions. Sabq
and rimayah are forms of gambling, yet, because they are for practicing
the martial arts necessary for jihad, they have been counted by Islam as
permissable encouragement for the actual participants. Of course, this
permission does not extend to other than the participants.
The Book of Wills (wasiyat)
This book is related to the enjoinments that a person wills to be performed
after his death regarding his wealth or his children, whose guardian he
is. Each person has the right to appoint a person as his executor (wasi)
to be the guardian of minors amongst his children after his death; to supervise
their education and other affairs. In the same way, each person also has
the right to have spent after his death up to a third of his wealth in
accordance with the stipulations he makes in his will.
The Book of Marriage (nikah)
First the conditions of the actual contract are discussed, such as the
muharam, the people for whom to marry each other is forbidden, such
as father and daughter, mother and son, brother and sister, and so on.
The two types of marriage are included: permanent and temporary. Disobedience
to the husband by the wife and the ill-treating of the wife by the husband
and the obligation of the man of the house to economically provide for
his wife and children are part of this book. There are a few other issues
that are also discussed.
Lesson Six: Unilateral Instigations (iyqa'at)
This part, according to the classification we are following, consists
of iyqa'at, which, as has been explained, are the actions in need
of a contract, but not of a two sided contract; a unilateral contract is
enough. There are fifteen of these:
The Book of Divorce (talaq)
Divorce here means the cancelling of the marriage compact by the husband.
Divorce is either ba'in or raj'i. Ba'in is the kind of divorce
wherein the man has no right to return to the woman. A raj'i divorce
is that in which the man can return. What this means is that for as long
as the woman's special period of restraint ('iddah) has not come
to an end, the man can return to the woman and thus nullify the divorce.
A divorce is a ba'in divorce either because the wife has no 'iddah,
like a divorced woman with whom the husband has not had sexual intercourse,
or a woman who has reached the age of menopause, or because, even though
the woman must keep 'iddah, the nature of the divorce disqualifies
the man's right to return, like the third consecutive divorce of that couple,
in which case, until she marries someone else who has sexual intercourse
with her and then himself dies or divorces her and she keeps another 'iddah,
the first husband cannot re-marry her.
It is a condition of divorce firstly that, at the time of the divorce,
the woman is clean of her monthly period. Secondly, there must be two just
witnesses present when the contract of divorce is recited. Divorce is divinely
detested. The Prophet of God tells us :"The most-detested permissable (thing)
before God is divorce".
The Book of Divorce Wholly or Partly Instigated by the Wife (khul'a
and mabarat)
Khul'a and mabarat are two types of ba'in divorce.
A khul'a divorce is a divorce motivated due to the wife being dissatisfied
with the marriage and giving the husband something or by releasing him
from all or part of the mehr [5]
so as to persuade him to divorce her. In this case, just by the man divorcing
his wife, he is disqualified from returning to her, unless she wants to
take back what she ceded, in which case the man has the right to return
to her.
Mabarat is also a type of ba'in divorce, like khul'a
with the difference that both parties are dissatisfied with the marriage,
while the wife still gives the husband a sum to divorce her. The other
difference is that the given sum in khul'a divorce has no specified
limit, but in mabarat it is a condition that the sum be not more
than the amount of the mehr.
The Book of Illegal Divorce (zahar)
In the "ignorance" of pre-Islamic Arabia, zahar was a kind of
divorce consisting of the husband saying to the wife anti 'aliya kazohriammi,
i.e., "You are like the rear of my mother to me." And this was quite enough
for the wife to be recognised as divorced. Islam changed this. In the view
of Islam, zahar is not divorce. For a man to recite this contract
to his wife is forbidden, and he must pay a fine (kafarah). Until
he pays the fine it is forbidden for him to have sexual intercourse with
the wife. The fine of zahar is the freeing of a slave, or, if not
possible, fasting each day for two consecutive months, or, if this is not
possible, the feeding of sixty poor people.
The Book of Vows of Abstention (Iyl'a)
Iyl'a is a general word meaning oath, but in jurisprudence it
has a special meaning, which is that in order to annoy his wife, a man
recites a contract swearing that he will not have sexual intercourse with
her ever again or for a fixed period (four months or more). If the wife
protests to the Hakim Shari'ah, he will oblige the man to one of two things:
break the vow or divorce his wife. If the man breaks his vow, he must,
of course, pay the fine. To break a vow is always forbidden but in these
circumstances it is obligatory.
The Book of Cursing (l'aan)
L'aan is again related to the marital affairs of man and wife.
It means their cursing of each other, and it applies to a situation wherein
the husband accuses his wife of immorality, meaning here adultery or lesbianism.
If someone accuses a woman of the said immorality and cannot produce
four just witnesses, the punishment of falsely accusing is to be carried
out upon that person himself, and the same applies if a man accuses his
wife. Now, if the man accuses his wife and cannot produce four witnesses,
then rather than punish him, something else can be done. What can be done
is called l'aan. If this takes place, however, although he is no
longer subject to the other punishment, his wife becomes forbidden to him
forever.
L'aan takes place in front of the Hakim Shari'ah. As we said
before, l'aan is a way in which the two parties curse each other.
It takes place like this: first the man stands up in front of the Hakim
and says four times, "God is my witness, I am truthful in my claim." The
fifth time he says, "God curse me if I lie in my claim." The woman then
stands up in the presence of the Hakim and says four times, "I call God
as a Witness that in his claim he is a liar." The fifth time she says,
"The Anger of God be upon me if in his claim he is truthful."
The Book of Freeing (itq)
Freeing means the freeing of slaves. In Islam a series of legislatures
has been introduced about slaves. Other than the making of slaves of captives
taken in war, Islam considers no other form of slavery as legitimate. Furthermore,
the aim of taking slaves in Islam is not to profit from them, rather it
is for them to stay for a period in the homes of genuine Muslims and come
to understand the Islamic teachings. This, all by itself, would draw them
to the appreciation and acceptance of Islam and its sublime teachings.
In reality, this form of slavery is the passage between the slavery of
disbelief (kufr) and the freedom of Islam. So the aim is not that
slaves remain slaves forever, the aim is for them to fully discover the
Islamic teachings and their liberating effect, and earn the real, spiritual
freedom in the freedom of society. Therefore, freedom after slavery is
the aim of Islam.
Islam has provided many systems of itq. Because the goal of Islam
is freeing and not enslaving, the jurisprudents have titled the book dealing
with slavery the Book of Freeing and not the Book of Enslaving.
The Book of Acquiring Freedom through Will, by Purchase and Through
Relationship (Tadbir, mukatibeh and istilad)
Tadbir, mukatibeh and istilad are three of the
ways in which slaves are freed. Tadbir is that the owner stipulates
in his will that after his death his slave is free. Mukatibeh is
that a slave settles an agreement with his owner that by paying a sum (or
agreeing to pay a sum in the future) he will become free. In the Quran
it has been stipulated that if such an application is made by a slave in
whom good is discerned, meaning that belief is discerned in them, (or that
it is discerned that they can manage themselves and not become helpless),
not only is the application to be accepted but they are also to be given
capital from their owners' wealth.
Istilad concerns a slave woman who is made pregnant by her owner.
Such a woman, when the owner dies, definitely becomes part of the inheritance,
a part of which is inheritated by her child, and since no one can be the
slave of one's parents, grandparents and so on up, or children and grandchildren
and so on down, she automatically becomes free.
Similarly, there are many other ways slaves become free, such as a slave
being afflicted by blindness and so on; as the kafarah (fine) of
various sins, one of the forms of which, as we have seen, is freeing a
slave; being freed by someone simply to please God; and others, and these
are generally discussed in the Book of Freeing.
The Book of Confessing (iqrar)
Iqrar is related to the Islamic laws of arbitration. One of the
means by which a case is proved against a person is the person's own confession.
If, for example, a person claims that he is owed something by a second
person, he must produce evidence or testimony, and, if he does not, his
claim is rejected. Should, however, the second person himself confess to
the debt, this confession renders evidence and testimony unnecessary. Confession
is accepted only from sane adults.
The Book of Reward (ja'alah)
Reward in its essence is similar to the hiring of people. In hire, however,
a specific person is hired to do a specific work in return for a specific
sum, whereas in reward no certain person is hired. Instead, the hirer simply
announces that whoever does a certain work for him (like finding his missing
child, for example) will be paid a certain sum as a reward.
The Book of Vows (ayman)
If a person swears to do a certain thing, the doing of that which he
has sworn to do becomes obligatory for him. One condition is that the vow
is in the Name of God. Therefore, a vow made in the name of the Prophet
or of an Imam or the Quran, is not binding on him according to the Divine
Law. Another condition is that what he vows to do is ruled as permissable
in the Shari'ah, so a vow to do something that is ruled as forbidden (haram)
or repulsive (makruh), is meaningless and not at all binding. A
legitimate vow would be like one swearing to study a certain beneficial
book from beginning to end, or swearing to brush one's teeth at least once
a day. The breaking of such a vow necessitates a fine (kafarah).
The Book of Taking an Oath (nathr)
Nathr is a type of undertaking to do something that involves
an oath but no special contract. If, for example, one makes an oath to
pray all the daily nafilah prayers, i.e. the encouraged prayers
that accompany the obligatory prayers of the day, all one has to do is
declare that one will pray the nafilah prayers. As we saw, one of
the condition of the ayman vows was that the object of the vow be
not forbidden (haram) or repulsive (makruh), so that there
is no obstacle to the vow being simply permissable. The condition of nathr,
however is that the object of the vow be useful in some way. So any nathr
to do something or to refrain from something which is not beneficial, meaning
that the doing and the refraining from the action in question, are both
equal, is void. As in the ayman vows, the breaking of a nathr
warrants a fine.
The inner meaning of ayman and nathr, and of the necessity
of acting in accordance to them, lies in the fact that both are types of
compact with God, and, in the same way that one must respect one's compacts
with the creatures of God ("O you who believe, be loyal to your compacts".
15:1]), so is one to respect one's compacts with God Himself. An ayman
or a nathr is normally made when one has little confidence in one's
willpower. By means of the ayman or nathr one makes a thing
obligatory for oneself until one is able to form the desired habit. [6]
Lesson Seven: Laws
The ninth section of the four sections of jurisprudence consists of
the issues grouped under the heading of 'laws' (ahkam). This word
used here has no special definition. The fact is that those issues of jurisprudence
that do not fall into one of the other three groupings have been grouped
together to form this one. This section contains twelve books:
The Book of Hunting and Slaughtering (sayd and thibh)
First it is necessary to state that the meat of permitted meat animals
becomes permitted either when the animal is slaughtered in a special way
(thibh or nahr), or, if the animal is a wild animal the meat
of which is permitted, when it is properly hunted by specially trained
dogs or my means of an iron missile (like a sharp arrowhead or a sharp
bullet).
The meat of tame permitted-meat animals is not permissable to eat if
they are hunted, and they must be slaughtered in exact accordance to the
Shari'ah. The way of slaughtering most tame animals, like hens, sheep and
cows, etc., is called thibh and the way of slaughtering camels is
called nahr. There is a slight difference between the actual acts
of nshr and thibh, but the conditions, such as the slaughterer being
a Muslim, and killing the animal in the Name of God, are the same.
Hunting is related to permitted meat animals that are wild, like deer
and mountain goats, etc If the means by which the animal is hunted is a
dog, the dog must be so trained that it will do whatever it is commanded,
and thus reflect its master's will, and the meat of permittedmeat animals
that are hunted and killed by dogs that are not trained in this way must
not be eaten. In the same way, hunting with animals other than dogs, like
hawks, is also not permissable.
In hunting by non-animals means, it is a condition that the weapon be
iron, or at least metal, and it must be so sharp that it kills the animal
by its sharpness. So hunting with stones and blunt metal missiles is not
permissable. In both forms of hunting, just like in both forms of slaughtering,
the conditions that the man responsible for the animal's death, he the
hunter, be a Muslim, and that he begins in the Name of God, must be met
for the meat of that animal to be permissable. There are other conditions
but they are detailed and here is not their place.
The Book of Eating and Drinking
Islam has a series of instructions concerning the gifts of nature as
regarding eating and drinking. The laws of slaughtering and hunting are
amongst these, and so are the laws of eating and drinking. In the view
of Islam, all good things, i.e. things that are beneficient and useful,
are permitted, while all foul things, things that are not beneficial and
which are abominable for man, are forbidden. Furthermore, Islam has not
contented itself with explaining these generalities but has made it clear
that a whole group of things are foul and must be shunned, and that other
things are good and there is no obstacle to the making use of them.
Eating means either the eating of meat or the eating of other things.
Meat is either from the creatures of the sea or of the land or of the air.
Of the creatures of the sea only fish are permissable, and then again only
the fish that have scales. [7]
The creatures of the land are of two types: tame and wild. The tame animals,
the meat of which is permissable to eat are cows, sheep, camels, hens,
horses, donkeys and mules which are all permissable, though the eating
of the meat of horses, donkeys and mules is undesirable (makruh).
The meat of dogs and cats and pigs is forbidden. Of the wild animals, the
meat of carnivorous animals and insects is forbidden. The meat of deer,
however, and of wild cows and goats and other wild animals that are permissable
when tame, is permissable. The meat of hares and rabbits, though they are
not carnivorous, in accordance to the famous verdict of the 'ulema is forbidden.
Of birds, the meat of the different types of pigeon, partridge, ducks,
domestic hens and so on are permissable. The meat of hunting birds is forbidden.
In the cases where the Shari'ah has not made clear the status of the
meat of birds, there are two signs of its being forbidden. One is that
when the bird flies it does not need to flap it's wings all the time and
mostly glides. The other is that it has no crop, or no gizzard or no sign
of a bump on the back of its leg.
Other than animals: to eat or drink any kind of intrinsic filth (najasat)
like urine, faeces, blood, sperm, alcohol, etc., is forbidden, and the
same applies to any intrinsically clean thing that intrinsic filth has
dirtied and which is called mutunajas. Similarly, to eat or drink
anything that is harmful to the body, the harm of which is considered significant
like poison, for example, is also forbidden . If medicine discerns that
a certain thing, tobacco for example, is definitely harmful to the body,
to the heart, let's say, or to the nerves, and shortens one's life expectation
or produces cancer, then its use will be forbidden. If it is not consequential,
however, and is simply like breathing the air of most cities, it is not
forbidden .
For a pregnant woman to consume something which leads to the abortion
of her child, or for a person to consume something that leads to disorder
of the senses, or for a man to consume something that leads to his sterilization,
or for a woman to consume something that leads to her permanent sterility,
is forbidden.
To eat earth is absolutely forbidden, whether it is harmful or not.
The drinking of intoxicating liquors is also absolutely forbidden. Furthermore,
to consume that which belongs to another without the consent of the owner
is strictly forbidden, but this is an incidental prohibition, not intrinsic.
Some parts of permitted-meat animals is forbidden, including the spleen,
the testicles and generative parts. Likewise, the milk of forbidden-meat
animals is also forbidden .
The Book of Mis-Appropriation (ghasb)
Mis-appropriation (ghasb) means the taking or using of the property
of another by force, i.e. without the other's permission. Firstly, this
is forbidden. Secondly, it renders the mis-appropriator (ghasib)
liable, so that if the property is damaged or destroyed while in the control
of that misappropriator he is liable for it whether the loss or damage
was his fault or not. Whatever use one makes of mis-appropriated property
is forbidden. Wuzu taken with mis-appropriated water and prayer
in mis-appropriated clothes or in a mis-appropriated place is void.
At this point, it must be known that in the same way mis-appropriation
results in liability, so destruction causes liability. Meaning, for example,
that if a person smashes someone else's window, he is liable for it. Causing
likewise, produces liability. Causing here means that if someone does not
do any direct damage, like smashing a window, but does something that causes
damage, he is liable. If a man, for example, leaves a thing like the skin
of some fruits on a public walk-way and a person slips on it and as a consequence
suffers dam age, that man is responsible for the damage suffered by the
person who slipped.
The Book of Right of Preference (shaf'ih)
Shaf'ih means the right of precedence of one partner to buy the
share of the other. If two people are legitimate partners according to
the Shari'ah and one of them wants to sell his share, the other partner,
if he wants to buy that share for the same terms and price for which others
wish to purchase it, has the right of precedence.
The Book of Enlivening the Dead (ihiya al'muwt)
This book concerns wasteland, i.e. land that is dead or barren, that
by the absence of buildings or farming and suchlike is lifeless. The Holy
Prophet told us: "Whoever enlivens a dead land owns it." This issue has
many facets and these, in jurisprudence, are discussed at length.
The Book of Finds
In this book are discussed the laws of finding things the owners of
which are not known. The find is either an animal or other than an animal.
If it is an animal and such as will not be harmed if left alone, the finder
has no right to take it into his control. If the animal might be harmed
if left alone, however, like a sheep in the middle of the desert, the finder
can take it into his control, but he must search for its owner. If the
owner is found, the animal must be returned to him, and if the owner is
not found, with the permission of the Hakim Shari'ah, the animal must be
given to the poor.
If the find is not an animal, and its value is less than that of 2.32
grams [8] of minted silver, the
finder can keep it for himself, but if it is more he must search for the
owner for one year (unless, like fruit, it cannot be kept for a year).
If the owner is not found, and if the find was not made in the sacred area
of Mecca, the finder has the option of doing any of three things. Either
he can use it for himself with the intention that if the owner is discovered,
he will repay the find itself or its value to the owner, or give it as
charity with the same intention, or he can keep it in the hope that the
owner will be found.
If the find has no special signs the search for the owner is not necessary
and the finder has the same three options from the time of the find.
The Book of Inheritance.
We know that in Islam there are laws of inheritance. Inheritance in
Islam is not a matter of choice. In Islam, a person has no right to specify
a certain sum for a certain heir, or, for example, to leave all his wealth
to a certain heir. After a person's death, his wealth (apart from "his"
third which he can stipulate in a will to be disposed of however he likes)
is divided and shared amongst the heirs in accordance to the relevant laws.
The heirs in the view of Islam form different ranks. By the existence
of one of the members of the first rank, the inheritance does not reach
to the second, and the third rank only inherits if there is no one from
the first and second ranks to inherit.
The first rank consists of the deceased's parents and sons and daughters
and, if the sons and daughters have died, the grandchildren.
The second rank is the deceased's four grandparents and brothers and
sisters and, if the brothers and sisters have themselves passed away, their
children.
The third rank is the deceased's uncles and aunts and their children.
Until here, of course, we have spoken only about inheritance of kin.
There is other inheritance as well, the inheritance of husband and wife,
and they inherit their share one from the other before the inheritance
of any of the three ranks. About what is the share of each of the members
of the ranks and of the husband and wife, however, is too detailed a subject
to go into here.
The Book of Arbitration (qaza)
The issues of arbitration, i.e. the settling in court of differences
and disputes, are so many that we cannot even summarise them. Briefly,
we can say that the system of arbitration in Islam is a special system.
The justice of the arbitrator (qazi) is subject to extraordinary
attention in Islam. So much precision has been given to the knowledgeable
personality of the arbitrator that he has to be a mujtahid and an
expert on Islamic rights. About his moral and ethical competence, endless
diligence has been introduced. He must be free from all types of sin, even
those that do not directly affect his work. In no way does he have any
right to accept payment from either of the two parties, even after the
arbitration. His expenses are to be liberally reimbursed from the public
treasury. The position of the judge is to be so respected that the parties
of the case to be arbitrated, whoever they may be (even a caliph, as the
history of Amir ul-Muminin, Ali, so clearly shows), must both present themselves
before the judge with perfect respect for his position and in no way expect
or demand partiality. Confession, testimonial and, in some cases, oaths
play an important role in the Islamic arbitration system.
The Book of Testimony
This book is connected to the Book of Arbitration in the same way that
the Book of Confession is. If a person claims something, the other party
either admits it or denies it. If he admits it, this is sufficient for
the claim of the claimant to be proved and for the arbitrator to reach
his verdict. If he denies it, the claimant is bound to produce testimony,
and if he produces the testimony and it meets the conditions stipulated
in the Shari'ah, his claim is proved. The denier is not bound to produce
testimony .
In certain circumstances, the denier is bound to swear an oath, and
if he swears an oath his prosecution is to go no further. In jurisprudence,
it is said, "Testimony upon the claimant, and an oath upon whoever denies
it." The issues of arbitration are so many that books have been written
solely on this subject that are as voluminous as some of the great books
written on all the subjects of jurisprudence.
The Book of Punishments (hudud and t'azirat)
This book is about Islamic punishments in the same way that the previous
two books were about Islamic arbitration. Some of the systems of punishment
have been precisely defined and determined in Islam, and these are to be
performed in the same way regardless of the conditions and any other factors.
These types of punishments are called hudud. There are a few punishments,
however, that the Shari'ah considers to depend on the view of the Hakim [9],
who, by taking into consideration the causes and conditions of the crime
and any motivating factors or factors that make the crime more serious,
enforces a punishment in accordance. These punishments are called ta'zirat.
The crimes for which hudud have been stipulated are adultery,
homosexuality (including lesbianism), falsely accusing a person of committing
one of these crimes- drinking alcohol, stealing and armed civil disturbance,
which are all considered crimes against God. Although these have all been
greatly misunderstood both inside and outside the Islamic world, they are
detailed and here is not the place to discuss them more. It must be mentioned,
however, that if a certain punishment has not been introduced in the Shari'ah
amongst the hudud, the Islamic government must introduce punishments
according to what it considers to be in the best interests. These punishments
are amongst the t'azirat.
The Book of Retaliation (qisas)
Qisas is also a type of punishment, but for offences wherein
one person criminally ends the life or harms the body of another person.
In reality, qisas is the right Islam gives to the offended person
or to his heirs if the offense leads to the offended person's death.
Such offenses are either murder or loss or impediment of a part of the
body, and are either intentional (amd), similar to intentional (shabih
amd) or purely a mistake (khata mehd).
An intentional offense is that the offense was committed with the intention
to commit it, such as a person who intends to kill another person and attacks
him and kills him, whether or not the attack was made with a special weapon
of attack, like a sword or a gun, or whether made with something else,
such as a stone. If the serious intention of the murderer was to kill the
other, and this in fact he does, this is enough for it to be ruled as "intentional
".
An offense that is "similar to intentional" is that the intention is
to do the act but not to do the harm which the act causes. An example of
this is that a person with the intention of-hurting another person hits
him with a club, which results in the victim's death. Another example is
that someone hits a child in their way of teaching a lesson and the child
dies. Also in this status is the case of the doctor who treats his patient
for a certain disease and the treatment causes the patient to die.
Purely a mistake, however, is that there was no intention at all, such
as the killing of someone by a person who was only cleaning his rifle and
it accidentally fired a shot, or by a person who was only driving his car
quite normally in the street.
In the cases of intentional killing or similar to intentional killing
the heirs of the deceased have the right of qisas, meaning that
under the supervision of the Islamic government, and at the discretion
of the nearest of kin, the killer can either be executed or forced to pay
recompensetbut in the case of merely a mistake the killer is not to be
executed and is only obliged to pay the heirs the diyah, the financial
recompense.
The Book of Financial Recompense (diyah)
Diyah is like qisas in that it is a right of the offended
person or the heirs of the offended person upon the offender, with the
difference that qisas is a way of taking payment in kind while diyah
is a financial penalty. The laws of diyah like the laws of qisas,
are very detailed.
Under the books of qisas and diyah, the jurisprudents
have gone into the question of the liability of doctors and of teachers.
About doctors they say that if the doctor is not proficient and makes
a mistake in his treatment of the patient that leads to the patient's death,
he is liable. And, if he is proficient and he treats the patient without
the patient's permission or the permission of the patient's nearest of
kin, and the treatment leads to the patient's death, he is again liable.
If the doctor is proficient, however, and he treats the patient with the
permission of that patient, or of the patient's nearest of kin, he must
first make the condition to the patient or to the heirs that he will do
his utmost, but that, should his efforts happen to lead to the patient's
death, he is not responsible. In this case, supposing that the patient
dies or suffers some physical loss, the doctor is not liable and not subject
to qisas. If, however, he does not make this condition before beginning
the treatment, some of the jurisprudents say that he is liable.
Likewise, if a teacher unnecessarily hitting a child leads to the child's
death or damage to the child's body, the teacher is liable. If, however,
it is really in the child's best interest to be punished, and this should
happen to lead to the child's death or damage to the child's body, the
teacher must have taken permission to punish him from the child's guardians,
otherwise he is liable.
Translator's Epilogue
From the brief introduction to the issues of jurisprudence that has
been given here, it is to be seen how jurisprudence, like the Shari'ah
itself, enters into all the aspects of Islamic life, a necessity if life
is going to be Islamic.
One of the results of this has been that there has never been general
agreement as to how the different issues of jurisprudence (or, in other
words, the laws of Islam) should be classified, as to justly arrange and
classify the different aspects of life, even Islamic life, is very difficult.
After the success of the Islamic revolution in Iran, however, a new development
has taken place in this regard, which, although such classifications are
of minor importance, and although it is yet to be seen how this new cl-assification
can be adapted to the existing classifications, promises to revolutionise
the outward appearance of jurisprudence.
The new classification is wonderful in its simplicity. It divides all
the Islamic laws and legislations into four groups, under the headings
of "Worship and Self-Perfection", including the issues of cleanliness,
ritual prayer, fasting and the Hajj; "Economic Affairs", which includes
khoms, zakat, endowment, partnership, etc.; "Family Affairs",
including marriage, divorce, wills and inheritance; and "Political Affairs",
which includes arbitration, Islamic punishments, the jihad of defense and
so on.
As has been said, the sum of the Islamic teachings are basically divided
into three: knowledge of the unseen reality, knowledge of the perfection
of one's inner self, and knowledge of the perfection of one's external
actions. Perhaps the reason why of all three it is the least important
external actions that have been given such importance within the schools
is that they are less inherent than belief and virtue and are, therefore,
more demanding of the intellectual capacities, and are dependent upon the
other two. That is a person having some knowledge of God, Prophethood,
Imamate and the Hereafter, may become engaged solely in the struggle to
purify himself, attaching no more concern to his external actions than
ensuring that they accord to his moral values. A person who has a mastery
of the external laws of actions, however, cannot be without sure knowledge
of the realities and sublime moral excellence. To learn and act according
to the Shari'ah without certainty or at least profound and sincere belief,
without moral excellence and without a well trained intellect is almost
impossible . If one has scant knowledge of the realities, or has knowledge
of the realities but little virtue, one will never see the point of adhering
to the intricacies of living according to the Shari'ah.
Therefore, although the teaching of jurisprudence is the centre of all
the religious institutions, the two more urgent studies also have their
place. If the students of jurisprudence did not themselves develop their
knowledge of the realities and of self-perfection, there simply would not
be any students of jurisprudence; the laws of the Shari'ah would be forgotten
and many of the words and commands of God, the Prophet and Imams would
no longer be acted upon because they would no longer be understood.
Notes:
[1] faqihat is the feminine
plural of faqih, meaning, therefore, female jurisprudents.
[2] The other being Najaf, despite
the way it has been weakened and reduced by the Ba'ath regime of Iraq.
[3] A thimmi kafer is a kafer
(non-Muslim) who lives in peace in the Islamic state in accordance to the
laws and subject to the benefits it accords him, and no other kafer
is allowed to live in an Islamic state.
[4] ihram is a state which
one binds upon oneself wherein many things become forbidden for one. During
the Hajj and umrah it accompanies the wearing of two plain
white, unsewn pieces of cloth.
[5] Mehr is like a dowry in
reverse, i.e. it is the agreed sum to be paid by the man to the woman as
a condition of their marriage.
[6] A point about nathr which
the author has not mentioned is that it is often made as a promise to do
some good deed or deeds in return for a requested favour. In this case,
the nathr only becomes obligatory when God has granted that favour.
[7] Shrimps, however, are ruled as
sea-locusts, and are permissable to eat, provided, like fish, they are
taken from the water live.
[8] i.e. half a mithqal-an
eastern measurement.
[9] The Hakim Shari'ah is, as we
have seen, either a mujtahid meeting the conditions of being just, etc.
or his representative, who, in cases needing what in English is called
a magistrate, assumes this responsibility.
