In Shi'ism, the principle of justice is one of the
principles of religion. Justice in Islamic culture is divided into divine justice and
human justice. Divine justice is subdivided into creative justice and legislative justice.
Human justice is subdivided into individual justice and social justice. The concept of
justice considered unique to Shi'ism that has taken its place among the principles of
religion in Shi'ism is divine justice. This type of justice specifically arises in the
context of the Islamic worldview.
To believe in divine justice means to believe that God acts in
accordance with truth and justice, both in the system of the creation and in the system of
legislation, and never shows injustice. Justice has become one of the principles of
Shi'ism because some who denied human choice and freedom appeared among the Muslims. They
arrived at a belief regarding divine decree and foreordination that was wholly
inconsistent with human freedom. They denied the principle of cause and effect in the
overall system of the universe and in the system of human conduct. They came to believe
that divine decree acts directly and without intermediation. According to this belief,
fire does not cause to burn, but God causes to burn; a magnetic field in no way attracts
iron, but God directly draws the iron to the lines of the magnetic field; man does not the
good or evil deed, but God directly carries out the good or evil deed through the human
form.
Here a major question arose. If the system of cause and effect has no
reality, and if man himself has no real role in choosing his actions, then what function
is served by rewarding or punishing the individual for his acts? "Why does God mete
out rewards to some people and take them to paradise and punish others and take them to
hell when He Himself has carried out both the good deed and the evil one? To punish human
individuals when they have not p05sessed the least choice and freedom of their own is
injustice and contrary to the categorical principle of divine justice.
The Shi'a at large and a party among the Sunnis called the
Mu'tazilites, relying on decisive rational and transmitted proofs, denied that man is
determined and that divine decree and fore-ordination act directly on the universe; they
regarded these ideas as immical to the principle of justice and so became known as the
People of Justice (adliyya). Although justice is a divine principle (that is,
linked with one of the attributes of God), it is likewise a human principle because it is
linked with human freedom and choice. Therefore, among the Shi'a and the Mu'tazilites,
belief in the principle of justice means belief in the principle of human freedom, human
responsibility, and human creativity.
The question concerning divine justice that generally- especially in
our own time-draws the most attention has to do with certain social inequalities: How is
it that some individuals are beautiful and others ugly, some healthy and others sickly,
some comfortable and affluent and others empty-handed and indigent? Would divine justice
not require all individuals to be equal with respect to wealth, lifespan, offspring,
social position, reputation, and receipt of love? Can anything but divine decree and
foreordination be responsible for these inequalities?
The roots of this question and the confusion underlying it are two. One
is inattention to the nature of the operation of divine decree and foreordination. The
questioner has imagined that they work directly. For instance, wealth would be
directly and without the intervention of any cause or agency transported from the divine
treasuries of the unseen and parcelled out at people's doors, and the same would hold for
health, beauty, power, position, love, offspring, and other blessings.
The questioner has failed to note that no sort of sustenance, whether
material or spiritual, is apportioned directly from the treasury of the unseen. Rather,
divine decree has produced a system and originated a series of norms and laws. 'Whatever
anyone seeks, he must seek through that system and those norms. The second root of this
error is inattention to the station and situation of man as a being who seeks to better
his own life, to struggle with the factors in nature on the one hand and to struggle with
the evil factors in society and the misdeeds and oppression of human individuals on the
other-who has these as his responsibilities. If there are certain inequalities in society,
if some are rich and have wealth by the shiploads at their disposal, while others are
destitute and in despair on oceans of affliction, the divine decree is not responsible.
Man, free, empowered, and responsible, bears the blame for these inequalities.