[1] By Dar Ahl al-Bayt, Matabi` al-Dajawi,
Abidin.
[2] Al-Tashayyu
zahirah tabi'iyyah fi itar al-da'wah al-islamiyyah
[3] Bahth
hawl al-walayah.
[4] See Dr. Kamil Mustafa al-Shaybi, al-Silah bayna al-tasawwuf wal-tashajyu; I:11-14, where he presents the
views of many ancient and contemporary investigators into the origin and
evolution of Shi'ism. He also states that some of them differentiate between
political and spiritual (i.e. doctrinal) Shi`ism. See Dr. Mustafa al-Shak`ah,
Islam bila madhahib, p. 153; and
Dr. Diya' al-Din al-Rayyis, al-Nazariyyat
al-siyasiyyah al islamiyyah,
p. 69.
[5] See Dr. Mahmud Jabir `Abd al-`Al, Harakat al-Shi`ah al-mutatarrafin
ma atharuhum fi al-hayat al-ijtimiyyah, p. 19. This claim is ascribed to
some Muslim historians. However, al-`Al points out that this was rejected
by Bernard Lewis, the well-known Orientalist. Wellhausen and Friedlander,
two of the biggest scholars in the field, are quoted as saying, "Ibn Saba'
was fabricated by those who came later in time." Dr. Taha Husayn, in his al-Fitnah al-kubra, II:327, says: "The Shiites' opponents exaggerated the issue of Ibn
Saba' in order to defame Ali and his followers." He added that `We find no
mention of Ibn Saba' in any of the important sources ...He is not mentioned in
Baladhuris Ansab al-ashraf, but
is in Tabari's Tarikh, as reported by
Sayf b. `Umar al-Tamimi About this Sayf, though, Ibn Hayyan said that
"He related forgeries and was said to fabricate hadiths himself." Al-Hakim stated that he was accused of
heresy, and that his hadiths were omitted. See Ibn Hajar, Tadhhib al-tadhbib IV:260. Concerning the legend of `Abd Allah b. Saba, see `Allamah
Murtadha al`Askari's book, `Abd Allah b.
Saba'.
[6] See al-Shaybi al-Silah
bayna al-tasawwuf wal-tashayyu; Dr. `Abd Allah Fayyad, Ta'rikh al-Imamiyyah wa aslafihim min
al-Shi'ah; Dr. Mustafa al-Shakah, Islam bila madhahib, p.
152ff; Dr. Diya' al-Din
al-Rayyis, al Nazarijyat al-siyasiyyah
al-islamiyyah, p. 72ff.
[7] Indeed, it is consistent neither with ordinary logic nor
with the logic of the Holy Qur'an. In numerous places, the Qur'an mostly, if
not always, censures the majority, and praises the few in as many places. For
instance, God says: "And yet most are not wont to be thankful..."
(Qur'an 27:73 "al-Naml"). God also says: "... but a few of
my servants are grateful" (34:13 "al-Saba"); "...and many people are
sinful" (5:52 "al Maidah")...Those
are they who are brought near in the Gardens of Delight, a party from those of
old and a few from those who have come later" (56:11-4 "al-waqiah"). This is one aspect. The other is that
the Holy Qur'an informs us in many places that those who adhere to Truth and to
God's Messengers, and are directed by Divine teachings, are always fewer in
comparison to those who headstrongly resist the truth. God says: "Most of
them dislike the truth..." (23:70 "al-Mu'minun"); "Yet no faith will the greater
part of mankind have, however ardently thou dost desire it" (12:103 "Yusuf"). In every case, there is allusion to the
invalidity of relying on the standards of the majority in order to evaluate the
correctness of a trend or an opinion. See Muhammad Fuad `Abd al-Baqi, al-Mujam
al-mufahris li-alfaz al-Qur'an, p. 597ff.
[8] It appears that the Imam is proffering this by way of
humbleness and tolerance; otherwise there are prophetic hadiths which utter the word "Shi'ism" in connection with
`Ali. It is said in Ibn Manzur's Mukhtasar
Tar'ikh Ibn Asaki'r (XVII:384) that `Ali uttered: "The Prophet
told me [May God bless him and his Household [you and your followers [shiatuka] are in the Garden of Paradise." But there is another account
by Jabir (XVIII:14). Cf. Ibn al-Athir, al-Nihayah IV:106 ("Madat
qamh"): "You and your followers [shiatuka] will be pleased and pleasing..." - addressed to `Ali.
[9] These two terms, "Call" and
"Mission" of Islam, are used interchangeably in this translation -
Translator.
[10] The Qur'an affirms that "He is the one who sends
down to His servants the clear signs, that He may bring ye out of the veils of
darkness and unto the Light" (57:9
"alHad").
[11] This was done at the formal address of the Farewell
Pilgrimage, where he declared: "I am about to be summoned forth, and am
about to reply." And in another account: "It is as if I am being
summoned forth and am answering. Verily, I leave thee two weighty things..."
(Sahih Muslim, IV4:1874). `Abd Allah b. Mas`ud, is reported as saying, `We were with the
Prophet [May God Bless him and his household] one night, when he sighed. So, I
asked him, `What ails you, O Messenger of God?' He said: `My death has been
announced to me"' (Mukhtasar
Ta'r'ikh Ibn Asakir XVIII:32).
[12] That is, if we suppose the Prophet to have been so keen
to have his blessed calling go the full length set for it - as indeed it
was his nature to be - and to have striven to take it to the rest of the
world, it could only be that he took it upon himself to reckon the future.
[13] That is, of a successor - Translator.
[14] The titles given to the three discussions in both the
first and the second chapters were construed from Imam Sadr's own statements,
but are not part of the original text.
[15] It is well recognized that a head of state's empty seat
engendered countless perils and dangers, particularly in the absence of clearly
stipulated constitutional provisions for quickly filling the vacancy. See Dr.
al-Rayyis, al Nazarijyat al-siyasiyyah
al-islamiyyah, p. 134.
[16] See al-Shahrastani, al-Milal wal-nihal I:15, where he states:
`Umar b. al-Khattab: 'Whosever says that Muhammad has died I shall slay
with this mine own sword. He has ascended to Heaven."' Cf. Muhammad b.
Jarir al-Tabari, Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:233: "He said that Muhammad indeed
did not die and that he would go over to the one spread rumour of his death and
cut off his hands and smite him at the neck..."
[17] On this state
of affairs, there is no lack of evidence. For example, al-Bukhari, Muslim
and al-Tirmidhi (in Kitab al-tafsir) recount, on the authority of Jabir
b.`Abdullah: "We were on an expedition, when a Muhajir struck someone from the Ansar.
The Ansari called out, `O Ansar [help me]!' while the Muhajirun called out, `O Muhajirin [help me]!' The Prophet heard
all this and said `What pagan cry is this?' Ibn Sallul was also heard saying.
`They have done it. By God if we return to Medina the stronger will drive out
the weaker"' (al-Shaykh al-Nasif, al Tajj -al jami li1-usul 1V:263).
[18] During the Prophet's lifetime, the
"Hypocrites" as a group sought to play a menacing role through plots
against Islam, the Messenger of God himself and the Muslims. See the previous
note, for instance, for the statement by Ibn Sallul, who headed the
"Hypocrites." They happened to stir up all manner of falsehoods and
to disseminate disruptive rumours, as in the Battles of Uhud and Ahzab.
Consequently, God revealed the "Surah
of the Hypocrites" in the Qur'an, in which He exposed this malicious
group, informing His Messenger of their designs and whatever they sought to
hide. See, for example, al-Fakhr al-Razi's Tafsi'r First ed.VIII:157 (Cairo: al Khayriyyah,1308 AH); al-Zamakhshari
al-Kahshaf IV:811
[19] In relation to those who embraced Islam after Mecca was
gained over, a large number would be expected to commit religious apostasy.
Jabir b. `Abd Allah al-Ansari relates: "I heard the Messenger
of God say: `People have entered in throngs and they shall leave in
throngs..."' Note also that the movement of apostasy occurred after the
passing away of the Prophet, despite his many warnings about such a, prospect (al Kashshaf IV:811; Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:245). See the famous hadith of
the Basin, where the Prophet says: "I will be there at the Basin before
you. And men known to me shall come forth, to whom I shall be denied access. I
call out to them, "My Companions!" They will answer, `Little do you
know what they have concocted after you!' I reply, "Away with all those
who changed after me!" (Sahih al-Bukhari) VIII:86 ("Kitab al fitan").
[20] Ibid.
[21] Regarding the story of Abu Bakr's appointment of `Umar
b. al-Khattab as his successor, there are the following words uttered by
Abu Bakr: "If you have accepted my command while I live, it would be
unbecoming that you should differ after me..." (Mukhtasar Ta'rikh Ibn Asakir XVIII:308-09); Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:245, 280.
[22] Ta'rikh
al-Tabari II:580 - Imam. Ibn Manzur, Mukhtasar Tarikh Ibn Asakir XVIII:312.
[23] Tarikh al-Tabari
II:581 - Imam
[24] Tarikh
al-Tabari, ed Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim II:205; ibid, II:581.
[25] Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-balaghah, ed. Abu al-Fadl Ibrahirn II:42 -
Imam. Tarikh al-Tabari II:353. Abu Bakr said: "Would that I had not accepted it..."
[26] `Umar wished the deliberations would have ended and a
Caliph selected before his wounding, so that he might die a tranquil death
knowing that Islam would progress after him..." (Dr. Muhammad Husayn
Haykal, al-Faruq `Umar II:313-314).
[27] The Prophet Muhammad, during his blessed calling,
earnestly desired for the unity of the Ummah and the progress of Islam, no doubtless more intensely than any of
his Companions. For God has declared: "...a beloved friend taking to heart
that ye should suffer adversity, ardently concerned for you, and to the,
faithful most kind, compassionate" (Qur'aan, 9:128 "al-Tawbah").
What is important is that his concern for the Ummah, his teaching of the Companions the
necessary avoidance of discord, and his practical experience in this hardly
need proof, especially as the Qur'an is replete with tens of ayat calling for
the repudiation of all dissension, its causes and motives. How can one then
imagine that this compassionate Prophet could have passed over the chief cause
of strife (namely, the question of leadership) without setting up what is
likely to obstruct and to bar its baleful effects; the more so that this same
perception impelled the first and second Caliphs themselves to appoint
successors, as is clear. Cf. Tarikh al-Tabari
II:580.
[28] Ibid.
[29] Ibn al-Athir, Ta'rikh
al-Kamil II:318 - Imam. See also Ibn Sad, al-Tabaqat al kubra II:249.
[30] Literally, a "shoulder blade," on which
important documents used to be written. It must be recalled that this was the
period just before the Muslims had introduced a new paper substance as a mass
commodity, for the first time in history - Translator.
[31] Sahih
al-Bukhari I:37; Kitab al-`ilm 8:161; Kitab al-i'tisam. See also Sahih Muslim V:76 (Ch. "al-Wasiyyah")
(Cairo: Matba`at Muhammad 'Ali Sabih); Musnad
al-Imam Ahmad I:355; cf Ibn
Sa'd, al-Tabaqat al-kubra II:242-44 - Imam.
[32] Every Muslim believes in the preeminence of the
Messenger's personality as a leader, let alone as a Prophet-Messenger,
which discounts unconditionally the presupposition stated above. Indeed, the
Muslim usually holds such a presupposition to be illegitimate with respect to
the Prophet for at least two reasons. One, it would be contrary to the
Prophet's familiar life-conduct unanimously acknowledged by the entire
community. His noble life abounds with goodly works and continuous struggle for
change, construction and salvation of the Ummah. Second, the presupposition runs contrary both to those hadiths which have numerous,
uninterrupted lines of transmission and to what he taught the Ummah with respect to diligence -
indeed, to the point of declaring: "Whosever wakes without a care for the
affairs of the Muslims is not one of them" (Usul al-kafi II:131). His disinterest
in the fate of the Call and of the Ummah would have actually make him derelict in his obligations and
trustworthiness.
[33] Dr. `Abd al-`Aziz al-Duri, al Nuzum al-islamiyyah (Baghdad:
Matba'at Najib, 1950), p. 7; Dr. Subhi al-Salih, al Nuzum al-islamiyyah (Dar al--`Ilm lil-Malayin,1965),
p. 50.
[34] In his book al-Nazariyyat
al-siyasiyyah al-islamiyyah, Dr. Dia' al-Din al-Rayyis has
acknowledged that the Caliphate in that form upon which rests the consultative
order has no basis in the hadiths. Rather,
it was based on a consensus among the Prophet's Companions, or Sahabah, on the grounds that it was
predominant (p. 106, in a note in response to Arnold). This becomes clearer
upon his response to and debate with Dr. 'Ali `Abd al-Razzaq, in al-Islam wa usul al-hukm, as the latter
denies the existence of any contemporaneous legal text which could have
benefited the system of politics and government. However, Dr. al-Rayyis
answers by arguing on the basis of the actual practice of the Righteous Caliphs
(al-khulafa al-rashidin). Their deeds are of decisive legal
value in Islam (p. 148-45). See the reliable and exhaustive discussion on
the text that is alleged to deal with "consultation" in `Allamah al-Sayyid
Kazim al-Ha'iri, Asas al-hukumah al-islamiyyah (Beirut: Matba`at al-Nil, 1399 AH), p. 81 ff.
[35] That is, leadership of the Imam.
[36] Imam 'Ali disavowed the idea of consultation and the
recourse to it by those who attended the Conference of Saqifah, where Abu Bakr
had used the pretext of his closeness to the Prophet. See the
"Shaqshaqiyyah Address" and, in particular, `Ali words, "What a
consultation!..." (Nahj al-Balaghah.
Sharh al-Imam Muhammad Abduh I:30, 34).
[37] Note the discussions and arguments that took place on
the Day of Saqiqah, as there was no mention, either explicit or implicit, of
"consultation." What did arise was quite different, including the
thesis of "One Amir from us, one from you." Abu Bakr, and after him
`Umar b. al-Khattab, rejected this idea, which the latter hastened to lay
to rest by taking Abu Bakr's hand and saying: "Open thy hand that I may
swear thee in..." For texts relating to the Saqfah, see Tarikh al-Tabari (Dar al-Turath)
II:234ff, esp. p. 203; also Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Sharh al-Nahj, ed. Abu al-Fadl
Ibrahim VI:6-9.
[38] Ibn Manzur, Mukhtasar
Tarikh Damashq XV III:310; Tarikh al-Tabari' II:352.
[39] Ta'rirkh
al-Yaqubi II:126 (Tab'at al-Najaf al-Haydariyyah)
-Imam. Cf. Mukhtasar Tarikh Ibn
`Asakir XVIII:310; Tarikh al-Tabari, First Edition IV:52 (al-Husayniyyah al-Misriyyah).
[40] In Mukhtasar
Tarikh Ibn Asakir XVIII:312, Qays b. Ab1 Hazim is recorded as
saying: "Umar left us, document in hand and accompanied by Shadid, his
protege, saying. "O People, hearken to the words of the Successor of God's
Messenger, I wish for you `Umar, so accept his oath." In another version:
"Hearken and obey what is contained in this paper."
[41] Umar said to Suhayb: "Lead the prayers for three
days. Then admit Ali, `Uthman, al-Zubayr, Sa`d, `Abd al-Rahman b.
`Awf and Talhah, if he comes forward. Have `Abd Allah b. `Umar attend, even
though the matter concerns him little. And observe them: if five of them are in
unison over one man and a sixth declines, extirpate the latter or strike off
his head with your sword., If only four agree on someone from their midst and
two decline, then strike both their heads; if three accept one man and three
another, then let `Abd Allah b. `Umar adjudicate in favour of one side, from
which he is to select one man. Should they disagree with `Abd Allah b. `Umar's
judgment, take then `Abd al-Rahman b. `Awf's side and slay the rest if
they are loathe to accept what people have agreed on..." Cf Tarikh al-Tabari II:581; Ibn Athir, al-Kamil
fi al-ta'rikh III:67 (Tabat Dar Sadir). This text has no commentary.
[42] Tabaqat
b. Sa`d III:343 (Beirut: Tab°at Dar Sadir) -
Imam. Cf. Tarikh alTabari II:580 (Dar al-`Ilmiyyah). The report here differs from Ibn Sa`d's.
[43] Ta'rikh
al-Tabari Third Edition II:354 (Beirut: Tab`at Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah,
1408 AH) - Imam.
[44] Ibid
II:242.
[45] Ibid. II:235
[46] 'Ibid
II:242. Imam 'Ali responded by arguing something similar to the
following, found in Mukhtasar Ta'rikh Ibn
Sad XVIII 38-9.
If the pursuit of Islam and faith alone could qualify a
human being for the Caliphate, besides a necessary propinquity with the
Prophet, or that he is friend and kin, then `Ali has gone the farthest in the
worship of God and faith in the Prophet's Message. Indeed, his worship of God
was not preceded by idolatry - he has never prostrated himself before
idols - unlike all the others. As for his proximity to the Messenger, he
was his closest kin. Strictly speaking, he was his heir [wali], brother and vicar -
the only person to lead in his stead. (Cf. Musnad
al-Imam Ahmad IV:281)
According to this reasoning, he is the most rightful person
to succeed, no other.
[47] Tarikh
al-Tabari II:241 ff, for events in 11 AH.
[48] Ibid
II:243; Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Sharh
Nahj al-Balaghah VI:6-9 - Imam.
[49] Ta'rikh
al-Tabari II:354.
[50] This is because, going by the present hypothesis, if
attention had been drawn to such a system, as would invariably be required,
then we would have come across a specific concept in texts pertaining to this
generation, or some specific application. However, nothing of the sort has been
detected, as the Imam Baqir al-Sadr rightly pointed out.
[51] Because instruction normally occurs in his noble
biography and blessed tradition, but bearing on issues of a lesser nature and
importance than this question; it takes place in myriad contexts or situations.
[52] The abiding truth is that all details pertaining to the
idea of consultation have vanished even at a level which might have defined its
most basic features as a system of rule, as it has not been related that any of
the contenders, whether at the conference of Saqifah or afterwards, had come
forward with or clung to a single text in any degree. For the Saqifah texts,
see Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:234ff.
[53] That a system of governance in the Arabian Peninsula
did not exist, before the advent of prophethood and the founding of the Islamic
State at Medina, is something that historians accept, on the one hand, in view
of the undoubted absence of a genuine state; and, on the other, to the Arabs'
diffidence to tribal customs and traditions. Cf. Dr. Salih Ahmad al Ali, Muhadarat
fi ta'rikh al-Arab, Second
Edition (Baghdad); Dr.`Abd al-Latif al-Taybawi; Muhadarat fi-ta'rikh al-Arab al-Islam
I:121 (Beirut: Dar al Andalus, 1963); Dr. Jawad `Ali; Ta'rikh al-`Arab qabl al-Islam.
Al Qism al siyasi (Tab`at Dar al-Majma` al Ilmi al-`Iraqi);
Dr. Hasan Ibrahim Hasan, Ta'rikh al-Islam
al-siyasi, p. 51.
[54] This is in respect of the need for sufficient
clarification to help settle the issue of leadership, now left vacant; thus
averting the dreaded dangers that accompany the absence of precise standards in
this connection.
[55] That is, as is the case with every legal
responsibility, for this will be elaborated on. This was exactly what the
Prophet was wont to hold regarding all legal responsibilities. God says:
"We brought down a remembrance that ye may clarify to the people what has
come down to them" (Qur'an 16:44 "al-Nahl") If
it were legally-sanctioned rule, a duty that had to to be performed by
those qualified, it would have required clarification.
[56] That is, as came to pass in the attempt to expunge the
principle of walayah (or "guardianship") in `Ali's case. Despite
this, the relevant texts have not all disappeared Many texts have come down
through recurrent and uninterrupted transmission. Cf. Ibn Manzur, Mukhtasar Ta'rikh Ibn Asakir, XVII:356ff, XVIII:1-50.
If there were any texts or statements on consultation as a system, they have
passed into oblivion.
[57] See the appended study. Cf. Ibn Manzur, Mukhtasar Ta'rikh Ibn Asakir XVII:354, XVIII:I-50; Abu Na'im, Hilyat al-awliya' I:66; Ibn Sa'd, al-Tabaqat al-kubra II:338; al-Qanduzi,
Yanabi al-mawaddah I:62ff; al-Nassa'i, al-Sunan
al-kubra and al Khasais V:128ff.
[58] It is noteworthy that the Muslim writers investigating
the question of political order or the Caliphate, who dismiss the whole idea of
stipulation and designation (illustrated by hundreds of Prophetic traditions),
relying instead on the notion of a consultative system and using the Qur'an
among other sources, have not come across any Prophetic texts in support of
their claims. As a result, they are compelled to rely on the biographies of the
Companions. And yet, they have not been able to give a logical interpretation
for the Companions' rather confused and incongruous situation in the midst of
which a successor was appointed. Cf Dr. al-Rayyis, al-Nazariyyat al siyasiyah al-islamiyyah; `Abd al-Fattah
`Abd al -Maqsud, al-Saqifah
mal-khilafah.
[59] Cf. Ibn Manzur, Mukhtasar
Ta'rikh Ibn Asakir XVIII:230, on the story concerning al-Sha'bi,
who was with Talhah, al-Zubayr, Said and `Abd al-Rahman.
[60] Ta'rikh
al-Tabari, First Edition II:92 (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al--`Ilmiyyah).
This relates to the Prophetic hadith at
the time when a trench was being dug.
[61] Cf.
Sunan Abi Daud, on account of its specialty in hadiths on legal rulings; Imam Malik's al-Muwatta ; with a total of 1570 hadiths, some of which are mursal.
[62] The four volumes of Ibn Hajar's al-Isabah fi tamyiz al-sahabah count up to 12,267. See Dr. Akram
Diya' al-`Umar's Buhuth fi ta'rikh
al-sunnah al-musharaffah, Third edition (Beirut. Mu'assasat al-Risalah,1975)
(the note on p. 71). Cf. Dr. Subhi al-Salih,
Ulum al-hadith wa
mustalahahu, p. 354. It is related on Abu Zar'ah that the Prophet left
behind 114,000 Companions.
[63] Dr. Subhi al-Salih, Nahj al-balaghah, Imam `Alis's Sermon No. 210, p. 327. He
said: "Not all of the Messenger's Companions used to question or query
him, so much so that they preferred that a Bedouin or a complete stranger to
ask and they listen. But none of it would go past me without my asking and
retaining..."
[64] Sunan
al-Darimi I:50 (Nashr Dar Ihya' al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah).
[65] Ibid
I:50 - Imam.
[66] Ibid. I:50 - Imam.
[67] Ibid
1:50 - Imam.
[68] Qur'-an 70:27-31, `"Abasa'.
[69] Al-Suyuti, al-Itiqan
fi Ulum Qur'an II:4, ed.
Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim.
[70] Shafi`ite legal interpretation (ijtihad) dismisses the
two theories of "legal or juridical discretion" (istihsan) and
"unbounded interests" (al-masalih
al-mursalah), as religious
law (al-shariah) takes it upon itself to clarify every
legal ruling needed by man, whether through explicit text, allusively or
legally-sanctioned analogy, This is because legal discretion has no
regulative mechanism or scale by which one can weigh the true against the
false. It is reported that Shafi'i had said, "To use legal discretion is
to legislate." See al-Madkhal
al fiqhi al-amm by Dr. Mustafa al-Zarqa I:124-25.
[71] On the question
of the writing of the hadiths, their
prohibition and subsequent endorsement, what was found and recorded by Dr.
Subhi al-Salih, 'Ulum al-hadith
wa mustalihihi (Tab'at Dar al-`Ilm lil-Malayin), p. 20ff (in
the notes).
[72] Ibid.. See also Sunan
al-Darimi I:119 (Ch. "Who ought to disregard the
written hadihs?" ["man lam
yara kitabat al-hadith"]).
[73] Ibn Sa'd, al-Tabaqat
al-kubra III:287 (Tab`at Dar Bayrut,1405 AH).
[74] The first official collection of traditions was written
by Muhammad b. Muslim b. Shahab al-Zuhri (dd.124 Al-1), as ordered
by `Umar b. `Abd al--`Aziz. He is said to have affirmed: "This
knowledge has never been put into a collection before." Cf. Dr. Subhi al-Salih,
Ulum al-hadith wa mustalihatuhu, p. 46.
[75] Usul
al-Kafi I:241-42 (Ch. "Dhikr al-sahifah wal jafr wal jami`ah") (Tehran: Nashr Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah,
1388 AH).
[76] As in Hadith al-thaqlayn
("Two Weights': "Verily, I have left among you that by which,
if you adhere to it, you shall never go astray after I am gone...," whose
reliability has been indicated above; see, for example, Sahih Muslim
IV:1874; cf. Muhammad Taqi al-Hakim, al- Usul al-Ammah, his study
on the Sunnah.
[77] In n. 17 above, we alluded to issues concerning the
confused matter of consultation, differences over its proper criteria and features
from one Caliph to the other. Cf. `Abd al-Fattah Abd al-Maqsud, al-Saqifah wal-khilafah, p. 264.
[78] Cf Shaykh al-Mufid, al-Irshad, p. 22; al-Qanduzi, Yanabi al-mawaddah I:62. See also this book's appendix,
"The Intellectual and Moral Upbringing of lmam `Ali..."
[79] Ibn al-`Arabi, Ahkam al-Qur'an IV:1778
("al-Hashr"); cf, al-Baladhuri, Futuh al buldan, p. 268.
[80] On the prophecy
of their conquest, see Tarik al-Tabari II:92
(Beirut: Dar al Kutub al ilmiyyah).
[81] `Umdat
al-qari; Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari VIII:137, Ch. "Takbir `ala al janazah" (Beirut:
Dar Ihya' al-Turath) - Imam.
[82] Dr. Mustafah `Abd al-Razzaq, Tamhid li-Ta'rikh al falsafah, p. 272.
[83] The Imam splendidly draws attention to the precise
criteria for the task of teaching and its final product. These criteria and
observations are relevant to any effort at intellectual or moral training -
and, likewise, to the effort to give a substantial appraisal of a similar case.
[84] On what made Arabian and Hijazi society what it is
before Islam, see Dr. Jawad `Ali, Tarikh al-`arab qabl Islam
(Sections on "religion" and "society'.)
[85] Indeed, the variety of responsibilities and their
natures, the challenges encountered by the Prophet as leader were so serious
that the he could not find sufficient time to complete his education and
instruction of wide sectors of the Islamic community. Cf. Muhammad Baqir al-Hakim,
Ulum al-Qur'an, pp. 96-100.
[86] In its wider sense, the expression "People of the
Book" refers to Jews, Christians and Muslims, but often refers to the
former two when interreligious relations are the subject - Translator.
[87] In reference to legends about people or events of the
Israelite period -Translator.
[88] Cf. Muhammad Husayn al-Dhahabi, al-Isra'ilayat
fi tafsir wal-hadith (Damascus: Dar al-Iman, 1985).
[89] Cf "Surat al-Munafiqun" of the
Quran. One might note here the actions and movements of the Jews, the roles
they played in Islamic history; cf. Muhammad Jawad Mughniyyah, al-Isra'iliyyat
fi al-Qur'an (Beirut).
[90] That is, the following chapter entitled "The Third
Path."
[91] Al-Zamakhshari, Tafsir al-Kashshaf IV: 810 ("Tafsir Surat al-Nasr").
[92] As God says in the Quran: "Alms are for the poor
and the humble, those who administer it and for those whose hearts have been
reconciled, for those in bondage, in debt and in the way of God; and for the
wayfarer: Thus is it ordained by God..." (Quran 9:60 "Surat al-Tawbah")
[93] They appear to be numerous so as to constitute a burden
upon the State's financial reserves, whose concellation the second Caliph had
defended on the argument that Islam had become mighty and powerful.
[94] This is readily available in most interpretations of Surat al-Munafiqin.
[95] As the Prophet said, "God hath commanded me to
love four [persons], telling me of His Love of them: `Ali, Abu Dharr, al-Miqdad
and Salman" (Sunan Ibn Majjah, I:66). Cf. al-Tajj al jai lil-usul III:405.
[96] Among circles of theorists and thinkers, a common
statement is that theory is enriched through application. That is why the Imam
points out that Islam is not of this sort.
[97] Cf "Nothing have we ommitted from the
Book..." (Qur'an 6:38 "Surat al An'am"...and we sent down
to thee the Book explaining all things..." (Qur'an 16:89 "Surat al
Nahl") ...so take what the Messenger assigns to you, and deny yourselves..."
(Quran 59:7
"Sural al-Hashr")
[98] See our study appended at the end of this book.
[99] We have not sent thee but [as a Messenger] to all
men..." (Quran 34:28, "Surat Saba") We have not sent
thee but as Mercy for all..." (Qur'an 21:107, "Surat al Anbiya")
[100] The Prophet Muhammad wanted to spare his Ummah
the bitterness and pains that go with trial and error, along with the suffering
and calamity this may bring upon it He said: "Come! Let me write you a
letter that you may never go astray after I am gone..." Yet the greatest
loss - as expressed by Ibn 'Abbas - was that the Messenger was
prevented from doing so. See the story in Sahih
al-Bukhari VIII:161 (Ch.
"al I'tisam").
[101] Note the cases of defection and apostasy after the
Prophet had died, all the plain inconsistencies and departures from Islam's
clarities and morality committed even by some high-ranking military
chiefs - as in the case of Khalid b. al-Walid who, in the story of
Malik b. Nuwayrah, was accused by the second Caliph `Umar of "killing a
Muslim [i.e. Malik b. Nuwayrah] and then coveting his wife." Cf. Tarikh al-Tabari II:280 (Beirut:
Dar al-Turath), the edited printing.
[102] That was the logic of previous missions, as in Da'ud's
(David's) succession by Sulayman (Solomon); similar Musas (Moses succession by
Harun (Aaron): "He said, Be heir of my people and be just..."
Finally, this is necessitated by the logic of things and that of the final
Religious Law (al-Shariah). Cf Appendix.
[103] He means to allude to those who embraced Islam at the
time of the taking of Mecca. Among "those whose hearts were brought
together" was Abu Sufyan and Mu awiyah, Tarikh al-Tabari II:175.
[104] Cf. Ibn Khaldun, al-Muqaddamah
(Tab`at Dar al Jil), p. 227 ("The Transformation of the Caliphate into
a Monarchy" Ibn Athir III:199 (Tab`at al Halabli) relates that `Abd al-Rahman
b. Abi Bakr interrupted Marwan, as the latter was giving sermon from the minbar of Medina, in order to defend
Mu`awiyah's point of view, shouting at him, "By God! you lie as much as
Mu'awiyah. Neither of you intends anything good for the Ummah. You want to make it Heraclean;
whenever an Heraclius dies another rises in his place." Cf. al-Suyuti,
Tarikh al-khulafa p.
203.
[105] Ibn Athir III:487 relates that Hasan al-Basri,
one of the most prominent of those who succeeded the Companions, had stated,
"Murawiyah has four traits; if he had but one trait, it would be
violation. His leaping upon this Ummah sword in hand to seize power, without any deliberation, while
there were Companions of virtue; bequeathing the throne to his drunkard son
Yazid; making his claims on Ziyad; killing Hajar b. `Adi and his confidants.
Woe upon him for Hajar! Woe upon him for Hajar and his confidants!..."
[106] Cf. al-Tajj al jami lil usul V:310; for further
details, see Sayyid Qutb's al-Adalah
al-ijtimaiyyah fi al-Islam, p. 231 ff
[107] See what al-Suyuti relates in his Tarikh, p. 209ff, regarding "What abominable
transgressions were perpetrated by Yazid against the Prophet's grandson,
Husayn; the confinement of the rest of the family; the assault on Mecca,
seizure of Medina, killing of its inhabitants and outrages against loved
ones!"
[108] He means Abu Sufyan's statement to `Uthman upon
acceding to power. Cf. al Suyuti, Tarikh al-khulafa; p. 209; al-Maqrizi, al-Naza`
wal-takhasum bayna Bani Hashim wa Bani Umayyah, ed. Dr. Mu'nis, p.
56.
[109] No doubt, after excluding the two previous
suppositions, only this one remains logically acceptable.
[110] See our explanation in the Appendix about this
selection and the whole (intellectual, practical and moral) enterprise of
apostolic training.
[111] Because, as the texts make explicit, the training of
the Caliph who happens to lead would be complete and the person actually
designated.
[112] Cf the texts copied in our Appendix concerning our
Sunni brethren.
[113] See Imam `Ali's address known as "al-Qas'iah," as mentioned in the Appendix. Cf. Nahj al-balaghah pp.
300-01, edited by Dr.
Subhi a1-Salih.
[114] It is held that Imam `All had said, "Whenever I
questioned him - that is, the Prophet - he would oblige. But when I
remained silent, he anticipated me..." (al Nassa'i, al-Sunan al-kubra V:142; al-Sawa`iq al-muharraqah),
p. 127.
[115] Al-Hakim al-Nisaburi, al-Mustadrak ala al-sahihayn,
III:136, hadith No. 4633 (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al
Ilmiyyah).
[116] Abi Na`im, Hilyat
al-awliya' I:68 (Beirut: Dar al-Kitab al-`Arabi,
1407 AH).
[117] Al-Sunan al-kubra,
"al-Khasais" V:140,
bath No. I/8499.
[118] Ibid.
V:141. [119] Ibid. V:142.
[120] Al-Mustadrak III:135, hadith No. 4630, ed. Mustafa `Abd al-Qadir `Ata'
(Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah, 1411 AH).
[121] Al-Nasaa'i, al-Sunan
al-kubra V:154, Ch.
54. Cf the story in Mukhtasar Ta'rikh
Ibn 'Asakir XVIII:21.
[122] Nahj
al-balaghah, ed. Dr. Subhi al-Salih, Sermon No. 192.
[123] See Appendix; cf.
al-Suyuti, Tarikh al-khulafa ; pp. 180-82. As `Umar b. alKhattab said, "God
forbid that there be as problem and no Abu al-Hasan to solve it."
Ibn Hajar, al-Sawaiq al-muhriqah, p. 127.
[124] Hadith
al-Dar upon the revelation of these words of the Qur'an:
"Warn thy closest kinsfolk" (Qur'an 26:214, "Surat al-'Ushara").
Cf. Tafsir a1-Kabir III:371 (Beirut: Dar al-Ma'rifah).
[125] Hadith
al-thaqlayn is provided
by the compilers of sihah, sunan and
masanid. Cf. Sahih Muslim IV: 1873; Sahih al-Tirmidhi V:596, edited by Kamal al-Hut (Dar
al-Fikr).
[126] Hadith
al-Manzilah: "You have the position with respect to me that
Harun had with Musa..." (Sahih al-Bukhari
V:81, Ch. 39).
[127] For hadith al-Ghadir
see Sunan Ibn Majjah, Introduction,
Ch. 11 143; Musnad al Imam Ahmad IV:281
(Beirut: Dar Sadir).
[128] For elaboration on this theme, see the Appendix.
[129] For the second Caliph's words to the consultative
members, see Mukhtasar Ta'rikh Ibn Asakir XVIII:35.
[130] This is the tendency of the school of those who uphold
the rights of the Prophetic Household and of Shi ism.
[131] This is the tendency of the remaining, Sunni schools.
For details see al-'Allamah al-Sayyid Murtada al-`Askari, Ma`allim al-madrasatayn; cf. Dr.
Muhammad Salam Madkur, Manahij al-ijtihad
(Kuwait: Matba`at jami`ah).
[132] Sahih
al-Bukhari VIII:161 ("Kitab
al-i`tisam") Note the
situations where their devotional acts do not accord with the text. For example,
upon failing to send Usamah's detachment and their objection to it; or the time
when a letter was intended to be written, as the Prophet was uttering,
"Come! Let me write you a letter that you may never go astray after I am
gone..." Observe also the situation surrounding the Hudaybiyyah Treaty.
See the books in history and hadiths referred
to so far. For a more detailed discussion, see al-Sayyid al-`Allamah
`Abd al-Husayn Sharaf al-Din, al Muraja'at, edited and
annotated by Husayn al-Radi and introduced by Dr. Hamid al Hafni and
Shaykh Muhammad Fikri Abu al-Nasr (Mu'assasat Dar al-Kitab al-Islami)
[133] Cf. Ibn Hashim, al-Sirah
al-nabawiyyah, Second Part, ed. Mustafa al-Saqqa et al. (Beirut: Dar al-Kunuz al-Adabiyyah),
pp. 316-17. See also Tarikh al-Tabari
II:122.
[134] See al-Qawshaji, Sharh al-tajrid, towards the end of the discussion on the "imamah," where he contends
that "Me tasks of those in charge were devoted to spreading the Call of
Islam, and triumph over East and West. But triumphing over kingdoms cannot be
done without motivating the soldiery to endure peril on the way, that they
might drink deep of the struggle for Islam, until they believe that theirs is
that best of deeds they shall look to on the Day of Judgment. The omission of
this part of the adhan [i.e. "hayya`ala khayr al-`amal], in their view, had to do with giving
priority to the benefit of those tasks over and above devotion in the manner
foreseen by the Holiest Law. The second Caliph thus declared from his minbar that `Three things existed at the
time of the Prophet which I interdicted, forbade and punished: temporary
marriage [mutat al-nisa],
marriage during the pilgrimage [mutat
al-hajj] and `Come to
the best of deeds!'."
[135] See al-Tajj
al-jami lil-usul fi ahadith al-Rasul by Shaykh Mansur 'Ali Nasif (a noted `alim from al-Azhar University)
II:124, "Kit-al hajj" on
Abi jamrah al-Dab`i, who said: "I entered a temporary marriage but
was forbidden by some people. And so I asked Ibn `Abbas, who sanctioned it. I
went to the Ka`bah to sleep, whereupon a protagonist came to me. He said, `May
the minor pilgrimage [`umrah] be accepted and the greater one [hajj]
valid' [Abu Jamrah al-Dab'!] went on: So I went to Ibn `Abbas to
inform him about what I had dreamed. `God is Great! God is Great! ' he said,
`It is the practice of Abu al-Qasim's [i.e. the Prophet]."' It is
equally narrated by Muslim and Bukhari. It is said of `Umran b. Husayn that he
stated, "A verse [ayah] on the temporary marriage was sent down
in God's Book, and so we acted upon it with His Messenger. The Qur'an
did not prohibit it, and the [Messenger] did not forbid it to the day he died.
Likewise with the two Shaykhs: Shaykh Nasif says on the margins that "The mutah was interdicted by `Umar, `Uthman
and Mu`awiyah."
[136] For more details, see al Allamah `Abd al-Husayn
Sharaf al-Din, al-Nass wal ijtihad,
pp. 169, 243.
[137] Cf Sahih al-Bukhari ("Kirab al-ilm") I:37 (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr,1981); cf.
also Ibn Sa`d, al-Tabaqat al-
al-kubra II:242.
[138] Cf. Ibn Sa'd, al-Tabaqat
al-kubra II:248; see also Ibn Athir, al-Kamil fi al-ta'rikh II:318-19.
[139] Tabarsi, al-Ihtijaj
I:75 (Beirut: Nashr Mu assasah al-A`lami, 1983) - Imam. Cf.
Tarikh al-Yaqub'i II:103.
[140] Cf Imam Sayyid Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr, al-Ma'alim al jadidah lil-usul, p.
23ff. It contains ample details concerning the evolution of the master concept
of independent legal judgment. The latter had been avoided because it used to
mean: "Mat principle of jurisprudence which takes individual reasoning as
one of the sources for arriving at judgments. But there was a concerted drive
against this jurisprudential principle at the phase when traditions were being
collected in the time of the Imams and those who transmitted their deeds (to
posterity)..." The kind of independent legal judgment enunciated by many
Sunni schools of jurisprudence (like that of Abu Hanifah) regarded as one of
the jurist's proofs and sources for inferences where there is not plenty of
textual support, stands rejected. As Tusi said: "Neither the syllogism nor
independent legal judgment for me is a proof. In fact, they are not to be used
in legal matters." Nevertheless, as the concept of independent legal
judgment developed and came to consist in the inference of a juridical
decision (al-hukm) from the text - that is,
synonymously with the inferential operation - it was accepted and put to
use. For the divisions, types and scope of independent legal judgment, see
`Allamah Muhammad Taqi al-Haki's al-Usul al-`ammah lil-fiqh al-muqaran, p. 56ff
[141] Muhammad Taqi al-Hakim, al-Usul al-`ammah lil-fiqh al-muqaran, p. 563.
[142] Cf. al-Ma'alim al jadidah lil-usul, p. 40.
.
[143] Please refer to what we have tried to establish in the
Appendix concerning this question: that is, the scope of Imam `Ali's power; his
comprehension of God's Book; his grasp of the "particular" and the
"general" (of its various applications); of the abrogating and
abrogated verses, its provisions and laws, the text's explicit and implicit
senses. See, for example, Suyuti's al-Ittiqan IV:234.
[144] Al-Hakim al-Nisaburi, al-Mustadrak `ala al-Sah'ih III:119, where the author
says, "It was corrected according to conditions set by al-Shaykhayn
[i.e. al-Bukhari and Muslim] and presented by al-Muslim accordingly
(cf. IV:1874. See Sahih al-Tirmidhi's I:130
; al-Nassa'i, al-Sunan
al-kubra V:622; Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal's Musnad IV:217, III:14-7 - Imam. See also Sunan al-Darimi II:432 (Ch. "Fazia'il al Qur'an"?
(Dar Ihya al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah).
[145] On the margins, Imam Baqir al-Sadr points out
the following:
Hadith al-Ghadir
is widely reported in books on traditions by both Shiites and Sunnis. The
experts reckon the number of Companions who reported this hadith to be
over a hundred. Those belonging to the following generation [al-tabi'in] who
relate it number over eighty; those in the second century Hijri who committed
the Qur'an and the traditions to memory nearly sixty individuals.
Cf al-`Allamah al-Amini, Kitab al-Ghadir. In this book, the `Allamah al-Amini
offers a number of hadiths reported
by Zayd b. Arqam in their different version. It appears that Imam al-Sadr
collected these accounts in exactly the same form. (Cf. "al-Ghadir" I:31-6; also, in the Appendix,
see how the hadith in question was
presented, including in Sunan Ibn Majah I:11 (of the Introduction)). See Musnad
Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal IV:281, 368 (Dar Sadir).
[146] The famous hadith
al-thaqlayn, about which we have already given explanation.
[147] Cf Tarikh al-Tabari, "Nusus
al-Saqifah" II:234.
[148] Ibid; see the description of `Umar's
investiture.
[149] See the description of the six consultative members
involved in `Uthman's investiture, see Ta'rikh
al-Tabari II:580. Cf Imam Ali's "Shaqshaqiyyah
Address," Sermon No. 3, Nahj al-balaghah,
edited by Dr. Subhi al-Salih, p. 48.
Also, Ibn Abi al Hadid's commentary on it I:151 ff (ed. Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim; and `Abd al-Fattah
`Abd al-Maqsud), al-Saqifah
wal khilafah, p. 264.
[150] Al-tulaqa is a term used to
describe those who embraced Islam only at the moment when Mecca was gained
over, including Abu Sufyan and his son Muawiyah (Tarikh al-Tabari II:161), this with the knowledge that they were
both among those referred to as "al-muallafat
qullubuhum" (cf. Tarikh al-Tabari II:175).
[151] Their need for Imam `Ali's authority, according to
many textual sources showing their open admission to this effect (cf. Suyuti's Tarikh al-khulafa, p. 171); whereas Imam 'Ali never had to seek the authority of any one of
them in matters of law or its provisions.
[152] Al-Tabaqat al-kubra II:339.
[153] Imam Baqir al-Sadr's appraisal of the first
generation of Companions reveals the extent of objectivity maintained in his treatment
of both the Muslims' history and the role of those who began teaming around
Islam. Secondly, substituting the Companions for the Household was hardly
accepted by many prominent Companions, such as Salman, `Ammar, Abu Dharr, al-Miqdad
and others - they all remained loyal to the Household. Thirdly, although
the ways of the Companions or their utterances prevailed, there was not
complete acceptance that their views were defensible. It suffices to say that
the way of the two Elders (i.e. Caliphs) was proposed to Imam `Ali the day of
consultation, but was not accepted. See the knowledgeable and quite
satisfactory discussion in al-`Allamah Muhammad Taqi al-Hakim, al-Usul al-`ammah lil fiqh al-muqaran, pp. 133-42.
[154] Note the accusation by `Umar b. Khattab, the second
Caliph, against Khalid b. al-Walid of having killed a Muslim and then
turned on his wife (Ta'rikh al-Tabar'i
II:274 [Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah).
[155] Cf Dr. Muhammad Salaam Madkur, Manahij al-ijtihad concerning the emergence of theological (kalamiyyah) and legal (fiqhiyyah) factions and schools in Islam, along
with the disputes that erupted among them. See also Shahrastani, al-Milal wal-nihal I:15ff.
[156] See Dr. Shaybi, al-Silah
bayna al-tasawwuf wal-tashayyu I:12; Dr. `Abd al-`Aziz al
Duri, Muqaddamah fi tar'ikh al-Islam, p. 72.
[157] Cf. Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:696ff See also the description of the situation in Imam `Ali's Address,
where he states, "Nothing was more delightful to me than people swarming
around me, as hyenas do, from every side ...and gathered round like a resting
herd of sheep (Nahj al-balaghah, ed.
Dr. Subhi al-Salih, p. 48 ("al-Shaqshaqivyah")
[158]See what Tabarsi relates in his al-Ihtijaj I:75.
[159] Cf. Usul al-Kafi II:190 (Ch. "Fi qillat `adad al-mu'minin") (Tehran: al-Matba`ah al
Islaamiyyah, 1388 AH).
[160] Consider what Umayyid policy visited upon the Ummah in pastimes, buffoonery, wine drinking,
and brutality and repression against all opponents. On this question, see al-Mas`udi,
Muruj al-dhahab III:214ff; Ibn
`Abd Rabbuh, al-Aqd al farid V:200-02;
Abu al-Faraj al-Asfahani, al-Aghani
First Edition 7:6ff (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1407 AH). Concerning the
Umayyids' frivolous use of wealth, see Sayyid Qutb, al-Adalah al ijtima'iyah fi al-Islam.
[161] A1-Hurr al- Amili, Wasa'il al-Shiah, Fifth Edition, ed. `Abd al-Karim al-Shirazi
XII:39 (Tehran: al-Maktabah al-Islamiyah 1401 - Imam. See the
edited version, Mu'assasah Al al-Bayt (Qum) XV:54 ("Kitab al jihad")
[162] Cf Ibn Idris, al-Sara'ir
III:569 (Qum: Mu'assasah al-Nashr al-Islami), for `Abd Allah al-Sayyari's
narration of words by someone from the Companions.
[163] Ibn Hashim, al-Sirah al-nabawiyyah, ed.
Mustaa al-Saqqa et al I:246.
[164] Nahj al-balaghah,
ed. Dr. Subhi al-Salih, Sermon No. 192, pp. 300-01.
[165] Manaqib Amir al-Mu'min'in II:540, Hadith No. 1045, narrated by Abu Said;
cf. al-Sa'id cf. al-Sahili, al-Rawd
al-ani III:16, n. 1: "The first person to perform the prayer ritual was
`Ali." He also stated that the same was said by Salman, Khabbab, Jabir,
Abu Sa'id. This is repeated in
Tabarani's work.
[166] Al-Nassa'i, al-Sunan
al-kubra, "al-Khasa'is" V:141, Hadith No. 8502.
[167] Ibn Hisham, Sirah
II:95 (Cairo: Matba`ah al-Hijazi, 1937).
[168] Ibid.
[169] Al-Tafsir al-kabir, Third
Edition V:204 (Tehran: Dar Nashr al-Kutub al`Ilmiyyah).
[170] Sahih al-Tirmidhi, ed. Kamat al-Hut
V:596 (Matba`at Dar al-Fikr).
[171] Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:182-83.
Cf. Ibn Kathir, al-Bidayah wal-nihayah
VII:240ff.
[172] Al-Shaykh
al-Nasif, al-Tajj al jami lil-usul II:332. It was
related by al-Bukhari, Muslim and al-Tirmidhi.
[173] Sahih Muskm IV: 1873.
[174] Sahih al-Tirmidhi V:596.
[175] Ibn Kathir, al-Bidayah wal-nihayah VII:357.
[176] Al-Shaykh
Mansur `Ali Nasif, al-Tajj al jami
lil usul ahadith al-rasul III:334,
Third Bamuq edition (Istanbul: Dar Ihya'' al-Kutub al-`Arabiyyah,
1961).
[177] al-Tajj
al jami VII:351.
[178] al-Tajj al
jami III:336.
[179] al-Tajj al
jami, pp. 351-52.
[180] Ghayat al-ma'mul, Sharh al jami lil usul, III:336,
n. 6, where it is said, "And with this: `Ali was best loved by
God."
[181] Cf Ibn Manzur, MukhtasarTa'rikh
Ibn Asakir XVII:356ff and XVIII up
to p. 51.
[182] Al-Shaykh al-Mufid, al-Irshad, p. 22, as
narrated by `Abd Allhh b. Mas'ud.
[183] al-Tajj al
jami lil usul VIII:335; al-Suyuti,
Tar'ikh al-khulafa ; p. 170; Ibn Hajar, al Sawaiq al-muhriqah, pp. 126-27.
[184] Al-Suyuti, al-Ittiqan
IV:234.
[185] Nahj al
balaghah, ed. Dr. Subhi al-Salih, Sermon No. 210, p. 325. See also
alMajlisi, Bihar al-anwar 92:99 (Tehran).
[186] al-Ittiqan IV:233; cf. Tabaqat Ibn Sad II:338; Ibn Hajar, al-Sawa'iq al'-muhriqah, p. 127.
[187] Ta'rikh al-khulafa p.166.
[188] Recorded in Suyuti's al-Ittiqan IV:233.
[189] Al-Qanduzi, Yanail
al-mawaddah I:68-9.
[190] Hilyat al-awliya I:68, Fifth Edition (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al Arabiyyah).
[191] Ibn Kathir, at-Bidayah wal-nihayah VII:359; cf, al-Suyuti, Tarikh al-Khulafa p. 171
[192] Ibid VII:373; Ibn Hajar, al-Sawa`iq al-muhriqah, p. 127.
[193] Ibn Sa`d, al-Tabaqat al-kubra III:339,
Second Edition (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al`Ilmiyyah, 1408 AH).
[194] Tar'ikh al-khulafa, p. 171; al-Sawaiq al-muhriqah by Ibn Hajar, p. 127.
[195] Ibid.
[196] Cf. Ibn Na`im al-Isbahani, Ma nazala min al Qur'an fi
Ali, compiled by Shaykh al-Mahmudi, p. 130ff.
[197] al-Haskani, Shawahid
al-tanzil I:360-61, First Edition.
[198] al-Tajj al jami lil-usul IV:181. Also related by al-Bukhari and
Muslim in Kitab-al tafsir.
[199] Ibn Na'im, Ma
nazala min al Qur'an fi Ali,
ed. Mahmudi, p. 172.
[200] Abu Na'im, Ma
nazala min al Qur'an fi
Ali, p. 104. Cf the notes where he
relates accounts which have different chains of transmission. See also Ibn
Hajar, al-Sawaiq al-muhriqah, p. 152.
[201] Cf. Tafsir al-kashshaf III:559.
[202] Hadith al-Manzilah, already cited above. Cf. al-Tajj al jami
lil-usul III:332 (recounted
also by al-Bukhari, Muslim and al-Tirmidhi).
[203] Cf. Abu Hurayrah's account, where `Umar says, "I have
never desired to command as I did that day, I leapt toward it" (al-Tajj al jami lil-usul III:331; recounted by al-Bukhari and
Muslim).
[204] Sahih Muslim, IV: 1873.
[205] Sahih al-Tirmidhi
V:596. Cf. Ibn Hajar, al-Sawa'iq
al-muhriqah, p. 143; cf. the account al-Tajj al jami lil-usul
III:333.
[206] al-Tajj al jami lil-usul
IV:207. Two narrators, al-Tirmidhi and Muslim, relate that `Umar b.
Umm Salamah, the Prophet's stepson, had said,
When the verse on "purificatio" (tathir) was revealed in the
house of Umm Salamah the Prophet called on Fatimah, Hasan, Husayn and `Ali He
then draped them in a shroud, saying: "Lord these are the members of my
household. So remove all sully and wholly purify them." Umm. Salamah
asked, "Am I not among them, O Prophet, He answered, "Do not change your
place, as you are fortunate."
[207] Ibn al-Mufaddal
al-Raghib al-Isfahani, al-Dhariah
ila makarim al-Shariah, First Edition, edited and annotated by Taha `Abd al-Ra'uf
Sad (Cairo: Maktabat al Kulliyyah al-Azhariyyah, 1393 Al-1), p.
29. For the meaning of al-`ismah ("impeccancy'"),
see Muhammad Taqi al-Hakim, al-sul
al-`Aammah lil-fiqh al-muqarin, p. 174.
[208] Nasif, al-Tajj al jami lil-usul, III:334; see also al-Suyuti's Tarikh al-khulafa ; p. 169.
[209] Sahih al-Tirmidhi V:594.
[210] Al-Kashshaf I:649, where al-Zamakhshari says in a note on the history of the hadith, "It was recounted by Ibn Abi Hatim through Salamah b.
Kahil, who said, `He gave me his ring in alms while bent over [in prayer], and
it was revealed"' - i.e. the Qur'anic verse; similarly related by
Ibn Mardawayh, through Sufyan al-Thawri through Ibn Sunan, through al-Dahhak,
through Ibn 'Abbas. Cf. also Asbab al-nuzul, p. 134, where al-Wahidi says it was revealed about `Ali
[211] Sahih al-Tirmidhi, Ch. "Fada'il al-Imam Ali'; cf. al-Tajj al jami lil-usul III:335.
[212] Ibid.
[213] The ninth surat,
otherwise called Surat al-Tawbah.
[214] Musnad al-Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal I:3 (Dar nadir); Tafsir al-Kashshaf al-Zamakhshari II:243; also the account given in Sahih
al-Tirmidhi V:594.
[215] Al-Kashshaf
[216] Al-Wahidi stated that the verse came down at
Ghadir Khum (Asbab al nuzul, p. 135).
[217] Sahih Muslim IV:1874.
[218] al-Tajj al jami lil-usul, III:333. This is reported by Zay d b. Arqam about the Prophet, and is also
found in Sahih al-Tirmidhi (V:591).
[219] Musnad al-Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal, IV:271, 368 (Dar Sadir). Cf, Tafsir Ibn
Kathir I:22; "Introduction," Sunan Ibn Majah I, Ch. 11. See also
the full and satisfactory investigations in Asanid
al-Hadith al-Ghadir by al-Allamah al-Amini; and
also Ibn Kathirs al-Bidayah wa al-nihayah
VII:360-61, where it is reported through several
lines of transmission.
[220] al-Tajj al jami lil-usul
III:337. It is separated reported here:
"May God have mercy on `Ali. Wherever he roams let Truth roam with
him..."
[221] On the report concerning the revelation of the Verse
of Ghadir and the fact that it was
on 18 Dhu al-Hujjah, see al-Suyuti, al-Ittiqan I:75. Cf. also al-Wahidi, Asbab al nuzul, p. 135.
[222] Mananaqib Amir al-muminin I:119, by al-Hafiz Muhammad b. Salman al-Kufi alQadi (one of
the eminent figures of the third century), edited by al-Shaykh al Mahmudi.
Majma` ihya' al-thaqafah al-istamiyyah (Qum, 1412 A H).
[223] Musnad al-Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal IV:281. When `Ali called for witnesses from the
crowd, thirty persons attested that they heard this utterance from the Prophet.
Ibn Kathir, al-Bidayah wa al-nihayah
VII:360.
[224] Cf. Sahih al-Tirmidhi, p. V:597. See also Ibn Kathir, al-Bidayah
wa al-nihayah VII:369; al-Tajj al jami lil-usul , III:336.
[225] Musnad al-Imam Ahmad
IV:369; cf. Ta'rikh Ibn Kathir VII:355.
[226] Ta'rikh al-Tabari
II:25, 65-6 (Beirut: al-Maktabah al-`ilmiyyah).
[227] Sa`d's account as given by al-Bukhari and Muslim
- see ns. [54] and [55].
[228] Al-Suyuti, Ta'rikh
al-khulafa; p. 171.
[229] Ibn Hajar, al-Sawaiq
al muhriqah, p. 123. See
also al-Suyuti, Ta'rikh al-khulafa;
p. 173.
[230] Al-Qanduzi
al-Balkhi al-Hanafi, Yanabi
al-mawaddah, First Edition II:58 (Beirut: Manshurat al-A`lami).
Cf. Ibn Hajar, al-Sawaiq al-muhriqah, p. 127.
[231] That the Qur'an
is the first and fundamental source for religious law is a matter of consensus
for the Islamic community. See `Allamah Muhammad Taqi al-Hakim, al- Usul al-ammah lil fiqh al-muqaran, p. 101.
[232] Al-Zamakhshari, al-Kashshaf I:525.
[233] The term taghut applies
to any person in charge who strays, and everything worshipped besides God. It
is also applied to the unbeliever, Satan and idols (al Tariihi, Majma` al-Bahra yn I:276).
[234] See how "Surrat al-bara'ah' was delivered, in
Musnad al-Imam Ahmad b. Hanbal I:3 (Dar Sadir). Also, the text of
the hadith in Ibn Hajar's al-Sawa`iq al-muhriqah, p. 122.
[235] See the text in Sermon No. 18, Nahj al-Balaghah,
ed. Dr. Subhi al-Salih, p. 60-1. Cf. as Sawa`iq al-muhriqah, p. 152, where the
words of Imam Zayn al `Abidin are recorded in a supplication:
To whom shall those who
succeed this Ummah turn, once
this community's beacons have been extinguished.
The Ummah draws closer to
disunion and mutual disagpreement. But God says: "Be not like those who
became disunited and who disagreed after there came to them the proofs."
And so, only those are to be relied on to convey the proof and to expound the
judgment who are the children of the Imams of True Guidance -
candlelights in the gloom whom God offered as proof to His servants. God does
not vainly leave His creation without a proof. Do you know or have ever found
them to be anything but the branches of the Blessed Tree, the special elect
from whom God has removed all defilement and truly purified. He has absolved
them of evil and set forth their love for the Book...
[236] See p. 113 Appendix (print).
[237] Abu Naim, Manazala
min al Quran fi Ali, ed. al-Mahmudi, p. 266. The editor mentions the
chains of authorities in the notes. Cf. al-Suyuti, al-Dar al-manthur VI:260 (Manshurat al-Mar`ashi).
[238] Nahj al-balaghah, Sermon No. 158,
p. 223.
[239] This question is raised in al-Murajaat between `Allamah Sharaf al-Din and Shaykh
Salim al-Bashri (of Azhar Mosque).
[240] Cf. Ibn Sa`d, al-Tabaqat
al-kubra II:242-44 (Beirut: Tab`at Beirut lil-Tiba`ah,
1985).
[241] Translator's emphasis.
[242] Sahih al-Bukhari I:37 (q.v.
"Kitab al ilm," Ch. "Kitab
al al-ilm'; Cf. "Kitab al-I'tisam" lithographed
copy of printing by Dir al-`Amirah, Istanbul; Beirut. Dar al-Fikr).
[243] Ibn Abi al-Hadid, Sharh Nahj al-balaghah III:97 (Cairo: Dar al-Kutub al`Arabiyyah
al-Kubra).
[244] Ta'rikh al-Tabari II:577 (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah).
[245] Ibn Athir, al-Nahayah fi gharib al-hadith wal-athar;
ed. al-Tanahi V:246 (q.v "Hajar")
[246] Ibn al-Athir, al-Kamil fi tarikh II:218 (Dar Sadir).
[247] Al-Tabaqat al-kubra II:248-50.
[248] `Allamah `Abd Sharaf al-Din, al-Muraja`at, p. 472.