Original Source of Belief in Imamah and Faith in The
Appearance of the Twelfth Imam (peace be upon him)
Question:
From which Islamic sources has the
position and esteem (i`tibar) of the Imamah and leadership and
faith in the reappearance of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) been
understood? And what effect have events and the passage of time had on the
completion of this principle?
Answer:
According to a verse of
Qur’an, Imamah is a station that was granted to Ibrahim al-Khalil (peace be upon him) after that
great test—trial by kalimat (words) [52]. According to traditions that are consecutively
narrated (mutawatir) and which both Shi‘a and Sunnis have related, this
station was also placed in the Ahl al-Bait of the Prophet (peace be upon him
and his family) and they have been singled out for this great Divine grant.
On this basis it has been established that in every era an individual
from this family who possesses the necessary capabilities, including knowledge
and infallibility, will be responsible for the station of Imamah and
leadership.
Such an individual is the proof (hujjat) of Allah, equal of
the Qur’an, guide of the people, and protector of the religion and Divine law. Imamah is a principle that has been established from the
time of the Prophet of Allah (peace be upon him and his family) until our time
and will continue from our time until the end of the world. The point of its
apparent perfection and complete flowering will be during the age of the
gladdening reappearance of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) and
establishment of his united just world government, during which the world will
be filled with equity, justice, goodness, and blessings through the blossoming
of all human potentials and evolution of thoughts and becoming apparent of
terrestrial and celestial blessings.
The agenda of
forming a new world community which must end in spreading justice and the
sovereignty of tawhid (Divine unity) is understood from the core of
Islamic teachings. The Noble Qur’an in several chapters has announced this and
hundreds of prophetic traditions have related the world’s adoption of Islam and
the government of justice and establishment of complete security in the land
after the reappearance of the promised Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return), who
is from the descendents of ‘Ali and Fatimah (peace
be upon her) and shares the name and agnomen (kunya) of the Prophet
(peace be upon him and his family).
Belief in the appearance of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his
return) with the mentioned qualities is something which has been mentioned in
Islam’s primary texts. According
to consecutively-narrated (mutawatir) traditions, the Prophet (peace be
upon him and his family) has given news of this blessed event and requested his
‘ummat (community) to be in wait of that consequential day.
Though the issue of appearance is deduced from the general tidings
pertaining to Islam’s becoming supreme in the world and truth overcoming
falsehood, this does not mean that the issue of appearance is solely a concept
deduced from the purport of traditions, since the text and very words of
narrations point to it independently, and most of the faithful rely one these
very texts that explicitly point to the appearance of Imam Mahdi (may Allah
hasten his return) and its signs.
Once it is known that the foundation of the existence of this
belief is the general tidings and texts of traditions, it can be said that
historical conditions and events that occurred after the Prophet (peace be upon
him and his family) had no role in its coming into existence.
This is because the origin of this idea is the era of prophecy and
the traditions related to it exceed one thousand traditions, which are narrated
in books traditions, commentary, and many other books. Prominent Sunni scholars have also written independent
books about it, and books written more than twelve centuries ago by the
greatest experts and researches of Islamic sciences clearly indicate that the
person of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) gave tidings
about the issue of the appearance of the Promised Mahdi (may Allah hasten his
return), and his companions, the followers (tabi`in) of the companions,
and after them other generations of people have narrated them.
The Qur’an and Messianism (Mahdawiyyat)
QUESTION:
Which verse of the Noble Qur’an can be cited regarding the
authority (wilayat) of the twelve Imams (peace be upon them) and the
just government of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) and the supremacy
of Islam over the world?
Answer:
The verses from whose purport it is understood that the twelve
Imams—may Allah elevate their word—have authority and Imamah are many in
number.
Among them is the verse:
إِنَّمَا
أَنْتَ
مُنْذِرٌ
وَلِكُلِّ
قَوْمٍ هَادٍ
“You
are but a warner, and every people has a guide.”[53]
And the verse:
لاَ
يَنَالُ
عَهْدِي
الظَّالِمِينَ
“My covenant reaches not the
oppressors (and only that group of your descendants is worthy of this position
who are pure and infallible).”[54]
and the verse:
أَفَمَنْ
يَهْدِي
إِلَى الْحَقِّ
أَحَقُّ أَنْ
يَتْبَعَ
“Thus is one who guides to the
truth worthier of being followed?”[55]
These verses indicate this point since from them one understands
that society is not without an Imam, the infallibility of the holder of the
station of Imamah, and his being more knowledgeable than others, and
this issue is among the exclusive convictional principles of the Shi‘a. And
from the verse:
يَا
أَيُّهَا
الَّذِينَ
آمَنُوا
أَطِيعُوا
اللهَ
وَأَطِيعُوا
الرَّسُولَ
وَأُولِي الأَمْرِ
مِنْكُمْ
“O’ ye who have
brought faith! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among
you (the trustees of the Prophet).”[56]
This doctrine of the Shi‘a—that the
Imam and ruler must be infallible—is understood. This is because in this verse
obedience to those in authority has been commanded in an absolute manner.
Obedience to the Prophet, which is in all affairs, has been expressed together
with obedience to those in authority in one word—the imperative verb أطيعوا, “obey!”
It is obvious that someone whom the
believers have been ordered to obey absolutely in such a way must be infallible
and far removed from errors and mistakes, and as it is undisputed that from
among the Islamic sects only the Shi‘a believe in the infallibility of the
Imam.
In addition to this, commentaries and
reliable traditions also indicate that the intent of the noble verse “Obey
Allah…” and other verses is the twelve Imams (peace be upon them), and in these
commentaries, the blessed names of these personages are also mentioned
explicitly.
As for the supremacy of Islam in the
world and its overcoming all religions, it is sufficient to pay attention to
verses 32 and 33 of Surah at-Tawba, verse 28 of Surah al-Fath, verses 6 and 8
of Surah al-Saff, and numerous other verses. In them, the promise of appearance
and true religion’s overcoming all religions has been given, a promise that
will come to pass with the appearance of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his
return), and this is inviolable.
In regard to the appearance of Imam
Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) in particular, many verses have been
elucidated to refer to it, which exceed one hundred verses in all. The book Al-Mahajja
fi ma Nazala fi al-Qa’im al-Hujja (The Final Destination Regarding What
Has Been Revealed About the Twelfth Imam) has collected all of them.
Among those verses is this verse:
وَعَدَ
اللهُ
الَّذِينَ
آمَنُوا
مِنْكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا
الصَّالِحَاتِ
لِيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ
فِي الأَرْضِ
كَمَا
اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ
مِنْ قَبْلِهِمْ
وَلِيُمَكِّنَنَّ
لَهَمُ
دِيْنَهُمْ
الَّذِي
ارْتَضَى
لَهُمْ
وَلِيُبِدَّلَنَهُم
مِنْ بَعْدِ
خَوْفِهِمْ
أَمْناًا يَعْبُدُونِنِي
لاَ
يُشْرِكُونَ
بِي شَيْئاُ
وَمَنْ
كَفَرَ
بَعْدَ
ذَلِكَ
فَأُولَئِكَ
هُمُ
الفَاسِقُونَ
“Allah
has promised those who have believed among you and do good deeds that He shall
certainly make them rulers in the earth as He made rulers those before them and
shall make firm for them their religion which He has chosen for them and shall
change their fear into security; they will worship Me and associate none with
Me, and whoever disbelieves after that, it is they who are the iniquitous.”[57]
and this verse:
وَنُرِيدُ
أَنْ نَمُنَّ
عَلى
الَّذِينَ اسْتُضْعِفُوا
فِي الأَرْضِ
وَنَجْعَلَهُمْ
أَئِمَّةً
وَنَجْعَلَهُمُ
الْوَارِثِينَ
“And we
desire bestow a favor on those deemed weak in the land and make them leaders
and make them inheritors.”[58]
and the verse:
وَلَقَدْ
كَتَبْنَا
فِي
الزَّبُورِ
مِنْ بَعْدِ الذِّكْرِ
أَنَّ
الأَرْضَ
يَرِثُهَا
عِبَادِي
الصَّالِحُونَ
“And verily We have written in the Zabur
(Psalms) after the Remembrance that my righteous servants will inherit the
earth.”[59]
Belief in the Appearance of the Mahdi and Savior and
the Appearance of False Mahdis
QUESTION:
Belief in the
appearance of the Mahdi and savior has caused the appearance of false Mahdis
throughout history, and some make this circumstance a justification for setting
aside this idea. To what extent can this viewpoint be accepted?
Answer:
This viewpoint is absolutely unacceptable, or else
humanity must set aside all positive viewpoints. This is because all of them
have more or less been subject to misuse. All of the individuals who claimed to
be God or regarded themselves the manifestation of God, united with God, or
regarded God to have taken abode in them have all misused the principle of belief
in Allah. This action in no way harms the issue of belief in Allah.
Similarly, all of the false prophets who claimed
prophecy and misled a people do not transmit any damage to the correctness of
the principle of prophecy. This issue arises in more or less every field and
industry, but that incident brings no harm to that field itself.
In short, if any name or word that has a good and attractive
meaning has been used for its opposite, this does not damage these values and
good affairs themselves, such as if a betrayer has been called trustworthy, an
oppressor called just, an ignorant person called learned, a sinner called
God-fearing, or if all treacheries and oppressions have been committed in the
name of well-wishing and seeking reform.
The Effect of Social, Economic, and Political Factors
in Religious Thought
QUESTION:
What effect have social, economic, and political factors had on
religious thoughts and creeds and on belief in the appearance of the Mahdi (may
Allah hasten his return)?
Answer:
From the viewpoint of the godless worldview, all affairs must be
attributed to historical and material causes.
However, from the
viewpoint of the religious worldview, the source of that which is genuine and
true from among various ideas and creeds is revelation, the call of the
prophets, and the inborn comprehension of humanity, which is referred to as the
guidance of reason, natural disposition, revelation, and prophecy.
In the eyes of this viewpoint, all of the devious courses and
harmful thoughts are the effect of material and historical causes, personal
goals, and deficiency of culture of society and its upbringing. Religious creeds taken from revelation and
prophecy are all genuine and actual and have a place in humanity’s nature.
History, the
passage of time, human knowledge, and material causes do not bring them into
existence. Rather, the source of conviction about matters such as the principle
of the messengership of the prophets and Imamah of the Imams (peace be
upon them) and all true creeds is reason, human disposition, and revelation
from Allah.
On this basis, no social, economical, or political factor has had
or has an effect even in the appearance of belief in the appearance of Mahdi
the Savior (may Allah hasten his return). The beginning and source of it is the narrations of
the prophets, the celestial books, and the guidance, narrations, and words of
the person of the Final Prophet (peace be upon him and his family), Imam Amir
al-Mu’minin (peace
be upon him), and the remaining Imams (peace be upon them).
Though there have been false claims regarding being the Mahdi
based on seeking rank and political aims, by analysis and recognition the
original source of the appearance of these claims and the appearance of false
claimants we reach the reality that an uncontested reality has been involved
around which these claims and distortions have come about and been made tools
by individuals.
In the same way, regarding belief in Allah, revelation, and
prophecy itself we see that some realities exist and there is a ground for its
acceptance in people’s harts, and opportunistic individuals, abusing this fact,
have throughout history made claims of Godhead or prophecy.
And the issue of the
Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) as well—since it was raised by the Prophet
(peace be upon him and his family) himself and the companions have heard and
related it from him—is a reality which has been accepted by all.
For this reason it has been abused and individuals have made it
means for differing objectives, most of which have been political.
If the issue of the Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) did not
have reality, individuals would not have resorted to such distortion with
regard to it. Thus, these abuses themselves confirm the fact that
this issue has been accepted as a reality by all.
It is possible
for events to guide humanity to realities, just as Ibrahim (peace
be upon him), the great monotheist, taught recognition of Allah to people by
use of events.
When night set, that personage saw a star. In the beginning, he said, “This is my Lord.” But when
the star set he said;
لاَ
أُحِّبُ
الآَفِلِينَ
By making use of the incident of the rising and setting of the
star, Ibrahim (peace be upon him) taught people that the
star cannot be God.
After that, the moon also
rises and sets, and from this incident as well he concludes that the moon, too,
cannot be God.
Then, the sun rises and sets and, in the same way, he reaches the
same conclusion about it.
In this way he seeks aversion to all polytheistic beliefs and
guides the people to the Creator of all the world’s inhabitants.
Thus, events can
lead people to realities, but credal realities cannot be considered the effects
of events.
Yes, it can be said that the passage of time caused a
strengthening of people’s belief in the family of ‘Ali (peace be upon him) and
deepening of Shi‘a thought in their hearts. But if someone says that Shiaism and the occultation
of the Imam (peace be upon him) were originated and completed by the passage of
time, this is false, since many proofs, which have been pointed out in the
previous discussions, belie this view.
No one can say
that the traditions of the Imams (peace be upon them), all of which they have
related from the tongue of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family), are
all forged, since all off them, in addition to consecutive narration, have
external contexts with themselves. In reality, they are like the news of the
martyrdom of ‘Ammar, when the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his
family) said,
تَقْتُلُكَ
الْفِئَةَ الْبَاغِيَةُ."
No one said that after ‘Ammar was martyred by Mu`awiyah and his army, this tradition was forged, i.e.
the tradition is an effect of that event. This is because before this event, the companions
would relate this tradition. The issue of the Imamah of the Imams (peace
be upon them) is the same way, regarding which it has been related from three
of them, that is ‘Ali and Imam Hasan and Imam Husayn, that the Prophet (peace
be upon him and his family) said,
“The number of
Imams is twelve, the last of whom shares my name.” And it transpired exactly in
this way in the external world. In this situation, none can claim that these
traditions are spurious and were forged after the occurrence of these events.
“Mahdi” in a Special Meaning and Technical Usage
Is “Mahdi” a specific label and title referring to a particular
person with particular qualities and distinctions or a general concept and
title applied to everyone Allah has guided? In other words, is the Mahdi and belief in Mahdawiyyat
related to person or a category?
Answer:
The concept of the word “Mahdi” is a general concept that is
permissible to use, according to the language and common usage, for anyone that
Allah has guided. With this
concept, all of the prophets and legatees (awsiya’) are “Mahdi” (guided)
and using this word for the person of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his
family), Amir al-Mu’minin, Imam Hasan, Imam Husayn, and the remaining
Imams (peace be upon them) is permissible since all of them were “Mahdi” and
guided. Rather, using this word to refer to other individuals were raised and
attained guidance in the school of those personages is permissible.
For example, the companions of
Imam Husayn (peace be upon him) were all guided. Similarly, using the word for eminent Shi‘a, or rather
all Shi‘a or all who have been guided to the truth and are on guidance is
permissible. However, everyone knows that the purport of “Mahdi” which the
Messenger (peace be upon him and his family) said was a particular label and
title reserved for a specific and unusually mighty person about whose
appearance the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) has given tidings and
has invited his Ahl al-Bait (peace be upon them) and all the Muslims to be
among those awaiting his appearance. Some of these prophetic traditions are:
اَلْمَهْدِي
مِنْ وُلْدِي.
اَلْمَهْدِي
مِنْ
عِتْرَتِي
مِنْ وُلْدِ
فَاطِمَةَ.
اَلْمَهْدِي
مِنْ
وُلْدِكَ.
“Mahdi” in the meaning of “guided”, as per the various meanings of
“guidance”, such as “showing the way,” “conveying to the desired object,” and
other instances is also used for non-humans, and the verse:
رَبَّنَا
الَّذِي
أَعْطَى
كُلَّ شَيْءٍ
خَلَقَهُ
ثُمَّ هَدى
“He said, Our Lord is the One
Gave every existent what is necessary for its creation, then guided.”[65]
In spite of all this, it appears that by studying the instances in
which this word has been used, the conclusion is reached that “guidance” is
generally used for individuals in whom Allah’s guidance has had an effect.
On this basis, it
must be said:
اَلْمَهْدِيُّ
مَنْ هَدَاهُ
اللهُ وَقَبْلَ
هَدَايْتَهُ
وَاهْتَدَى
بِهَا
بِعِنَايَةِ
مِنْهُ
وَتَوْفِيقَهُ.
That is, one who has received
Allah’s guidance is “Mahdi.” In
other words, guidance in the meaning of “showing the path” has been directed at
him and though the special attention and tawfiq of Allah, it has born
fruit in him, for which the loftiest examples are the prophets and Imams (peace
be upon them).
According to
reliable traditions, “Mahdi” is the title of the same promised personage of the
end of time whose genealogy and qualities have even been pointed to in reliable
traditions, which cannot be applied to anyone except the twelfth Imam, the son
of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (peace
be upon him). The title “Mahdi” in the meaning of the receiver of Allah’s
guidance, reviver of Islam, one who will fill the world with equity and
justice, and possessor of distinguished qualities, was first used with regard
to that personage and this took place in the time of the Prophet (peace be upon
him and his family) himself through his person, and the Mahdi in the sense of
savior and redeemer—and other synonymous words like this from Allah—are solely
his titles.
And mahdawiyyat as a concept of a category is not
understood from any of the narrations related from the Prophet (peace be upon
him and his family) or Imams (peace be upon them).
Controversy Regarding the Date of Birth of Imam Mahdi
(may Allah hasten his return)
How can the
controversy about the date of birth of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his
return), which some say corresponds to the number of the letters of the word نور
(“nur,” light) – 256 – while according to some traditions, it took place in the
year 255 A.H., be explained. In what year did the occultation of that personage
take place?
Answer:
Dispute about such matters does not
harm the basic topic or cause an enigma.
Such disagreement exists with regard to
the date of birth of most historical personalities; in fact in many cases their
dates of birth and death are unknown.
The disagreement about the date of
birth of Imam Sahib al-‘Amr (may Allah hasten his return) is less than the
disagreement existing about the date of birth of some of the Imams and the
Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) himself.
The reliable opinion is 255 A.H., which
Fadl ibn Sha¤han al-Nayshapuri—who is one of the major traditionists and a
contemporary of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (peace be upon him) - has related, and his
intermediary is a person like Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Hamza ibn Husayn ibn
‘Ubaydullah ibn ‘Abbas ibn ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (peace be upon him).
As for the occultation of Imam Sahib
al-‘Amr (may Allah hasten his return):
From the very time of birth the public
did not have permission to visit him in the usual manner, and his venerable
father would only grant special companions and Shi‘a the felicity of visiting
his peerless son and كلمة
الله باقية(Allah’s
remaining word). The commencement of the minor occultation, which was also the
beginning of that personage’s Imamah, took place on the day of martyrdom
of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (peace be upon him), that is in the year 260
A.H.
A point which must be mentioned here is
that the coming up of the issue of the occultation of the Imam was not
unexpected for the Shi‘a and believers in Imamah when it occurred, since
it had been referred to before that time in many traditions, and the people
knew that Imam Sahib al-‘Amr (may Allah hasten his return) will have to
occultations—a short occultation called “sughra” and “qusra” and
a long occultation called “kubra” and “tula”.
The detailed report of that has been
mentioned completely in the books and usul (books of principles) of the
Shi‘a which were written before the birth of Imam Sahib al-Zaman (may Allah
hasten his return).
Consensus of the Shi‘a Regarding the Imamah of Imam
Sahib al-Amr (may Allah hasten his return) after the Demise of Imam Hasan
al-‘Askari (peace be upon him)
QUESTION:
According to what Nawbakhti has written
the books of Shi‘a sects, the Shi‘a after Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (peace be upon him) split up into fourteen
sects. To what extent is this statement correct and until what time were these
sects extant?
ANSWER:
As has passed, Nawbakhti writes:
The Shi‘a after the demise of Imam
Hasan al-‘Askari (peace be upon him) were divided into
fourteen sects. However, it appears that there has been some exaggeration in
this view, since he and the remaining writers of books pertaining to sects have
collected all the views that have been forwarded—even if held by only one
person who himself did not remain firm in that opinion until the end. It may
very well be that they have mentioned “sects” about which using the word “sect”
or “group” would not be correct.
This is because the number of their
believers, if they had more than one individual, is not known. It does not
appear that they exceeded a few people. Or it is not known until what time and
to what extent they were firm in their opinion; thus, they should not be
counted as sects, or else the number of sects would reach the hundreds or
thousands.
Shaykh Mufid and Shaykh Tusi, may Allah have mercy on
them, have also forwarded this same view.
Shaykh Mufid in the second volume of Al-Fusul
al-Mukhtara, narrating from al-Nawbakhti, mentions the names of these sects
and says: None of these sects except the Shi‘a exist in our time – 372 A.H.
Thus, it becomes known that these sects
have not existed to an extent that they be worthy of being pointed out at all.
Of course, if an opinion is attributed
to them, even if it has no clear follower, it is necessary to research it, as
Shaykh Mufid and Shaykh Tusi have performed, and they have
proven the falsity of the views of all of these sects except the Twelver Shi‘a.
In summary, books of sects and schools
of thought have been involved in carelessness and exaggeration in counting
groups and sects.
Thus, such material in books cannot be
relied upon - except in case of sects that exists even today or whose existence
as a group is affirmed by reliable histories and references.
The Twelfth Imam’s Revolution
QUESTION:
Is the abundance the titles of the Imam
of the Age because of the profusion of his personal, spiritual, and physical
characteristics, or is it on account of the vastness of his reformative
actions?
ANSWER:
It is understood from the traditions
that the blessed names of the twelfth Imam (may Allah hasten his return) are:
Qa’im (The Riser), Mahdi (The Guided), Gha’ib (The Absent), and Hujjat (The
Proof). In addition, various traditions mention him with titles such as
Hujjatullah (The Proof of Allah), Khalifatullah (Caliph of Allah), and al-Qa’im
(The Riser). The reason for the abundance of his titles is the same two factors
mentioned above. Of course, out of these titles, some are more well known than
others.
It is possible that conditions in a
particular time cause people to pay greater attention to one of these titles or
qualities or that a particular aspect of the issue be discussed more, and
consequently speakers, writers, and poets give more attention to that title or
aspect. This is similar to the “most beautiful names” (al-asma’ al-husna)
of Allah, in which individual circumstances or prevailing conditions cause
people to give more attention to one of those names and call Him by it, such as
“Al-Shafi” (The Healer), “Al-Salam” (The Security), “Al-Hafiz” (The Protector),
or “Al-Raziq” (The Sustainer). And this is not to mean that the remaining “most
beautiful names” do not have a reason for being attributed to Allah.
Thus, each of the names and titles of the
Imam of the Time (may Allah hasten his return) refer to one of his qualities or
actions, and most of them have been mentioned in traditions that broach the
actual issue of the twelfth Imam and his reappearance. That is, that personage
was well known by these names and titles years before he himself or his father
were even born.
Regarding the fact that the twelfth
Imam is the same as the Mahdi and the Mahdi is no different from the twelfth
Imam, eminent Sunni scholars agree with the Shi‘a. For this very reason
individuals like Abu Dawud - author of the book Sunan (prophetic
character) - have narrated traditions of the twelve Imams, and among his
titles, his being promised by the prophets and his personal excellencies and
genealogy are referred to.
The title
“Al-Qa’im” (The Riser)
QUESTION:
As everyone knows, one of the titles of
the Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) is “Al-Qa’im” (The Riser). A tradition
has been related regarding the reason for his being given this title that
requires contemplation, since it apparently indicates that this title was given
because that personage will reappear after death. Yet we have over
approximately one thousand traditions regarding that personage, his
occultation, and long life, in view of which that tradition cannot be relied
upon. However, if some clarifications about its narrators, text, and meaning
can be given, it would be useful.
ANSWER:
The great scholar Shaykh al-Tusi
narrates an unreliable tradition that apparently indicates that the “Qa’im” was
given this title because he will arise after death. Shaykh al-Tusi has provided
a bit of explanation about this tradition, but before we enter this topic, we
consider it necessary to mention the basics of Imamah in Shiaism, which
verses of the Noble Qur’an, traditions, and rational proofs affirm. These
principles are as follows:
1. Imamah is a Divine covenant,
and individuals—who are worthy of bearing it—are specified and appointed by
Allah, and this Divine selection and appointment is announced to the people by
the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family).
2. The most important conditions of the
Imam are sinlessness and being more knowledgeable than all other people, such
that all be in need of his knowledge, guidance, and direction, which he be free
of need of all, as has been related about Khalil ibn Ahmad that he said about
the Imamah of Amir al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him):
إِحْتِيَاجُ
الْكُلِّ
إِلَيْهِ
وَاسْتِغَنَاؤُهُ
عَنِ
الْكُلِّ
دَلِيلٍ
عَلَى أَنَّهُ
إِمَامٌ
الْكُلِّ.
“The dependence of all others on him and his independence
from all others are proof that he is the Imam of all.”[66]
3. The earth will never be without a Divine
Proof and Imam, and whoever dies without having recognized the Imam of his time
dies the death of ignorance.
4. The Imams, as per the text of mutawatir
traditions from the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family), are twelve
personages.
5. They are twelve and all are from the
Ahl al-Bait (peace be upon them) of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his
family), and according to the meaning of the mutawatir traditions of
Thaqalayn (The Two Weighty Things), they are equals of the Qur’an and shall
never part from the Qur’an.
6. The Imams possess all of the
religious and administrative stations except prophethood, which was sealed with
the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him and his family). And as Imam ‘Ali (peace be
upon him) has said in Nahj al-Balagha, they are قوام الله, or the Divine
Guardians over the
creation, and on the basis of another tradition, they are the ship of
salvation.
لاَ
يَدْخُلُ
الْجَنَّةَ
إِلاَّ مَنْ
عَرَفَهُمْ
وَعَرَفُوهُ
وَلاَ
يَدْخُلُ
النَّارَ
إِلاَّ مَنْ
أَنْكَرَهُمْ
وَهُمْ سَفَنٌ
النَّجَاةِ
وَأَمَانٌ
الأُمَّةِ
مِنَ
الضَّلاَلِ وَالإِخْتِلاِفِ.
“None
shall enter Paradise except one who recognizes them and whom they recognize,
and none shall enter Hell except one who denies them; they are the ships of
salvation and refuge of the ummat from deviation and discord.”[68]
7. The name, qualities, and order of
the Imamah of the Imams (peace be upon them) was specified by the
Prophet (peace be upon him and his family), and in addition, each Imam
specified the following Imam.
These are among the important
foundations of belief in the principle of Imamah, and for every Muslim
who believes in the unseen world and in Allah, messengership, and the
messengership of the Seal of the Prophets (peace be upon him and his family),
the criterion of truth of these fundamentals is a rational proof, Qur’anic
verse, or definite and mutawatir tradition. And most of these
fundamentals can be proven by all three means.
Th e fact that Imamah is a
Divine covenant and Allah specifies it has been argued by rational and Qur’anic
proofs and the consecutively-narrated sunnat. ‘Allamah Hilli has
established one thousand proofs of this issue in Alfain, and in fact
this issue has its roots in the unity of Allah, and like the principle of
Divine Unity, it comprises unity of rulership and authority over creation:
لَهُ
الْحُكْمُ
وَلَهُ
الأَمْرُ
وَهُوَ السُّلْطَانُ
وَهُوَ
الحَاكِمُ
وَهُوَ الوَلِيُّ
وَهُوَ
العَالِمُ
بِمَصَالِحِ
عِبَادِهِ
لاَ أَمْرٌ وَ
لاَ نَهِيٌّ
لِأَحَدٍ دُوْنِهِ.
“His is the command and rule, He is the
King and the Ruler and the One in authority, He is the one who is cognizant of
the interests of His servants. Commanding and Forbidding is for none save Him.”
In the issue of the necessity of
sinlessness and being the most knowledgeable as well, abundant rational, Qur’anic,
and narrational proofs exist, among which is this verse:
أَفَمَنْ
يَهْدِي إِلى
الْحَقِّ
أَحَقُّ أَنْ
يَتْبَعَ
أَمَّنْ لاَ
يَهْدِي
إِلاَّ أَنْ
يُهْدى
“Then is one who guides to the truth more worthy to be
followed, or one who does not find guidance except by being guided?”[69]
The late ‘Allamah has also established
one thousand proofs about the issue of the necessity of sinlessness.
Regarding the principle that the earth
shall not remain without a Proof and Imam, in addition to verses such as:
وَلِكُلِّ
قَوْمٍ هَادٍ
“And every people has a guide.”[70]
وَلَقَدْ
وَصَّلْنَا
لَهُمْ
الْقَوْلَ
“And
certainly we conveyed them the verses of Qur’an continuously.”
يَوْمَ
نَدْعُو
كُلُّ
أُنَاسِ
بِإِمَامِهِمْ
“The day when We will call every people with their leader.”[72]
Mutawatir traditions are
also found, among which is the well-known tradition of Kumail ibn Ziyad from
Amir al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him) which has been mentioned
in Nahj al-Balagha and all other books of Zaydi and Twelver Shi‘a and
even in the reliable books of the Sunnis, such as Tadhkirat ul-Huffaz.
From this it is known that all are agreed that the earth will never be empty of
a Proof; of course, it makes no difference whether the Proof is apparent or
hidden.
And in Sawa`iq and other books
of the Sunnis, a discourse has been related from Imam Zain al-`Abidin (peace be
upon him) in which it has been explicitly mentioned that the world is not
without an Imam from the Ahl al-Bait (peace be upon them).
These principles have even been
explicated in the supplications of the Imams from Ahl al-Bait (peace be upon
them). In this regard, we will suffice with only a portion of the supplication
of the day of `Arafah from Imam Zain al-‘Abidin (peace be upon him). That personage says:
اللَّـهُـمَّ
إِنَّكَ
أَيَّدْتَ
دِينَكَ فِي
كُلِّ
أَوَانٍ
بِإِمَامٍ
أَقَمْتَهُ عَلَمًا
لِعِبَادِكَ
وَ مَنَارًا
فِي
بِلاَدِكَ
بَعْدَ أَنْ
وَصَلْتَ
حَبْلَهُ بِحَبْلِكَ
وَ
جَعَلْتَهُ
الذَّرِيعَةَ
إِلَى
رِضْوَانِكَ
وَ
افْتَرَضْتَ
طَاعَتَهُ وَ
حَذَّرْتَ
مَعْصِيَتَهُ
وَ أَمَرْتَ
بِامْتِثَالِ
أَوَامِرِهِ
وَ
الِانْتِهَآءِ
عِنْدَ
نَهْيِهِ وَ أَن
لاَ
يَتَقَدَّمَهُ
مُتَقَدِّمٌوَ
لاَ يَتَأَخَّرَ
عَنْهُ
مُتَأَخِّرٌ
فَهُوَ عِصْمَةُ
اللاَئِذِينَ
وَ كَهْفُ
الْمُؤْمِنِينَ
وَ عُرْوَةُ
الْمُتَمَسِّكِينَ
وَ بَهَآءُ
الْعَالَمِينَ
“Allah! You have supported your religion in every age with
an Imam whom You established as a standard for Your servants and a beacon in
Your lands, after You linked his covenant with Yours and made him the means of
Your pleasure, made obligatory his obedience and cautioned against his
disobedience, commanded to execute his commands and shun what he forbids and
that none should precede him nor stay back from him. Thus he is the guard of
those seeking refuge and the recourse of the believers, handle of those who
grasp (guidance) and the glory of the inhabitants of the universe.”[73]
Anyone who looks carefully at this
portion of the supplication will both come to recognize the Shi‘a viewpoint
regarding the principle of Imamah and will also understand that this
station and these affairs were established for the Imam from the beginning and
no one has added anything to them.
As for the issue that “Whoever dies
without recognizing the Imam of his time dies the death of ignorance,” this is
also a principle which reliable traditions have conveyed explicitly. The
reliable traditions of Thaqalain (the two weighty things), Safina
(the ship of salvation), and Aman (safety) all indicate this point.
And it has been explicitly mentioned in
mutawatir traditions that the Imams are twelve personages, all of whom
are from the Ahl al-Bait of the Prophet, and eleven of them are from the
progeny of ‘Ali and Fatimah (peace be upon them), the first of them being
Amir al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him), and after him Imam Hasan
al-Mujtaba (peace be upon him), followed by the Prince of Martyrs Imam Husayn
(peace be upon him), and after him nine people from his progeny, of whom the
ninth—who is the twelfth Imam—is Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return).
Thus, since these principles have been
established with firm proofs, eminent scholars such as Shaykh al-Tusi, Shaykh
al-Mufid, Ibn Babawayh, ‘Allamah Majlisi (Allah’s mercy upon them all) have
refuted by relying on these principles the statement of anyone who, previous to
their time or subsequent to it, has said something to the contrary or given
attention to a rare and unaccepted tradition. This is because the buttress of
the proofs of these principles is reliable to an extent that it can even be
claimed that after the principle of Divine unity and prophecy, no principle is
so reliable.
In view of all this, no Shi‘a scholar
has held that the rising of the Qa’im (may Allah hasten his return) will occur
after his death. And if anyone has brought up baseless possibilities, taking
into account the points mentioned and since they are completely against
objective realities, they must not be given any attention, since they have no
scientific value.
After this preface and explanation of
this point, the life and long occultation of the Imam has been established on
the basis of these principles. There remains no room for this tradition that
says the Qa’im (may Allah hasten his return) will rise after death, since this
notion would result in the severing of the thread of Imamah, the earth’s
remaining without the existence of a sinless Imam, and the refutation of many
traditions which indicate the life and long occultation of that personage.
Aside from all of these objections, the
above-mentioned tradition’s chain of narrators is not reliable, and none of the
`Ulama’ or Fuqaha’ (jurists) has relied on such traditions in even a single
secondary issue. This is because one of the narrators is Musa ibn Sa`dan al-Hannat, whom scholars of rijal
(the science of the study of narrators) have described as weak and whose
narration they consider unreliable. He has narrated this tradition from
‘Abdullah ibn Qasim, whom they have titled “The Ever-Lying Hero.” He in turn
narrates from Abu Sa`id al-Khurasani, and if we don’t consider his existence
unknown according to reference books of rijal, then his position—in terms of
being truthful or dishonest—is unclear.
Now, contemplate; how can this
tradition—whose narrator is the champion of fabrication—be relied upon in
opposition to those firm fundamentals and hundreds of reliable traditions?
As for the reason for employing the
title “Al-Qa’im” for the Imam of the Age (may Allah hasten his return):
“Al-Qa’im” means “the one who rises.”
The Imam shall rise against political conditions and religious and social
deviations and fill the world with justice and equity after it had become
filled with injustice and oppression. Additionally, the issue of rising with
the sword and armed struggle is also understood from that title.
Nevertheless, since “rising” has weak
and strong degrees, it can be understood from traditions that all of the Imams
were قائم
بالأمر“Qa’im bi ’l-amr” (upholders of
the affair), and it is proper and befitting to employ this title for all of
them, in accordance with the positions they had. But since the rising of Imam
Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) is a world uprising that subsumes all
social, individual, political, and economical conditions of humanity and brings
to fruition Allah’s promises to His prophets and the prophets’ prophecies to
their people, this title is used without qualification for that personage.
Thus, anytime they say “al-Qa’im” and their is not context that another one of
the Imams is intended, Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) is understood
from that.
In a tradition that Shaykh Saduq narrates in the book Kamal al-Din from
Imam Muhammad at-Taqi (peace be upon him), the ninth Imam, it has come:
إِنَّ
الإِمَامَ
بَعْدِي
ابْنِي
عَلِّي)...(
“The Imam after me is my son ‘Ali -
Imam ‘Ali al-Naqi (peace be upon him) - whose command is my
command, whose speech is my speech, and obedience to whom is obedience to me.
And the Imamah after him has been placed in his son Hasan - Imam Hasan
al-‘Askari (peace be upon him). His command is his
father’s command, his word is his father’s word, and obedience to him is
obedience to his father.
The narrator says, After that the Imam
fell silent.
I asked, O’ son of the Messenger of
Allah, then who is the Imam after Hasan (peace be upon him)?
The Imam at first wept to a great
extent and then said, After Hasan, his son is the Establisher of Truth, the
Awaited (القائم
بالحق
المنتظر).
I said, O’ son of the Messenger, why
has that personage been named “Qa’im” (The Riser)?
The Imam replied, because after his
name and remembrance is forgotten and most of the believers in his Imamah turn
back from their creed, he shall rise.
I said, Why has he been named
“Muntazar” (The Awaited)?
He replied, because he has an occultation
with a very long duration, such true believers will wait for his advent and appearance,
but people of doubt and uncertainty will deny and rejecters will ridicule him.
Those who specify a time for it will become many and those who are hasty during
that occultation will be destroyed, but the Muslims—those who submit—will
achieve salvation.”
‘Allamah Majlisi has said, the meaning
of “death” that has come in that weak tradition is that that personage will
arise after his name and memory has been forgotten.
And Shaykh Mufid relates a tradition from Imam as-Sadiq (peace
be upon him) in al-Irshad in which he says,"سمي
القائم
لقيامه
بالحق" “He was named the ‘Qa’im’ because he shall arise with truth.”[75]
And from some narrations another reason
that is understood is that the Imam was given this title by Allah because, in
the worlds before this world, he used to stand and pray.
Regarding the entitling of that
personage with the title “Al-Mahdi” as well, appropriate reasons have been
mentioned. Of course, it is not the case that “Al-Qa’im” is the original title
and “Al-Mahdi” is a secondary title. Both are titles and the usage of each name
has a separate reason. Rather, it can be said that since the concept of the
“Mahdi” is “the one whom Allah has guided” (من هداه
الله),
according
to rank, a person must be “Qa’im” whom Allah has guided.
That is, the “Qa’im” must be “one whom
Allah has guided,” but it is not necessary that “one whom Allah has guided”
must always be “Qa’im.” However, the actions, reforms, movement, uprising, and
stand that will take place by the Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return), such as
establishment of a world government, are dependent on rising and the becoming
actualized of the title “Qa’im.”
These titles are not classified into
primary and secondary, and all have been heard from the blessed tongues of the
Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) and pure Imams (peace be upon them);
nor do they have “old” and “new.” Each has its own particular concept and each
has been used with attention to a particular aspect. In texts, sometimes all of
these titles are mentioned, sometimes one, and another time one title is
mentioned before another.
In any case, application of these
titles is on the basis of essential and actualized titles, all of which that
personage possesses.
Two Types of
Occultation
QUESTION:
According to the content of existing
traditions, the occultation of the Imam of the Age (may Allah hasten his
return) has occurred in two forms. During the first occultation, communication
with him was possible through his representatives and agents, but with the
ending of this period and the beginning of the second occultation, which is the
complete occultation, the period of the responsibility of the agents and
particular representatives also ended.
The question is whether referring to
these two occultation as the “minor” (صغرى) and “major” (كبرى) was prevalent
from the beginning or whether it became prevalent in later times, like the
Safawi period.
ANSWER:
Discussion regarding issues like this
should not be a verbal discussion. Whether a person calls the first occultation,
which was shorter, the minor occultation (كبرى) or the shorter occultation (قصرى), or the second occultation, which has a long duration, the
major occultation (كبرى) or the longer
occultation (طولى) or refers to
them by any other word, the fact and reality of the matter is not changed. In
any case, these two occultations have occurred.
The issue is that principle of the
occultation having two forms was explicitly stated in the usul (early
hadith collections) and other books of hadith even before its occurrence.
Nu‘mani and others who lived before the termination
of the minor occultation have narrated it, and this fact is proof that the two
forms of occultation were put forth.
During the period of the minor
occultation, though the position of the Shi‘a was sensitive, no one can claim
that all these traditions related from the Imams (peace be upon them) in books
like the Ghaybat of al-Fadl ibn Sha’han and Nu‘mani and Kamal al-Din of Saduq are all falsified
and were written after the occurrence of the occultation.
We see that the Shi‘a of the various
cities and regions would refer to the nawwab (representatives); they did
not do such for no reason. Signs and evidences were definitely present that indicated
that they were in contact with the Imam. Otherwise, it is impossible that
individuals like ‘Ali ibn Babawayh, with that intellectual position and
eminence of thought, would pursue contact with the Imam (peace be upon him)
through the nawwab without their link being as clear for him as
daylight. This event itself indicates that they had clear evidence of the truth
of the representatives.
The other issue is that though Abu
Ja‘far al-‘Amrawi - ‘Uthman ibn Sa‘id—and the remaining
representatives were a means of Shi‘a unity and their agency was completely
accepted in all Shi‘a circles and regions, especially a city like Qum, this
unity was because of belief in the Imamah of the twelfth Imam. This
issue brought about the spiritual influence of the representatives, not that
they became a cause of Shi‘a unity without taking in view the issue of Imamah.
Th e unity and consensus of the Shi‘a
about believing in the Imamah of the twelfth Imam was the cause of their
unity in following the Imam’s (peace be upon them) representatives.
Just as today belief in the Imamah
of that personage is a cause of the spiritual influence in believers’ hearts of
the ‘Ulama’ and Fuqaha’ (scholars and jurists) as general representatives of
that personage.
During the minor occultation,
specification of the representatives took place directly by the person of the
Imam (peace be upon him), and the fact that we see eminent scholars lowering
their heads in submission before the representatives is proof that this
selection was by the person of the Imam (peace be upon him) on the basis of the
representatives’ worthiness. And the submission of all classes and political
and scholarly personalities is proof that original leadership during the period
of the minor occultation was with the person of the Imam (peace be upon him).
It was as a result of the existence of
persuasive evidence and proofs that scholarly men of the Shi‘a and
personalities like Abu Sahl al-Nawbakhti and Ibn Matil, and Hasan ibn
Janahasibi and other eminent Shi‘a believed in the righteousness of the
representatives.
Similarly, after the demise of the
fourth representative—‘Ali ibn Muhammad al-Samarri - also the issue that the
period of occultation and the particular representation has ended was accepted
by all. And if any claimed to be a representative, they repudiated him on the
basis of this very principle, and in passing it can be said that one of the
important wisdoms of the shorter occultation was to make the Shi‘a familiar
with the issue of occultation and preparing the ground for the period of the
long occultation, so the Shi‘a can continue his life during a long period
without the apparent presence of the Imam and successfully complete this major
Divine test.
The Miraculous
Birth of the Imam of the Age (may Allah hasten his return)
QUESTION:
Miracles and supernatural events are
related with regard to the birth of the twelfth Imam. To what extent are these
miracles reliable and how can they be proven? And why have some historians not
related them?
ANSWER:
1. Historians have written and recorded
the actual birth of Imam Mahdi the Twelfth Imam, son of Imam al-‘Askari (peace
be upon him), like all other historical events.
2. Regarding some of the miracles that
occurred during that personage’s birth or that of all other prophets and
trustees (awsiya’), if prevalent historical sources do not provide anything, this
is considered a defect of the sources mentioned, since the same historians in
many instances have pointed to some historical aspects which were not so
important. This lack of attention by a writer of history to some aspects of an
issue sometimes originates from creedal prejudice. But this action, whatever
it’s proof may be, does not harm the relations of other people’s statements
that took place based on reliable sources.
The history of the prophets is akandeh of miracles, and the birth and growth of most prophets
was not normal. For example, the creation of Adam, birth of Ibrahim (peace be upon him), birth of Ishaq and Musa and Yahya and ‘Isa and his speaking from the cradle are
all among abnormal events.
All of these are a chain of historical
events, though such-and-such historian may not have related them. The details
of the birth of the Imam of the Age (may Allah hasten his return), which is
among the uncontestable historical events, are similar. Its not being narrated
by historians who were either biased or intended to be brief or intended other
things does not harm the issue itself.
That which the Shi‘a attribute to the
Imams is similar to the issues that have been said about Ibrahim, Ishaq, Isma‘il, Musa, ‘Isa, Yahya, and so on,
all of which, of course, also have a reliable chain of narration.
The events related to the birth of the
Twelfth Imam are more reliable, from the point of view of chain of narration
and source, than most historical events that one sees.
Philosophy of
the Delay of Reappearance with the Presence of Conditions
QUESTION:
Throughout history, we sometimes come
across conditions and opportunities in which it is assumed the requisites for
reappearance are present, for example, the people’s receptiveness to religion,
self-sacrifice in the path of Islam, giving their lives, and martyrdom for it
was to such an extent or with such fervor and commotion that it appears that
rather than 313 people, thousands of people are ready to sacrifice their lives
under the command of the Imam (peace be upon him). With the existence of these
conditions, what is the secret of the delay of the reappearance?
ANSWER:
Regarding the presence of the
conditions for the reappearance of the Imam of the Age (may Allah hasten his
return):
First, no one can claim to know with
certainty, that is, say that all the conditions are fulfilled, since this claim
itself requires knowledge of all the conditions, since it is possible that the
traditions have not comprised an exposition of all of the conditions.
Second, assuming that the conditions
are limited to those instances that have come in the traditions, as Shaykh
al-Saduq has said, in reality one can still not be sure that those particular
313 companions and the remaining conditions are present.
This is because if all of the
conditions and circumstances apparently indicate the presence of the requisites
of reappearance, without denying, for example, the existence of pure
individuals who can be counted among the 313 companions of the Imam (peace be
upon him), we also cannot claim that all of the individuals are like Salman, Abu Dhar, Miqdad, Rashid Hijri, and the
people of Karbala’.
In the present situation, with all the
claims that are put forward in our society for returning to and aspiring at
Islam, which are certainly a matter of pride, we still see that many bring the
Divine laws under question in a large number of political, economical, and
social issues. This is to such an extent that they regard some religious
commandments that are not exclusive to a particular time or place as being
restricted to the Prophet’s (peace be upon him and his family) time and on this
pretext free themselves from responsibility. With the existence of such
individuals and events, how can we say that the conditions for reappearance are
ready, let alone asking about the reason for it delay?
On this basis, in this issue it is
appropriate for us to submit to the command and will of Allah, the All-Knowing,
and not forgo the merit of waiting for the reappearance. And as was indicated
in the tradition of ‘Ali ibn Mahziyar, we should attribute the concealment of
the Imam (peace be upon him) to our own actions and always keep the memory of
that personage alive in our hears and try to bring about the requisites of his
appearance ever more by reforming our own actions.
The Length of the Occultation and Difficult and
Formidable Trials
QUESTION:
According to what is well known, during
the occultation of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return), which will be very
lengthy, difficult trials will occur such that a person will be a believer in
the morning but a disbeliever in the evening. Are these types of trials in the
time near the reappearance or will such trials occur throughout the period of
occultation?
ANSWER:
According to Islamic principles, the
world is a place of tests and trials and people are in a state of being tried
during everything that happens to them. During youth and old age, whether
wealthy or in need, in health and illness, when in power, when in leadership,
they are always in a state of trial; it makes no difference whether the Imam
(peace be upon him) is present or in occultation.
The Qur’an says in this regard:
أَحَسِبَ
النَّاسَ
أَنْ
يُتْرَكُوا
أَنْ يَقُولُوا
آمَنَّا
وَهُمْ لاَ
يُفْتَنُونَ
“Have the people presumed they would be released upon saying, ‘We
believe,’ without being tested?”[76]
As we know, during the time of the
Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) himself, while all of the programs
and incidents were a test, sometimes, severe trials would occur, in which none
but a few were able to fulfill their obligation. For example, in battle, aside
from individuals like ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (peace be upon him) and Abu Dujana and
a few others, none were able to stand firm in jihad and defense of Islam
and the Prophet. This is because during severe trials, only a limited number of
people have the ability to stand firm; many an individual would flee out f
fear. It has been related that in on the battles ‘Uthman fled from the
battlefield and returned after three days. Or after the Prophet’s (peace be
upon him and his family) demise, such a severe trial came to pass that not more
than three or seven people were able to successfully perform their duty and
remain firm on the line that the Prophet (peace be upon him and his family) had
specified. Afterwards as well, such trials continued and shall continue, so
that, in the words of the Qur’an:
لِيَمِيزَ
الْخَبِيثَ
مِنَ
الطَّيِّبِ
“…so that Allah separates the
impure from the pure.”
These trials have wisdom and many
benefits, among which is that the disposition of the people of the world and
society become ready for that dignified reappearance in which the resolute and
steadfast believers will be separated from the remaining people. Preserving
one’s faith during the period of the Imam’s (peace be upon him) occultation is
possible by enduring very severe difficulties. Without doubt, millions of
people leave this school of trials with pride and heads held high, that is
through patience and forbearance and perseverance in difficulties, they succeed
in preserving their religion, faith, and honor.
According to the content of some
traditions, during this period protecting one’s religion will become more
difficult than holding fire in the palm of one’s hand, and oppression,
injustice, corruption, and perversion will become prevalent. Values will be
regarded as being against values, and things opposed to values will be regarded
as values. Sins will be considered a matter of pride and accomplishment. One’s
friends will encourage and induce him to sin and reproach him for not
cooperating with oppressors, sinners, and corrupt people.
Women will enter into work exclusive to
men. Many wars and natural afflictions will come about. In a tradition of Jabir
ibn Abdullah al-Ansari regarding the commentary of the verse:
أَطِيعُوا
اللهَ
وَأَطِيعُوا
الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي
الأَمْرِ
مِنْكُمْ
“(O you who believe!) Obey Allah and obey the
Messenger and those in authority amongst you (the legatees of the Messenger).”
It has come that the Noble Messenger
(peace be upon him and his family) gives news about his khulafa’ and
successors from Imam ‘Ali (peace be upon him) until Imam Mahdi (may Allah
hasten his return), names them one after one and gives tidings to the people
about the conquering of the East and West of the world at the blessed hands of
Imam al-Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return), and says, inter alia:
"ذَالَكَ
الَّذِي
يُغِيبُ عَنْ
شِيعَتِهِ وَأَوْلِيَائِهِ
غَيْبَةً لاَ
يُثْبِتُ فِيهَا
عَلَى
الْقَوْلِ
بِإِمَامَتِهِ
إِلاَّ مَنِ
امْتَحَنَ
اللهُ
قَلْبَهُ
لِلإِيمَانِ."
“He is the one who
will be concealed from his Shi‘a and friends such a concealment that none shall
remain firm in belief in his Imamah except one whose heart Allah has tested for
faith.”
And Amir al-Mu’minin has also informed about these difficulties
and tribulations in Nahj al-Balagha. In one
instance, he says;
مَا
أَطْوَلَ
هَذَا
العِنَاءِ
وَأَبْعَدَ هَذَا
الرَّجَاءِ.
“How lengthy is this adversity, and how
distant is this hope!”
It has even been related, in another
tradition, that:
إِنَّ
لِصَاحِبِ
هَذَا
الأَمْرِ
غَيْبَةً اَلْمُتَمَسِّكُ
فِيهَا
بِدِينِهِ
كَالْخَارَطِ
لِلْقِتَادِ.
“Verily the Master
of this Affair has a such a concealment that one who grips firmly to his
religion during it is like one who picks thorns with his hands.”[81]
Therefore, as can be
understood from the traditions, the entire period of concealment is a period of
trial and examination; of course, the types of those trials are different in
the different times and places. The
believer during this period must show perseverance in abiding by the
commandments of religion and struggling to elevate the word of Islam and honor
of the Muslims and to repel the influence and cultural and political domination
of foreigners. He must be in combat and jihad with all negative and
unhelpful circumstances and conditions and be hopeful of the victory of Islam
and the Muslims and the succor of Allah. He must not lose hold of himself in
face of the power and strength of the disbelievers or become inclined towards
their improper behavior. And at the same time he must have certainty that the
promises of Allah and the Prophet of Allah are true and that eventually Islam
will be victorious and conquer the world, as a result of which justice and
equity shall fill the world.
The Principle of Grace and the Imamah of the Concealed
Imam
Has the
“principle of grace” been derived from the traditions and narrations of the Ahl
al-Bait (peace be upon them) or has it entered Shi‘a kalam (theology)
through the contact of the Shi‘a with the Mu‘tazila? And what is the method of applying this
principle with the existence of the concealed Imam?
Answer:
Since the
Shi‘a have many proofs regarding the principle of Imamah aside from the
principle of grace, with the existence of those proofs, if the principle of
grace is relied upon, it is for the purpose of supporting the proofs.
As for the contact of the Shi‘a with the Mu‘tazila, who are sometimes
referred to as the adliyya (Equitists) as opposed to the Asha‘ira, it should be
known that though the Mu‘tazila, a sect that splintered off from the Asha‘ira
and came into being after the Shi‘a, were in agreement with the Shi‘a over some
beliefs and theological issues, this is not proof of their affecting the Shi‘a
school. Rather, it is instead
proof of their being affected by Shi‘a beliefs, since the Asha‘ira are a sect
that came into being later on. Moreover, as was mentioned, all of the Shi‘a
beliefs are taken from reason, the Glorious Qur’an, and traditions of the Ahl
al-Bait (peace be upon them). The principle of grace is also from the Shi‘a
themselves and is derived from those very sources and origin.
It is in a
tradition that Jabir asked the Prophet of Allah (peace be upon him and his
family) about the benefit of the existence of a concealed Imam and the way of
deriving benefit from his existence during the concealment. The Prophet (peace
be upon him and his family) said in reply,
أَيْ
وَالَّذِي
بَعَثَنِي
بِالنُّبُّوَةِ!
إِنَّهُمْ
يَنْتَفِعُونَ
بِهِ
وَيَسْتَضْيِئُونَ
بِنُورِ
وِلاَيَتِهِ
فِي
غَيْبَتِهِ
كَانِتْفَاعِ
النَّاسِ بِالشَّمْسِ
وَإِنْ
جَلَّلَهَا
السَّحَّابِ.
To negate in entirety that the
existence of a concealed Imam is lutf (grace) is not proper for a
rational person who is unaware of unseen affairs. After the Imamah
itself and his concealment are established, certainty of the existence of grace
and presence of a benefit in his existence is necessary, since if the
appointment of an Imam who has been commanded to go into concealment does not
entail grace, it is futile and vain; and Allah is far above vain and futile
actions. Therefore, the appointment of a concealed Imam by Allah certainly
entails lutf (grace).
Granted, if we wish to establish both
the necessity of appointment of an Imam and the Imamah of a concealed
person through the principle of grace, the objection arises that it must first
be known that the concealed Imam entails grace. Otherwise, without knowledge of
its being grace, his Imamah will not be established. However, we
establish the necessity of appointment of an Imam through the principle of
grace and the Imamah of the concealed Imam through other firm proofs,
and by joining these two proofs to the fact that Allah does not do anything in
vain, it is established that the Imamah of the concealed Imam entails
grace. The statement of al-Muhaqqiq al-Tusi, who says;
وُجُودِهِ
لُطْفٌ
وَتَصْرِفُهُ
لُطْفٌ آخِرَ
وَعَدَمُهُ
مِنَّا.
is based on the principle that the
existence of the Imam is grace absolutely, whether manifest or hidden. And this
is a principle that has been established in accordance with the speech of Amir
al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him), who says:
لَئَلَّا
تُبْطِلُ
حُجَجِ اللهِ
وَبَيِّنَاتِهِ.
The Divine proofs and signs are
protected by the existence of the Imam, whether he be present or concealed.
It is worthy of mention that if the
objection of the absence of grace with regard to the concealed Imam be valid,
it is also applicable to an Imam who is not concealed, yet who is not able to
act freely in affairs. His Imamah will be without grace for the same
reason that the Imamah of the concealed Imam is regarded as being
without grace. However, this objection has not been made with regard to the
manifest Imam who is not able to freely act in the affairs and tasks pertaining
to Imamah. Similarly, it has not been made regarding a prophet who, due
to circumstances, is unable to guide others or whose guidance is not effective,
or a prophet whose mission was general, but opponents and adversaries prevented
his message from reaching the entire public, and it has not been denied that
his prophecy entails grace.
It is possible to establish a rational
proof of the Imamah of the concealed Imam (peace be upon him) with the
exposition that appointment and specification of the Imam by Allah is grace,
and grace is obligatory upon Allah. Therefore, Allah has appointed someone to Imamah
after Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (peace be upon him), and that person will not
be other than his son, since the incapacity and invalidity of the other
claimants to Imamah has been established and at present, no one has such
a claim. Thus, either Allah has withheld grace to His servants during the
period of concealment, which is opposed to Divine wisdom, or He has appointed
an Imam out of grace, in which case the Imam is none other than the twelfth
Imam.
The Issue of Bada’ (Alteration in the Divine
Will) and the Tradition of Abu Hamza
QUESTION:
A tradition has been narrated by Abu
Hamza Thumali from Imam Al-Baqir (peace be upon him) according to which Amir
al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him) said that relief will
come after the 70th year after Hijra, but because of the martyrdom
of Imam Husayn (peace be upon him) the affair was delayed until the year 140
after Hijra. Then, because the Shi‘a did not protect the secret, Allah once
again delayed the affair such that He did not place any time for it in the
knowledge of the Imams.
Please explain the commentary of this
tradition along with the many other traditions that indicate that the promised
relief shall occur after long periods and following great events and
happenings. And doesn’t the occurrence of bada’, which is
understood from this tradition, cause the presumption that something became
known for Allah—we seek refuge with Allah—after it had been unknown? In any
case, what is the correct explanation?
ANSWER:
First: This tradition has objections in
its chain of narrators, since according to books of rijal, Abu Hamza al-Thumali did not belong to the fourth
generation of narrators; his demise occurred in the year 150 A.H. Hasan ibn
Mahbub, who according to the chain of narrators narrated this tradition from
Abu Hamza, is from the sixth generation, and passed away at the age of 75 years
in the year 224 A.H. Thus, Hasan ibn Mahbub was not more than one year old when
Abu Hamza passed away. In such a case it is absolutely not possible for him to
narrate from Abu Hamza, and without doubt another individual was an
intermediary between him and Abu Hamza. However, since it is not known who that
person is, we cannot regard this tradition as reliable; moreover, a tradition
narrated by only one person cannot be an authority in doctrinal principles, let
alone when its chain of narrators is also unknown.
Second: With the existence of many
reliable traditions that all explicitly indicate that the reappearance of Imam
Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) and the just government of the righteous
shall not come to pass that quickly and that one must await magnificent changes
and grave events over very long periods before his reappearance, how can a
forged tradition with only one chain of narrators be relied upon in the face of
all those traditions? Moreover, many sermons and traditions have been related
from Amir al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him) in which both the length
of the period during which one must await the reappearance and the great events
and severe trials of the believers have been referred to. With the existence of
this, how is it possible to say that a singly-narrated, forged traditions that
says that the Imam specified the time of reappearance as the year 70 A.H. is reliable.
In addition, alteration in Divine
decrees is a conceivable matter, though this does not mean that Allah the
Exalted is unaware of affairs in the beginning and then acquires knowledge of
them. Such a belief is invalid according to the Shi‘a, since all Shi‘a believe
Allah to be free and far removed from ignorance coming to know about something
after its being concealed. Bada’, in the conception which the Shi‘a
believe in, is a Qur’anic and Islamic principle, and an important part of the
issues of theology and similarly the issues of prophecy are based on it.
Among the verses related to bada’ are;
وَلَوْ
أَنَّ اَهْلَ
القُرى
آمَنُوا
وَاتَّقَوا
لَفَتَحْنَا
عَلَيْهِمْ
بَرَكَاتِ مِّنَ
السَّمَاءِ
وَالأَرْضِ
وَلَكِنَ كَذَّبُوا
فَأَخَذْنَاهُمْ
بِمَا
كَانُوا
يَكْسِبُونَ
“Were the inhabitants of the
cities to believe and adopt piety, We would open them blessings from the sky
and the earth; yet they denied (the truth), so We requited them what they had
earned.”[83]
ظَهَرَ
الْفَسَادُ
فِي الْبَرِّ
وَالْبَحْرِ
بِمَا
كَسَبَتْ
أَيِدِي
النَّاسِ
“Corruption has manifested in the land and in the sea on account
of what the hands of the people have earned.”[84]
وَقَالَ
رَبُّكُمْ
اُدْعُونِي
أَسْتَجِبْ
لَكُمْ
“Your Lord has said, Call on Me that I may answer you.”[85]
اَسْتَغْفِرُوا
رَبَّكُمْ
إِنَّهُ
كَانَ غَفَّاراً
يُرْسِلُ
السَّمَاءَ
عَلَيْكُمْ
مِدْرَاراً
“Seek forgiveness from your Lord, since He is Ever-Forgiving; He
constantly sends rain upon you from the sky.”[86]
وَوَاعَدْنَا
مُوْسَى
ثَلَثِينَ
لَيْلَةً وَأَتْمَمْنَاهَا
بِعَشْرٍ
“We covenanted Musa thirty nights, then completed them with ten
(nights more).”[87]
فَلَوْلاَ
كَانَتْ
قَرْيَةٍ
آمَنَتْ فَنَفْعِهَا
إِيْمَانُهَا
إِلاَّ
قَوْمُ يُوْنُسٍ
لَمَّا
آمَنُوا
كَشَفْنَا
عَنْهُمْ عَذَابَ
الْخِزْيِ
فِي
الْحَيَاةِ
الدُّنْيَا
وَمَتَعْنَاهُمْ
إِلى حِيَن
“So why did not one of the
cities believe that its belief might benefit it except the people of Yunus;
when they believed we remove from them the debasing punishment in this world
and cause them to enjoy until a specified time.”[88]
لَئِنْ
شَكَرْتُمْ
لأَزِيدِنَّكُمْ
“Verily, if you be grateful, I shall increase you (in blessings).”[89]
وَمَنْ
يَتَّقِ
اللهَ
يَجْعَلْ
لَهُ مَخْرَجاً
وَيَرْزُقْهُ
مِنْ حَيْثُ
لاَ يَحْتَسِبُ
“Whoever adopts piety with
regard to Allah, He creates for him an escape (from difficulty) and grants him
sustenance whence he does not expect.”[90]
ذَالِكَ
بِأَنَّ
اللهَ لَمْ
يَكُ
مُغَيِّراً
نِعْمَةٍ
أَنْعَمَهَا
عَلَى قَوْمٍ
حَتَّى
يُغَيِّرُوا
مَا
بِأَنْفُسِهِم
“That is because Allah does not change any blessing He had granted
unto a people until they change what is in themselves.”[91]
The bada’ that the Shi‘a believe in, along with belief
in the absolute knowledge and power of Allah, is a concept that is understood
from such verses. For example, in them it is said that gratitude causes
blessings from Allah to increase; Allah delivers a pious person from hardships
by virtue of piety (taqwa) and sustains him from an unexpected source;
He fulfills needs through prayer; on account of repentance and faith, He
distances people from punishment; and because of misuse of blessings, He
removes them from people.
Of course, abundant traditions that
have been narrated by Shi‘a and Sunnis and similarly manifold stories
which have been related in original Islamic sources indicate this point. In
fact, if bada’ were not to exist, many religious concepts,
such as prayer, reliance on Allah, repentance, charity, kindness towards
relatives, gratitude, seeking forgiveness, admonition, granting tidings, and
threatening, will be impossible to explain. Bada’ means belief in the
effect of these affairs in the life of a person.
Whether we are able to explain bada’ in view of Allah’s absolute knowledge and
cognizance of all affairs or are unable to understand its secret and reality,
in any case we must believe in the issue of bada’ in accordance with the
content of manifold verses of Qur’an and mutawatir traditions.
This is because sometimes, though all
the factors and preliminaries for the occurrence of something are present,
other factors strip them of their effect and as a result prevent that thing
from occurring. In such a case, the existence of those factors, their
continuation, and the factors that strip them of their effect are all preserved
in the Umm al-Kitab by Divine decree in accordance with the order and
arrangement He has specified. Those affairs are also linked to people’s actions
by choice, they occur through the will of Allah and His decree. That is,
neither compulsion (jabr) is involved, nor delegation (tafwid);
rather it is a reality between the two:
لاَ
جَبْرَ وَلاَ
تَفْوِيضَ
بَلْ أَمْرَ
بَيْنَ
الأَمْرَينِ.
“Neither compulsion (jabr) nor delegation (tafwid), but a matter
between the two ideas.”
As an example, Allah has decreed that
fire should burn or that every created being should develop in its particular
course, and if an obstacle comes about, that thing will not exist. Of course,
it should be kept in mind that in matters pertaining to matter, if an obstacle
to their coming about blocks the causes of an event, this is not called bada’. Only in
instances when things like charity, kindness to family, and prayer influence
the occurrence or nonoccurrence of an affair such that humanity considers its
existence or non-existence definite from the point of view of apparent causes
and then the opposite occurs, that is called bada’.
This is though apparently this instance
does not have much difference from the previous instance except that the object
of effacement and affirmation in the first issue was observable matters and
able to be perceived by most or all people, but in the second issue it is
non-observable matters; thus, most individuals are unable to perceive it. The
second type indicates the existence and influence of the unseen world and the
existence of Allah more than the first, though all affairs are from Him.
In summary, the concept of bada’ is the same concept that is well understood
from this verse of Qur’an in which Allah the Exalted refutes the false belief
of the Jews:
وَقَالَتِ
الْيَهُودُ
يَدُ اللهِ
مَغْلُوْلَةً
غُلَّتْ
أَيْدِيهِمِ
وَلُعِنُوا
بِمَا
قَالُوا بَلْ
يَدَاهُ
مَبْسُوطَتَانِ
يُنْفِقُ
كَيْفَ
يَشَاءُ
“And the Jews said, Allah’s hand is fettered, may their hands be
fettered and they be cursed on account of what they said. Rather His hands are
outspread; He bestows howsoever He wishes.”[93]
Thus bada’ in its correct meaning is the negation of
this erroneous belief of the Jews, who say that Allah’s hand is fettered from
acting in affairs. In other words, bada’ means that Allah’s hands are
extended and His absolute power is unlimited, without this having any conflict
with His absolute knowledge.
In other words, the reality of bada’, with its
correct meaning such that it is compatible with Allah’s absolute knowledge, in
accordance with His freedom from all forms of ignorance, and opposed to the
erroneous view of the Jews and all other deniers of the issue of bada’
who view Allah’s power as limited, must be explained thus: According to Divine
decree, everything has particular effects, and things take place in accordance
with those effects in conformance to Divine Will.
In other words, it is a Divine decree
that, for example, fire should burn, but the realization of this
characteristic—its occurrence—is pursuant to Divine Will. In addition, there
are a number of unseen causes, such as reliance on Allah, charity, and
prayer—which are not common material affairs—all of which have a peculiar
effect. In the stage of action, whichever of those material or non-material
causes—apparent or unseen—is stronger will be effective in the occurrence of
affairs, and its entailed result will come about. For example, in many cases,
in spite of the existence of barriers, kindness to relatives, which has been
decreed as a factor in lengthening one’s life overcomes all other factors and
as a result a person’s life is lengthened. Thus, it has come in a tradition:
صِلَّةُ
الرَّحْمِ
تُزِيدُ فِي
الْعُمْرِ وَتُدْفَعُ
مِيْتَةَ
السُّوْءِ.
“Kindness to relatives lengthens the life and repels the
difficulties of death”
The summary of the reality of bada’ is that causes and factors are not limited to
material causes. Rather, in addition to material causes, there are also
non-material causes in accordance with Divine decree.
On this basis, one must have faith both
in unseen causes and in Divine Will and that:
كُلُّ
يَوْمٍ هُوَ
فِي شَأْنِ
“Every day He
is in a state [of glory]”[95]
and the continuance of His acting in
sustaining, curing, guiding, and so forth. Without Allah’s will, nothing can
produce an effect, though we are unable to fathom the details of these Divine
matters and their connection to one another.
It is possible that the meaning of
“effacement” in bada’ is the effacement of these decrees by other
decrees, such as the effacement of the effect of illness and being cured by
medicine or prayer, which takes place by the will of Allah. The decree and
effect of the illness is also by Divine will, just as we see that in material
and apparent causes and effects a particular factor prevented a person from
falling into the ocean or from a high place or prevented the occurrence of an
accident or collision. And sometimes this change is effaced or affirmed by the
influence of unseen causes.
Perhaps the meaning is that decrees are
not definite; it is only through the will of Allah that these decrees are
effaced or affirmed, and without that no decree comes to fruition. And the
meaning of:
وَعِنْدَهُ
أُمُّ
الْكِتَابِ
“And with Him
is the ‘Mother of the Book’
is that all relations and decrees are
in the “Mother of the Book,” or that whatever takes place does not take place
in contradiction to it, and everything is in the “Mother of the Book.”
In any case, bada’ has an intelligible and logical meaning and
it can’t be said to mean the uncovering of a matter hidden from or unknown by
Allah. The purpose of explaining bada’ in terms of each of the mentioned
explanations is so that by understanding these realities people’s attention to
Allah increase and so that they do not forget Him in any circumstances or rely
only on apparent and ordinary means in their affairs. And even when those means
are present they should still consider themselves in need of Allah’s attention,
and when those means are not present, they should not become hopeless; Allah
may very well bring about that matter through other means.
In short, unlike the Jews, he should
not consider Allah’s hands to be tied, and should believe in the great truth of
Divine unity that:
قُلِ
الَّلهُمَّ
مَالِكُ
الْمُلْكِ
تُؤْتِي
الْمُلْكَ
مَنْ تَشَاءُ
وَتُنْزِعُ
الْمُلْكَ
مِمَّنْ
تَشَاءُ
وَتُعِزُّ
مَنْ تَشَاءُ
وَتُذِلُّ
مَنْ تَشَاءُ
بِيَدِكَ الْخَيْرَ
إِنَّكَ
عَلَى كُلِّ
شَيءٍ قَدِيرِ.
“Say: O’ Allah, Master of the Kingdom, You grant the kingdom to
whomsoever You please and remove it from whomsoever You please; You make mighty
whomsoever You please and debase whomsoever You please. All good lies in Your hand; verily You have
power over all things.”
As a matter of principle, without such
a conviction, the development of humanity and their traveling the worlds of
cognizance and true advancement and ascension to celestial positions is not
possible. This is a reality that also has a basis in human nature, and even if
he denies the issue of bada’ with his tongue, he admits it with his
conscience. Thus, in situations of danger, he supplicates to Allah to repel
them and takes recourse to His most beautiful names, like the Sustainer, the
Healer, the Sufficient, the Protector, all of which make sense through belief
in bada’.
And as Allah says in the Qur’an:
قُلْ
أَرَأَيْتَكُمْ
إِنْ
أَتَاكُمْ
عَذَابَ للهِ
أَوْ
أَتَتْكُمِ
السَّاعَةَ
أَغَيْرَ
اللهِ
تَدْعُونَ
إِنْ
كُنْتُمْ
صَادِقِينَ
بَلْ
إِيَّاهُ
تَدْعُونَ.
“Say: Do you think that if Allah’s punishment
come to you or the Hour (of Resurrection) come, that you will call upon other
than Allah, if you be truthful; rather Him alone will you call.”[98]
Based on this importance which belief
in bada’ has in worshipping Allah and paying attention
to Him, it has come in Shi‘a traditions that:
مَا عُبِدَ
اللهَ
بِشَيْءٍ
مِثْلُ
الْبَدَاءِ
“Allah has not been worshipped by
anything like belief in bada’”[99]
In summary, the issue of bada’, no matter how
it is explained, does not contradict Allah’s absolute knowledge. That is, just
as He is “All-Knowing,” He is also “All-Powerful.”
Two objections have been raised
regarding the issue of bada’.
First Objection:
The first objection is from the
believers in predetermination, who say that when Allah has knowledge with
respect to something, it is impossible for His knowledge to be in disagreement
with the thing that is known. Thus, the meaning of “Every day He is in a state
of glory” is that every day and every instant whatever Allah’s knowledge is
associated to occurs; He creates and sustains and withholds. All actions are
from Him, and nothing occurs that is outside the range of His knowledge. In
fact, outside the limits of His knowledge, no action is possible. Similarly, it
is obligatory for all events to which His knowledge is associated to take
place, since for such actions not to take place entails His being ignorant,
while The Divine Essence is pure of all forms of ignorance, defect, and fault.
From this they raise the objection of Allah—as well as His creation—being compelled.
Of course, this objection is rejected
by referring to one’s reason, since every individual clearly and unambiguously
sees himself as free in his actions. In reality, this is a form of objection
with respect to obvious matters, just like if someone doubts whether fire burns
or makes hot.
Another answer to this objection is
that first of all, it doesn’t disprove the issue of bada even if it is
valid, since if one believes in predetermination and denies free will,
effacement and affirmation, which are among Allah’s actions, will in the end
occur either by compellation or free will, like all other actions.
In other words, a person who believes
in predetermination cannot negate effacement and affirmation with this
objection; he can only say that the occurrence of effacement and affirmation,
which are both Divine actions, is necessary and certain.
Second, the correct answer to the
objection itself is that effacement and affirmation are both uncompelled Divine
actions, and like all other Divine actions take place through free will; and
“Allah’s knowledge of their occurrence through free will” cannot negate their
being uncompelled. Otherwise, it would entail knowledge influencing the thing
that is known, which is impossible. Similarly, with regard to the actions of
people, Allah has knowledge that they will occur through free will. Such
knowledge does not negate the person’s free will. It appears that the sage
Muhaqqiq al-Tusi refers to this asnswer when he says (in the form of a poetical
couplet) in answer to Khayyam:
To term the timeless Divine knowledge
the cause of disobedience
Is, among those possessed of reason,
out of extreme ignorance
That is, knowledge of the performance
of actions by individuals possessing free will does not contradict the
uncompelled nature of those actions.
Second Objection:
How can the prophecies of the Prophets
and Divine friends regarding unseen future events, especially the prophecies of
the Noble Messenger (peace be upon him and his family) and the pure Imams
(peace be upon them) be explained and justified if bada’ is possible with regard to them? That is, how
have they given information with certainty about so many future events without
taking into account the possibility of bada’ with respect to those
prophecies?
ANSWER:
The possibility of occurrence of bada’ and its occurrence in some instances does not
mean that it occurs in all instances. Thus, the prophecies of those personages,
whose knowledge was grounded in Allah’s knowledge and teaching and inspiration,
indicates that bada’ will not occur, and is not in contradiction with
the possibility of bada’.
The objection may also be worded in a
different way: according to some traditions, in some instances the reports of
the prophets and Imams (peace be upon them) did not come to pass, and the
reason for that has been mentioned as bada’ or other factors. And this entails having
informed about something that is untrue and being accused of lying, and causes
a weakening of the position of prophecy and vicgerency.
In addition, the prophet or vicegerent
who makes the prophecy either knows about the occurrence of bada’ or doesn’t know about it. In the first case,
it is obvious that announcing with certainty the occurrence of an event that
will not occur even though the announcer knows that it will not occur
constitutes a lie. And the position of the prophets is far removed from that.
In the second case as well, announcing
with certainty the occurrence of an event that may or may not occur because of
the possibility of bada’, if not a lie,
does not much befit the position of prophecy or Imamah.
ANSWER:
First, according to reliable traditions, the knowledge and awareness of unseen
matters that Allah grants to the prophet or his successor and commands him to
announce belongs to the definite affairs in which there is no bada’. For example,
the Prophet’s (peace be upon him and his family) prophecy about ‘Ammar being
killed at the hands of the rebellious party, about the martyrdom of Amir
al-Mu’minin and Imam Husayn (peace be upon him) and the
remaining tragedies to befall the Ahl al-Bait (peace be upon them), or about
Fatimah (peace be upon her) being the first of the
Ahl al-Bait to meet him, all are definite matters not subject to bada’.
The same is true about the prophecy that Islam shall subdue the world, that
Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return) will appear at the end of time and the
explanation of his qualities and characteristics, and tens of other undeniable
prophecies. Similarly, the reports about the unseen given by Amir al-Mu’minin
(peace be upon him), much of which the Ahl al-Sunnat have also narrated, and the reports of the
remaining Imams (peace be upon them) about unseen affairs are not subject to bada’,
or more correctly, bada’ will not take place in these matters, or else
those personages would not have given information about them.
The traditions which mention the
existence of bada’ in their reports of the unseen are either
very rare or contain a weak chain of narration, or else their indication of
such a point is incomplete. Take for example the same tradition of Abu Hamzah which was
discussed earlier.
If there is a sahih (sound)
tradition in this regard, it is the tradition of Amr ibn Hamq from Amir
al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him) which says, I had the
honor of coming to the presence of Amir al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him) when he
had been struck with the fatal blow; he (peace be upon him) said, O’ Amr, I
shall part from you… until the year 70, calamities will take place; he repeated
this statement thrice.
I said, O’ Amir al-Mu’minin (peace be upon him), you said that calamities
will occur until the year 70; is there deliverance after that year?
He said, Yes, Amr. After every trial
there is deliverance and ease.
يَمْحُو
اللهَ مَا
يَشَاءُ
وَيُثْبِتُ
وَعِنْدَهُ
أُمُّ
الْكِتَابِ
“Allah effaces whatsoever He
pleases and affirms, and with Him is the Mother of the Book.”
This tradition does not prophesy the
appearance and uprising of the Imam of the Time (may Allah hasten his return);
rather it gives information about a Divine custom,
إِنَّ
مَعَ
الْعُسْرِ
يُسْراً
“Verily with difficulty is ease.”[101]
At the same time, it mentions the point
that this deliverance will come to be in the case that bada’ does not occur. In reality, the Imam, by
reciting the verse “Allah effaces whatsoever He pleases and affirms, and with
Him is the Mother of the Book” wanted to say that this matter is not definite;
it may very well be that bada’ will occur and prevent it from occurring.
Belief in the Return (Raj’ah) with respect to Belief
in the Mahdi (may Allah hasten his return)
QUESTION:
According to many traditions, at the
end of time a number of the deceased Imams (peace be upon them) as well as
others will return to this world. Is belief in the concealment of the twelfth
Imam (may Allah hasten his return) and his reappearance in accordance with
belief in the return (raj’ah)? In other words, does the belief in concealment
and reappearance include the return and all other events that will occur before
the Day of Judgment, or is it an independent belief separate from the return?
ANSWER:
Belief in the appearance of the Mahdi
and Savior from the Ahl al-Bait and progeny of Fatimah (peace be upon her) is a widespread and
collective belief of the Muslims and is not exclusive to the Shi‘a. Though the
Shi‘a also specify his identity in terms of lineage and characteristics, the
belief itself is universal, and its tidings have been given in previous
religions in the Tawrat and Zabur as well. And according to the principles of
the Twelver Shi‘a school, without belief in it, one’s faith is incomplete, and
the acceptance of one’s actions is dependent on accepting it. One who dies
without believing in this issue or who does not recognize the twelfth Imam (may
our souls be his ransom) as the Imam has died the death of ignorance according
to the judgment of the prophetic tradition:
مَنْ
مَاتَ وَلَمْ
يَعْرِفْ
إِمَامِ
زَمَانِهِ
مَاتَ
مِيْتَةً
جَاهِلِيَّةٍ.
“Whoever
dies without recognizing the Imam of his time dies the death of the Age of
Ignorance.”
This belief, in terms of influence and
importance, is at this level.
Belief in the return as well, though it
is rooted in the Qur’an and traditions, is not such that the issue of
concealment and reappearance not be explainable without it.
Thus, the principle of Imamah
and the issue of the Mahdi has been discussed in books even without mention of
the issue of the return.
Still, it must be mentioned that the
issue of raj’ah and the return of the deceased itself is an Islamic issue and
its occurrence in previous times is confirmed on the basis of numerous verses
of the Qur’an. When this is the case, since it has had a parallel in the past,
the possibility of its reoccurrence at the end of time cannot be denied.
When the return of the deceased has
occurred in past ummah (communities), according to well-known tradition famous
among the Ahl al-Sunnat, they must
consider it possible in this ummah as well:
لِتَسْلُكْنَ
سُبُلَ مَنْ
كَانَ
قَبْلِكُمْ
حَذُوا
النَعْلَ
بِالنَعْلَ
وَالقَذْةَ
بِالْقَذْةِ
حَتَّى لَوْ
أَنْ
أَحَدُهُمْ
دَخَلَ
حَجْرَ ضَبَّ
لَدَخَلْتُمُوهُ.
“Verily you will follow
the path of those before you…”[103]
Thus, the denial of its possibility in this ummah by non-Shias is
incorrect according to the meaning of this tradition.
In the end, while overlooking the
verses that mention the occurrence of raj’ah in previous ummahs, for the sake
of blessings and grace we mention one verse that bears witness to its
occurrence in this Nation:
“And (remember) the day when We shall gather
from every community a group of those who gave the lie to Our signs, so they
will meet one another.”
This verse indicates a day when from
every ummat a group of people will be gathered who gave the lie to the Divine
signs, which naturally is a day other than the Day of Judgment.
ولا حول ولا
قوة إلا بالله
العلي
العظــــيم
وآخر
دعوانا أن
الحمد لله رب
العالمين
And there is no might nor power save with Allah
And
our final assertion is that all
praise
is for Allah the Lord of the Worlds.